|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 15, 2017 1:30:45 GMT
Current Rating: 78
Suggested Rating: 80
His ratings are kind of screwy. He's a defensive specialist but his offensive and defensive awareness are the same.
He's having a career shooting year 42% OVR and 40% from 3. His inside scoring can probably stay the same but give him a boost to his 3pt shooting and fix his specialization. Maybe drop his offensive awareness to give him a true specialization in defense? IDK.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Roy on Feb 15, 2017 1:38:30 GMT
80
|
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Feb 15, 2017 2:15:02 GMT
78
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Feb 15, 2017 2:23:46 GMT
76.
This guy is not an 80. He's a defensive specialist that isn't even that good defensively. He's pretty good I guess, but not elite. His career shooting percentage is 39.7%. The fact that 42.8% is a career for his shooting says everything right there. His great three point shooting also seems like a fluke to be honest, he shot 29.5% last year and 34.5% is his career average. He's no Tony Allen, and we never rated Tony Allen 80+.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 15, 2017 3:54:18 GMT
77
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Feb 15, 2017 4:35:31 GMT
His defensive rating is rather piss poor in the sim, it's a 68, which is probably lower than half the league. I don't think he needs decreased, that is for sure, but i think a 79 would be good to increase his defense. If you look at his sim stats, where would you lower him? All his ratings besides defense seem pretty good where they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 15, 2017 6:49:20 GMT
I was just really surprised at how well he's been shooting the ball (he's shooting it from 3 more than any of his other seasons.) Where normally he gets the ball and I go NO NO NO NO NO NO. I'm now not panicking. His defense is pretty good and that was his billing I just thought his ratings looked kind of weird after digging into it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 15, 2017 12:00:54 GMT
78
Willing to adjust if he stays at a 78 but also don't feel he needs a higher rating, just on gut feeling. I have not looked at the ratings individually.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 15, 2017 12:23:04 GMT
78 Willing to adjust if he stays at a 78 but also don't feel he needs a higher rating, just on gut feeling. I have not looked at the ratings individually. I only looked at offense and defense. I feel like the majority of his points are in athleticism but he really doesn't play that athletic if that makes sense. Maybe use some of those move them to his sklls a bit. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Feb 15, 2017 14:46:23 GMT
I could see his speed dropping to around an 84 and maybe his quick to an 84, but it is really hard to pick where else just because everything is so spread out for him. He isn't good in any one area rating wise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Feb 15, 2017 17:14:26 GMT
78
|
|
Utah Jazz
Denver Nuggets
New Orleans Pelicans
Minnesota Timberwolves
LA Clippers
