|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Aug 13, 2013 22:52:35 GMT
Current Rating: 72 Proposed Rating: 78
2013 stats: 14.1 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 3.8 apg, .5 spg, .1 bpg
I'm not asking for a lot here. Redick is clearly not a 72, and I could definitely see him being an 80- but I've settled to just shoot for a 78 for now. He has steadily improved every year (especially on defense) and is one of the hardest working, biggest hustle guys in the league, and his play has reflected that. If anyone has seriously watched Redick, you know he's the kind of guy you want on your team, which is why he will likely be the starting SG for the Clippers this season.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 1:15:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2013 23:00:15 GMT
I feel like I should just agree with whatever Barber says, since I offered for four of his guys just now, but in all honesty I don't see a 78. I think I would go 75 at the highest, and I compare JJ to a guy like Danny Green. However, his overall game lags behind Danny's immensely. I do agree about his upside with the Clippers and think you got a good deal for him, but am not ready to declare him that highly rated just yet.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Aug 13, 2013 23:04:01 GMT
his overall game lags behind Danny's immensely. ...aka is better in nearly every statistical category but didn't get the same media coverage
|
|
Glenn Robinson
Milwaukee Bucks
Starter
Posts: 1,226
Mar 2, 2024 5:20:47 GMT
|
Post by Glenn Robinson on Aug 13, 2013 23:09:50 GMT
I think a 77 would be fine. Redick definitely had a poor second half last year for Milwaukee and couldn't shoot the ball at all. I think being in L.A. with Chris Paul will help his game more and create better looks for him.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Aug 13, 2013 23:10:05 GMT
his overall game lags behind Danny's immensely. ...aka is better in nearly every statistical category but didn't get the same media coverage This is pretty much the truth lol. He's no 80 but I'll give him a 77-78.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 1:15:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2013 23:20:47 GMT
his overall game lags behind Danny's immensely. ...aka is better in nearly every statistical category but didn't get the same media coverage When Redick can think about doing a decent job guarding Lebron then let me know.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 1:15:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2013 23:25:33 GMT
Oh and let us look at those stats! Redick in 2013: 14.1 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 3.8 apg, .5 spg, .1 bpg Green in 2013: 10.5 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 1.8 apg, 1.2 spg, .7 bpg So in the five categories you pick, Green beats Redick in the three of them. Boy, that is some stellar math there ace! I will give you that Redick has a big advantage in assists, but points can be explained very easily. Danny Green plays on the Western Conference Champions while Redick played most of the year with the team that ended up with the 2nd pick and the rest of the year with the worst playoff team in NBA History.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Aug 13, 2013 23:39:59 GMT
Oh and let us look at those stats! Redick in 2013: 14.1 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 3.8 apg, .5 spg, .1 bpg Green in 2013: 10.5 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 1.8 apg, 1.2 spg, .7 bpg So in the five categories you pick, Green beats Redick in the three of them. Boy, that is some stellar math there ace! I will give you that Redick has a big advantage in assists, but points can be explained very easily. Danny Green plays on the Western Conference Champions while Redick played most of the year with the team that ended up with the 2nd pick and the rest of the year with the worst playoff team in NBA History. Danny Green is also the product of a system. He has a very specific role on the team and that's all he does. While a lot of secondary players on good teams would improve their production if the left to take a bigger role on a smaller team, I think Danny Green would play much worse in most situations that aren't exactly like the one he's in now.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 6, 2024 1:15:37 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2013 23:54:47 GMT
Oh and let us look at those stats! Redick in 2013: 14.1 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 3.8 apg, .5 spg, .1 bpg Green in 2013: 10.5 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 1.8 apg, 1.2 spg, .7 bpg So in the five categories you pick, Green beats Redick in the three of them. Boy, that is some stellar math there ace! I will give you that Redick has a big advantage in assists, but points can be explained very easily. Danny Green plays on the Western Conference Champions while Redick played most of the year with the team that ended up with the 2nd pick and the rest of the year with the worst playoff team in NBA History. Danny Green is also the product of a system. He has a very specific role on the team and that's all he does. While a lot of secondary players on good teams would improve their production if the left to take a bigger role on a smaller team, I think Danny Green would play much worse in most situations that aren't exactly like the one he's in now. The key word is "I think" and, with all due respect to you Mr. English, I think he would be putting up 15 a game if he played for the Bucks or Magic.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Aug 14, 2013 2:00:15 GMT
I'll go for a 76 on Redick right now.
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Aug 16, 2013 15:04:47 GMT
75-76.
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on Aug 16, 2013 23:33:50 GMT
77, quote on first post pretty much sums it up for me.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Sept 6, 2013 19:43:44 GMT
75 75.5 76 77 77 77 77.5 78
77 average for Redick.
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Feb 14, 2014 0:54:43 GMT
Bumppp it looks like redick is still sitting at a 72.
|
|