Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 14:46:06 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 13:30:54 GMT
I'll just drop this here... You liked your own post I have the most likes in the league! And the best post/like ratio!
|
|
|
Post by JR Wiles on Jun 25, 2017 14:00:34 GMT
Sorry Boss...
As I said IT isnt being traded AT ALL. Even more so to end with another team.
I do value lottery picks by the way...just not for my favorite player and All-Star Isaiah Thomas.
Best of luck though Boss.
Pick on...😎
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 14:46:06 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2017 14:01:05 GMT
I'll just drop this here... Ian Noble, can I just have both? Pretty please?
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 25, 2017 17:11:27 GMT
Sorry for taking so long guys
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 25, 2017 21:00:12 GMT
Anyone else think 48 hours is a little excessive? We say this every year. We need to actually do something about it. The 2018 draft needs a 24 hour time limit for the top picks. It's especially excessive because these picks aren't really on the clock for 48 hours, they're on the clock for weeks. We've all known forever that Fultz and Ball are going 1 and 2, so the 3rd pick has been on the clock since Ian Noble held the lottery over three weeks ago.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 25, 2017 21:09:58 GMT
Anyone else think 48 hours is a little excessive? 100%
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 25, 2017 21:22:36 GMT
With the 3rd Pick in the 2017 Dynasty Five Draft the Boston Celtics select Josh Jackson@riogho on the clock!
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 25, 2017 21:31:38 GMT
With the 3rd Pick in the 2017 Dynasty Five Draft the Boston Celtics select Josh Jackson@riogho on the clock! Nice! I assume you had Jackson rated higher then Celtics taking Tatum just messed things up? I think Jackson is better too, he's more of a complete player that just needs to develop his shooting stroke. Tatum is a better pure scorer, but he doesn't add much else. He also wasn't that efficient, so if he's only a good scorer as a result of volume, then that doesn't really help your team. Both are great prospects though, at the end of the day.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 25, 2017 21:39:27 GMT
With the 3rd Pick in the 2017 Dynasty Five Draft the Boston Celtics select Josh Jackson@riogho on the clock! Nice! I assume you had Jackson rated higher then Celtics taking Tatum just messed things up? I think Jackson is better too, he's more of a complete player that just needs to develop his shooting stroke. Tatum is a better pure scorer, but he doesn't add much else. He also wasn't that efficient, so if he's only a good scorer as a result of volume, then that doesn't really help your team. Both are great prospects though, at the end of the day. Absolutely - Celtics taking Tatum really threw me. In fact trading down from 1 really threw me. But the effect of whether Tatum or Jackson is "better" after this move was marginalised by the fact that Jackson stiffed the Celtics on his pre-draft workout, so whether or not Danny Ainge thought Tatum was better was not obvious, he may well prefer Jackson. Tatum's going to be developed better, be surrounded by better people and get more attention for sure, he's also got a better attitude in general. But I liked Jackson's "blue-collar" ferociousness and "quick-twitch" athleticism. Tatum's got a better offensive repertoire, but Jackson's not bad with a step back or a floater either, and he's a better passer and has better vision. Tatum's got the length and frame though. It was almost impossible to draw a line between them, but I've gone with the guy who could impress sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jun 25, 2017 22:54:11 GMT
Nice! I assume you had Jackson rated higher then Celtics taking Tatum just messed things up? I think Jackson is better too, he's more of a complete player that just needs to develop his shooting stroke. Tatum is a better pure scorer, but he doesn't add much else. He also wasn't that efficient, so if he's only a good scorer as a result of volume, then that doesn't really help your team. Both are great prospects though, at the end of the day. Absolutely - Celtics taking Tatum really threw me. In fact trading down from 1 really threw me. But the effect of whether Tatum or Jackson is "better" after this move was marginalised by the fact that Jackson stiffed the Celtics on his pre-draft workout, so whether or not Danny Ainge thought Tatum was better was not obvious, he may well prefer Jackson. Tatum's going to be developed better, be surrounded by better people and get more attention for sure, he's also got a better attitude in general. But I liked Jackson's "blue-collar" ferociousness and "quick-twitch" athleticism. Tatum's got a better offensive repertoire, but Jackson's not bad with a step back or a floater either, and he's a better passer and has better vision. Tatum's got the length and frame though. It was almost impossible to draw a line between them, but I've gone with the guy who could impress sooner rather than later. Hate to burst your bubble but the Celtics have drafted a wing in the first round since James Young and none have materialized to anything near their potential. Even Jaylen Brown struggled and didn't play well. Hunter was cut, so was Young but they brought him back. They also have Yabusele, and Ojele.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 14:46:06 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2017 0:30:09 GMT
fucking christ
4 OTB
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 26, 2017 1:11:30 GMT
I hear Zach LaVine is available for a top 5 pick.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jun 26, 2017 1:32:15 GMT
At least 3 players still available will be top 2 picks in at least 3 of the last 4 drafts...
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jun 26, 2017 1:36:27 GMT
At least 3 players still available will be top 2 picks in at least 3 of the last 4 drafts... nah people were really high on both Simmons and Ingram last year
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 14:46:06 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2017 2:18:37 GMT
I'll take Tatum
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jun 26, 2017 2:30:22 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 26, 2017 19:16:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 26, 2017 19:22:13 GMT
32 hours to go, unfortunately. We should reduce the time limit for these top picks, but as of now, it's still 48 hours. The good news is once Kareem Abdul-Jabbar makes his pick we're down to the 12 hour time limit.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 26, 2017 20:37:54 GMT
Just pick someone Kareem, your team needs all sorts of talent. Trust your big board.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 26, 2017 21:09:26 GMT
Just pick someone Kareem, your team needs all sorts of talent. Trust your big board. He's trading his pick to ATL
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 26, 2017 23:02:29 GMT
The trade has enough accept votes. Jay Z on the clock
|
|
Spike Lee
Former Knicks GM
Sophomore
Posts: 366
Sept 15, 2018 22:53:48 GMT
|
Post by Spike Lee on Jun 26, 2017 23:08:48 GMT
you guys are so impatient lol
|
|
|
Post by Jay Z on Jun 26, 2017 23:13:57 GMT
Super impatient. Fox is the pick.
Sent from my LG-H918 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 26, 2017 23:26:27 GMT
you guys are so impatient lol I guess? But it's been 4 days since the draft started and we've only made 5 picks. It should be good now that we're down to the 12 hour clock, the draft will have a steady pace to it. The first 5 picks every year move at the pace of a glacier.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 26, 2017 23:42:10 GMT
you guys are so impatient lol You pick yet?
|
|
Spike Lee
Former Knicks GM
Sophomore
Posts: 366
Sept 15, 2018 22:53:48 GMT
|
Post by Spike Lee on Jun 27, 2017 0:01:38 GMT
DSJ
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 27, 2017 1:32:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Jun 27, 2017 3:30:51 GMT
With the 7th Pick in D5 2017 NBA Sim League Draft
The Washington Wizards selects
SF JONATHAN ISAAC from Florida State University
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Jun 27, 2017 3:34:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 27, 2017 4:19:11 GMT
Why even be up if you took my guy ^^
|
|