|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 19, 2017 4:24:41 GMT
We will offer the minimum contract.
Year 1 - $815,615
Year 2 - $876,786
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 19, 2017 14:32:58 GMT
We will offer the minimum contract. Year 1 - $815,615 Year 2 - $876,786 -is this legal at this point in OSFA? Asking for a friend... No really though, because I have an offer from a team on a sub-70 player. If they aren't supposed to come to me, they should post here instead. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 19, 2017 14:47:39 GMT
We will offer the minimum contract. Year 1 - $815,615 Year 2 - $876,786 -is this legal at this point in OSFA? Asking for a friend... No really though, because I have an offer from a team on a sub-70 player. If they aren't supposed to come to me, they should post here instead. Thanks! Yeah I don't see why Regular Free Agency can't continue. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 19, 2017 17:58:30 GMT
The Rockets will offer Damien Inglis the following contract:
Year 1: $915,615
Year 2: $976,786
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 19, 2017 22:39:33 GMT
Year 1: 1,000,000
Year 2: 1,000,000
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 19, 2017 22:46:02 GMT
Year 1: 1,000,000 Year 2: 1,000,000 You have to increase it by 100k minimum per year. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 19, 2017 22:55:06 GMT
Year 1: 1,000,000 Year 2: 1,000,000 You have to increase it by 100k minimum per year. Actually, no. The MINIMUM increase is 100k. So actually your bid was invalid. So was Hanamichi's. MAXIMUM increase is the 7.5% Nowhere does it say you must put an increase in your offer. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 19, 2017 23:06:49 GMT
You have to increase it by 100k minimum per year. Actually, no. The MINIMUM increase is 100k. So actually your bid was invalid. So was Hanamichi's. MAXIMUM increase is the 7.5% Nowhere does it say you must put an increase in your offer. The 7.5% is the yearly number. The minimum increase to an offer is 100k. It's a bidding war, you have to increase it if you want the player on your team. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 19, 2017 23:29:16 GMT
Actually, no. The MINIMUM increase is 100k. So actually your bid was invalid. So was Hanamichi's. MAXIMUM increase is the 7.5% Nowhere does it say you must put an increase in your offer. The 7.5% is the yearly number. The minimum increase to an offer is 100k. It's a bidding war, you have to increase it if you want the player on your team. Yep you're right, read it wrong. I think that wording could use a little update but I'm sure you're right. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 19, 2017 23:30:46 GMT
Actually, no. The MINIMUM increase is 100k. So actually your bid was invalid. So was Hanamichi's. MAXIMUM increase is the 7.5% Nowhere does it say you must put an increase in your offer. The 7.5% is the yearly number. The minimum increase to an offer is 100k. It's a bidding war, you have to increase it if you want the player on your team. All that said, his overall offer does outbid you by more than 100k right? Your total is 1,892,401 His is 2,000,000 |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 20, 2017 2:04:58 GMT
The 7.5% is the yearly number. The minimum increase to an offer is 100k. It's a bidding war, you have to increase it if you want the player on your team. All that said, his overall offer does outbid you by more than 100k right? Your total is 1,892,401 His is 2,000,000 I don't know? I had to read it like four times to be sure what you were saying wasn't right, after I had read it 5 times to be sure I was making a valid offer. It is very confusing because it doesn't specify it much. This would all be easier if it were a closed process. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 20, 2017 23:37:01 GMT
Ian NobleCan we get some clarification on this? If I'm right, Inglis is mine and claimed, if not, Michi should come claim him...
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 21, 2017 8:33:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 21, 2017 9:24:25 GMT
Ignorance of rule excuses no one. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 21, 2017 9:58:07 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 21, 2017 15:02:58 GMT
My contract doesn't increase by a minimum of 100K? Original offer by Michi: $815,615 Y1 $876,786 Y2 Total: $1,692,401 My offer after: $915,615 Y1 $976,786 Y2 Total: $1,892,401 Mine seems to increase in both year to year and total value |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 21, 2017 15:03:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 21, 2017 15:20:17 GMT
Ian NobleI know that the contract I offered is legal, do you mean that Michi's isn't legal? Mine surely goes up $100k each year, where as Michi's doesn't
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 21, 2017 15:34:12 GMT
Year 1: 1,000,000 Year 2: 1,000,000 This was Hanamichi Sakuragi's offer right? It's the most recent? It's legal. |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jul 21, 2017 15:49:05 GMT
All offers were legal. Michi's was just the most recent, so he wins.
Offers must be 100k larger than the offer of the previous GM. That's what the 100k rule means.
Whether that is calculated with total value or yearly value is somewhat ambiguous, but I think we must assume that "an offer" refers to the total value of the contract. So, in that case, Michi's total "offer" did increase by at least 100k from Charles's previous offer, making it valid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 21, 2017 16:18:25 GMT
All offers were legal. Michi's was just the most recent, so he wins. Offers must be 100k larger than the offer of the previous GM. That's what the 100k rule means. Whether that is calculated with total value or yearly value is somewhat ambiguous, but I think we must assume that "an offer" refers to the total value of the contract. So, in that case, Michi's total "offer" did increase by at least 100k from Charles's previous offer, making it valid. yeah I get that Ian had said mine was illegal, which is what I wasn't sure he was talking about The question was if Michi's 1 million per year offer was legal, which i guess it is. so good for him |
|
Cleveland Cavaliers
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
Charlotte Hornets
