|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 14, 2017 16:49:52 GMT
Averages more points than Devin Booker and though thats the only stat that matters I'll point out he does it at nearly 50%
85
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 14, 2017 17:35:00 GMT
Already had an increase thread
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 14, 2017 19:24:24 GMT
But did you hear he averages more than Booke so he's automatically way better. We need to adjust.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 15, 2017 0:14:26 GMT
Hope it was to 85.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Apr 21, 2017 11:20:42 GMT
It was only to 82 unfortunately. Beal should be an 85 imho, my opinion on him has improved hugely recently, although I barely ever watch Wizards games mind |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Apr 21, 2017 14:56:07 GMT
But did you hear he averages more than Booke so he's automatically way better. We need to adjust. you need to stop making a mockery of the stock watch all because some people don't agree with you. Not everyone cares about what you have to say nor do they even need to listen to you |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Apr 21, 2017 17:40:32 GMT
Chuck stop being an abrasive arsehole  |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 23, 2017 2:09:15 GMT
But did you hear he averages more than Booke so he's automatically way better. We need to adjust. you need to stop making a mockery of the stock watch all because some people don't agree with you. Not everyone cares about what you have to say nor do they even need to listen to you Oh all of a sudden when I use the same logic everyone else is using I'm making a mockery of the stock watch. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Apr 23, 2017 2:21:11 GMT
you need to stop making a mockery of the stock watch all because some people don't agree with you. Not everyone cares about what you have to say nor do they even need to listen to you Oh all of a sudden when I use the same logic everyone else is using I'm making a mockery of the stock watch. You made like 10 threads with the basis that they were better than Booker. Did they all actually warrant a thread? No. They all didn't need threads. But the ones that did, the reasoning for making them shouldn't be because some one pissed you off. Plus, if you are going to make a thread, you can't just say so and so is better than Devin Booker and he is now an 80. You need to put some effort in showing why they warrant an increase, even though some GMs do this. Additionally, Booker isn't actually changed yet, so the basis of those arguments are weak, because if there a more votes in line with your thinking, it is all for naught. The reality of the situation is that people disagreed with you, so you made a whole bunch of stock watch threads trying to prove your point, but not really doing so, nor making anything better. The stock watch isn't based in fact, it is based in opinion. So long as this holds true, any attempt to find reason will be fruitless. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 14:30:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2017 4:10:13 GMT
What threads
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 23, 2017 4:24:02 GMT
Oh all of a sudden when I use the same logic everyone else is using I'm making a mockery of the stock watch. You made like 10 threads with the basis that they were better than Booker. Did they all actually warrant a thread? No. They all didn't need threads. But the ones that did, the reasoning for making them shouldn't be because some one pissed you off. Plus, if you are going to make a thread, you can't just say so and so is better than Devin Booker and he is now an 80. You need to put some effort in showing why they warrant an increase, even though some GMs do this. Additionally, Booker isn't actually changed yet, so the basis of those arguments are weak, because if there a more votes in line with your thinking, it is all for naught. The reality of the situation is that people disagreed with you, so you made a whole bunch of stock watch threads trying to prove your point, but not really doing so, nor making anything better. The stock watch isn't based in fact, it is based in opinion. So long as this holds true, any attempt to find reason will be fruitless. If the last bolded part is the most important than I don't need to put any reasoning for why I think someone should be increased. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 23, 2017 4:30:31 GMT
And furthermore I went above and beyond in showing why the Booker votes didn't really make any sense.
Those players arguments are in that thread. The others were just me going down the roster list and checking each players stats and then putting in a thread.
Because I'm apparently the only honest person putting in stockwatches for my players and paying attention. I figured I would make sure that other players are getting attention.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Roy on May 4, 2017 8:38:17 GMT
86
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on May 4, 2017 11:09:57 GMT
83
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on May 23, 2017 11:44:03 GMT
86
|
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Jun 29, 2017 15:56:21 GMT
Beal is legit. 85
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jun 30, 2017 1:32:51 GMT
84
|
|
New Orleans Pelicans
Boston Celtics
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
