|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 26, 2017 4:40:14 GMT
Current: 77
I dont have a problem with the overall rating, my problem is with the 71 = 3PT!
The guy is shooting 40.9% 3FG this season. He is a career 40.4% three-point shooter. After his rookie season, he averaged more than two three-pointers per 36 minutes per game every season.
I just want that to be right. Eric Gordon has 87 3PT and his career 3PT% is 38.5%. Conley has 88 3PT and he is a career 37.6% 3PT.
Suggestion: 79 3PT: at least 90.
Thank you.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 26, 2017 5:38:29 GMT
Current: 77 I dont have a problem with the overall rating, my problem is with the 71 = 3PT! The guy is shooting 40.9% 3FG this season. He is a career 40.4% three-point shooter. After his rookie season, he averaged more than two three-pointers per 36 minutes per game every season. I just want that to be right. Eric Gordon has 87 3PT and his career 3PT% is 38.5%. Conley has 88 3PT and he is a career 37.6% 3PT. Suggestion: 79 3PT: at least 90. Thank you. Nice finds Hana. 77-78 to adjust his scoring to be more in line with reality. I also have no problem with Walt going in and adjusting those two guards down as well.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 26, 2017 19:30:46 GMT
Current: 77 I dont have a problem with the overall rating, my problem is with the 71 = 3PT! The guy is shooting 40.9% 3FG this season. He is a career 40.4% three-point shooter. After his rookie season, he averaged more than two three-pointers per 36 minutes per game every season. I just want that to be right. Eric Gordon has 87 3PT and his career 3PT% is 38.5%. Conley has 88 3PT and he is a career 37.6% 3PT. Suggestion: 79 3PT: at least 90. Thank you. I want to make sure this is clear, 3-point rating is not based on career three-point percentage. Generally, we are adjusting these players often enough that I am basing it on the current season where they were changed. That being said, there are times where is season just looks like an outlier so I will sometimes use career 3-point percentage or whatever stat I'm working on to base the rating on. Just wanted to make that clear, generally it's based on the current season percentage not the career percentage.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 26, 2017 19:31:36 GMT
I vote 77,with intention to modify ratings .
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jan 26, 2017 20:44:27 GMT
Do I suggest a 3pt rating change?
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 27, 2017 0:27:19 GMT
Do I suggest a 3pt rating change? Just vote for a 77 Jared. Walt will do the work
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 27, 2017 0:33:30 GMT
Current: 77 I dont have a problem with the overall rating, my problem is with the 71 = 3PT! The guy is shooting 40.9% 3FG this season. He is a career 40.4% three-point shooter. After his rookie season, he averaged more than two three-pointers per 36 minutes per game every season. I just want that to be right. Eric Gordon has 87 3PT and his career 3PT% is 38.5%. Conley has 88 3PT and he is a career 37.6% 3PT. Suggestion: 79 3PT: at least 90. Thank you. I want to make sure this is clear, 3-point rating is not based on career three-point percentage. Generally, we are adjusting these players often enough that I am basing it on the current season where they were changed. That being said, there are times where is season just looks like an outlier so I will sometimes use career 3-point percentage or whatever stat I'm working on to base the rating on. Just wanted to make that clear, generally it's based on the current season percentage not the career percentage. Thanks Walt!
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jan 27, 2017 1:32:56 GMT
79
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Jan 27, 2017 3:17:22 GMT
I vote 77,with intention to modify ratings . I agree with this...77 with specific 3 pt rating raised.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 5, 2017 8:51:02 GMT
bump
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Feb 5, 2017 18:03:01 GMT
77
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Roy on Feb 15, 2017 1:43:18 GMT
78
|
|