|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 7, 2017 22:51:19 GMT
BKN trades
75 Sean Kilpatrick $8,010,000 $7,128,900 $6,344,721 DAL 2020 2nd
PHX trades
80 Zach Randolph $16,500,293
Accept, theres a guy I wanna gamble on at 58 and Kil is decent for BKN. This is contingent on the Lal Phx trade passing
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jul 7, 2017 22:56:32 GMT
lmao how is the LAL PHX trade supposed to be passable when there's so obviously a better market there for randolph
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 7, 2017 22:57:32 GMT
via mobile
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jul 7, 2017 22:57:32 GMT
I accept. I saw Randolph getting thrown around as a salary dump yesterday so I decided to see if i could get him for cheap. I feel like I'll be able to move him for more value than this if i put the time in, and worst case scenario I can just cut him and this trade was a salary dump.
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 7, 2017 23:03:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 7, 2017 23:03:51 GMT
lmao how is the LAL PHX trade supposed to be passable when there's so obviously a better market there for randolph magic wants to clear cap, I'm taking on salary for this. In the Lal-Phx trade I'm taking on max money for a 1st.
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 7, 2017 23:04:13 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 7, 2017 23:04:13 GMT
lmao how is the LAL PHX trade supposed to be passable when there's so obviously a better market there for randolph magic wants to clear cap, I'm taking on salary for this. In the Lal-Phx trade I'm taking on max money for a 1st.
|
|
|
Post by JR Wiles on Jul 7, 2017 23:59:18 GMT
Randolph worth way more...
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 8, 2017 0:02:37 GMT
If he was worth alot than teams other than the Kings would want him irl
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 8, 2017 0:52:58 GMT
lmao how is the LAL PHX trade supposed to be passable when there's so obviously a better market there for randolph magic wants to clear cap, I'm taking on salary for this. In the Lal-Phx trade I'm taking on max money for a 1st. Feel like you posting this makes that trade look bad, prolly shoulda waited until the other gets accepted
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 8, 2017 0:58:17 GMT
magic wants to clear cap, I'm taking on salary for this. In the Lal-Phx trade I'm taking on max money for a 1st. Feel like you posting this makes that trade look bad, prolly shoulda waited until the other gets accepted I know, I waited a bit and theres 2 accepts so far. But tbh this shouldn't effect the other verdict because these are different types of trades
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 8, 2017 1:05:58 GMT
Feel like you posting this makes that trade look bad, prolly shoulda waited until the other gets accepted I know, I waited a bit and theres 2 accepts so far. But tbh this shouldn't effect the other verdict because these are different types of trades IMO that other trade should be rejected. Its absolutely awful and highway robbery for yourself, evidence more in this trade. Which I guess means you're being a good GM
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 8, 2017 9:35:53 GMT
A big expiring contract of a still talented declining veteran like Zach Randolph is worth a lot more to a contender than a deadweight contract and #58. I reject.
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 8, 2017 14:53:33 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 14:53:33 GMT
I'm on the edge but I think Kilpatrick hurts this just enough that it could be a reject.
That said, I'm not voting yet.
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 8, 2017 15:01:10 GMT
via mobile
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jul 8, 2017 15:01:10 GMT
I know you guys don't watch the Nets but for the record, Kilpatrick averaged 13/4/2 last year in 25 minutes. His per 36 is 19/6/3 and he is 27 years old. Wouldn't exactly call him dead weight.
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Jul 8, 2017 15:35:07 GMT
You guys can be a bunch of Nazis sometimes. There's no way this trade is rejectable.
I think the trade committee should work like an ideal jury. Is this trade rejectable beyond a reasonable doubt? No.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 16:30:57 GMT
I know you guys don't watch the Nets but for the record, Kilpatrick averaged 13/4/2 last year in 25 minutes. His per 36 is 19/6/3 and he is 27 years old. Wouldn't exactly call him dead weight. Josh, you are probably the single biggest purveyor of the "stats on a terrible team mean little to nothing" in this league. It was always your biggest gripe against Kevin Love's rating. Yet here you are talking up a player on one of the worst teams in the league last year who wasn't even able to carve out a starting role. He was a rotational player, with OK stats, but my biggest beef is his 41.5% FG and just average 34.1% from 3. 27 means the upside is gone, and while his 2.2 apg are OK, then 1.9 TO that accompanied it show he's a pretty flawed player. He's a backup on one of the worst teams in the league type of player. His salary is a bit of a negative, the pick is a total flyer, and ZBo can still play a bit and has a valuable contract. IJS.
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 8, 2017 17:24:54 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 8, 2017 17:24:54 GMT
I like kilpatrick, Zbo doesn't fit with my current plans because of his age but Kilpatrick will probably start for me. If this gets rejected that's ridiculous
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 8, 2017 17:51:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 17:51:48 GMT
I like kilpatrick, Zbo doesn't fit with my current plans because of his age but Kilpatrick will probably start for me. If this gets rejected that's ridiculous What do you like about him?
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 8, 2017 17:54:16 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 17:54:16 GMT
I'm still thinking about this, no vote from me yet.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 8, 2017 18:00:33 GMT
I like kilpatrick, Zbo doesn't fit with my current plans because of his age but Kilpatrick will probably start for me. If this gets rejected that's ridiculous What do you like about him? 34% from 3, 84 from the line and he has room to grow. If he can get like a 78 rating at one point then I can trade him to a contending team
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 18:08:35 GMT
What do you like about him? 34% from 3, 84 from the line and he has room to grow. If he can get like a 78 rating at one point then I can trade him to a contending team You don't think it's more likely that a 27 year old with a career 34% from 3, a career basically 1-1 ast/to rate, doesn't really get defensive stats, poor FG% as well... Isn't it more likely he just fades out of the league when the Nets get a little better and don't bring him back? Or at least more likely that he gets fewer minutes rather than more. I'm still thinking about it but this guy isn't good for much other than FT shooting. Aside from that he looks average/replaceable or below average across the board, and at 27 doesn't have much of an argument for potential aside from the fact that no other teams really took a chance on him out of college. 4 games with Minnesota in 2014-15 an d8 games with Denver in 2015-16. Hes a 10-day contract guy who stuck on the horrible Nets because he was cheap.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jul 8, 2017 18:11:09 GMT
Hes a 10-day contract guy who stuck on the horrible Nets because he was cheap. This isn't true at all. He was one of our better players last year and had a bunch of 20+ point games (and even a 38 point game).
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 18:17:31 GMT
Hes a 10-day contract guy who stuck on the horrible Nets because he was cheap. This isn't true at all. He was one of our better players last year and had a bunch of 20+ point games (and even a 38 point game). Lol. Real life Nets is what I was talking about.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jul 8, 2017 18:20:21 GMT
This isn't true at all. He was one of our better players last year and had a bunch of 20+ point games (and even a 38 point game). Lol. Real life Nets is what I was talking about. Me too
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 8, 2017 18:27:27 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 18:27:27 GMT
Lol. Real life Nets is what I was talking about. Me too OK fine. I will again point to how horrible a team he was on, your favorite argument against players on bad teams that you don't like.
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on Jul 8, 2017 19:18:24 GMT
I'll Accept- I don't like it, but I don't think it's damaging enough to reject. Kilpatrick's contract is practically a decreasing MLE, equivalent of about 5m pre salary cap-jump. I doubt I would've rejected a 5m deal back then, not doing it now.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jul 8, 2017 20:24:34 GMT
Kilpatrick is not dead weight and his contract isn't that bad since it's declining. A solid bench player making $6-7 mil is fine in the current market. There is probably a better offer out there for Randolph, but I don't think it's our position to grade trades. We judge on a pass/fail metric where the only thing that matters is if it's good enough. This one makes it over the bar imo. I accept.
|
|
|
BKN-PHX
Jul 8, 2017 20:41:26 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 8, 2017 20:41:26 GMT
Eh. I suppose I don't like anyone in this trade and also hard to say anyone is really hurting themselves THAT much.
I'll accept.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 8, 2017 21:12:04 GMT
Wow! Trade passed marginally.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 9, 2017 3:12:27 GMT
2nd round pick changed from 58 to 2020 Dal 2nd
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 9, 2017 3:12:44 GMT
is that okay?
|
|