|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jun 21, 2019 5:42:58 GMT
CLEVELAND TRADES
77 Joe Ingles $13,500,000 $14,512,500 $15,525,000 $16,537,500
73 Jordan Bell $1,562,200 $1,825,600 $3,192,974 $4,668,129
77 Wayne Ellington $1,200,000 $2,000,000
Total: 16,262,200
SACRAMENTO TRADES
80 Darren Collison $16,174,651 $16,174,651 $16,174,651
#19 2019 Pick
Total: 16,174,651
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jun 21, 2019 5:49:46 GMT
I accept. I put a lot of time into scouting this draft, and I am kinda disappointed because I chose the wrong draft to invest time with. Nonetheless, I want one more shot, although I need to give up my starting 4, Bell and a great shooter.
Bell was the hardest to give up because I really believed GSW suppressed his value. How come a playoff rotational player in 2018 played that little in 2019?
Nonetheless, I am hoping the guy that I wanted for #19 will be available.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ghazny Dimalen on Jun 21, 2019 6:02:10 GMT
I accept i need a depth to roatate in my lineup. I can wait for john wall to fully recover in his injury.
I will start vanvleet and ingles if this trade will pass
|
|
Tim Duncan
Former Jazz GM
Sophomore
Posts: 482
Mar 9, 2022 22:04:51 GMT
|
Post by Tim Duncan on Jun 21, 2019 6:26:59 GMT
When i saw Cleveland in the title of the trade thread i thought they are trading the 1st pick away lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jun 21, 2019 6:32:04 GMT
This seems pretty horrible for Sacramento. Even if the 19th pick wasn’t in it, Cleveland is still winning.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jun 21, 2019 6:48:40 GMT
I am pretty sure Collison was one of those rating downs that were taken down before the playoffs. He failed to sustain what he did in 2018 and I am pretty sure he is not an 80 anymore.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jun 21, 2019 11:47:50 GMT
Why is sac giving up a pick in this trade?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jun 22, 2019 0:26:27 GMT
bump.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 22, 2019 2:32:35 GMT
Tough one. I guess you could say Collison for Ingles is relatively fair, and the 19th for Bell + Ellington is relatively fair. In both cases though Cleveland wins imo, so overall Cleveland wins by a lot. It's not that damaging for SAC, even if it's a bad deal, so I'll accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jun 22, 2019 2:42:14 GMT
I hate Golden State (IRL)! They succeeded in suppressing Bell's value to the point that he is not worthy as the 19th pick of this bad draft.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jun 22, 2019 3:34:59 GMT
Yea this is one where I prefer one side by so much, but it also looks to be within the realm of an accept, so there I go.
Accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 22, 2019 9:38:51 GMT
I'll also accept but, after the Lillard trade and this one, Sacramento picks are starting to look pretty enticing, one of which Cleveland owns so it's a double bonus there.
Trade passed.
|
|
Tim Duncan
Former Jazz GM
Sophomore
Posts: 482
Mar 9, 2022 22:04:51 GMT
|
Post by Tim Duncan on Jun 29, 2019 4:15:01 GMT
So Collision retired
|
|
Tim Duncan
Former Jazz GM
Sophomore
Posts: 482
Mar 9, 2022 22:04:51 GMT
|
Post by Tim Duncan on Jun 29, 2019 4:15:19 GMT
Does that make this trade invalid
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jun 29, 2019 6:40:16 GMT
Does that make this trade invalid I was first going to voice my opinion that it shouldn’t be because you posted it before his announcement, but the fact that this basically makes it a 16 per for 2 yr salary dump makes me lean in favor of finding it too lopsided |
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Jan 9, 2020 3:47:46 GMT
Did this trade process? It seems that Sacramento originally had the 19 pick?
|
|
Cleveland Cavaliers
Brooklyn Nets
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
Charlotte Hornets
Houston Rockets
