|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Dec 30, 2016 3:17:29 GMT
Currently sitting at an 85!!!
Needs to come down, soon.
18.5 PPG, 3 APG, 6.3 RPG on 45.5/34.5/84.7 FG/3PT/FT %'s
1.5 Steals per game though, and 0.7 Blocks per game. But I do not think these numbers warrant Rudy being an 85. Time to nerf.
Suggested Rating: 80
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Dec 30, 2016 3:24:55 GMT
83
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Dec 30, 2016 3:26:44 GMT
79
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Dec 30, 2016 4:33:56 GMT
81, he's not the best on defense. Hard to judge him based on his current effort which is clearly "I'm on the Kings" effort.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Rudy Gay
Dec 30, 2016 4:43:51 GMT
via mobile
Post by Kevin Hollis on Dec 30, 2016 4:43:51 GMT
81
|
|
|
|
Rudy Gay
Dec 30, 2016 4:52:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 30, 2016 4:52:41 GMT
83
|
|
|
|
Rudy Gay
Dec 30, 2016 10:33:45 GMT
via mobile
Post by Danny Longley on Dec 30, 2016 10:33:45 GMT
Considering where the other wings are, sure, 83.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Dec 30, 2016 18:52:52 GMT
Considering where the other wings are, sure, 83. But they shouldn't be there. If we base ratings off of current players who need changed, everything gets fucked up. Looking at Trevor Ariza, and basing Rudy's rating off of that is going to lead to skewed ratings. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Dec 30, 2016 18:54:17 GMT
He's still ok, he's just trapped on the Kings. 82
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Dec 30, 2016 18:56:53 GMT
81, he's not the best on defense. Hard to judge him based on his current effort which is clearly "I'm on the Kings" effort. Basing his performance on his effort is what you have to do though. You have nothing else to go off of. And I understand that Rudy does this when he is on a team that sucks, but how do we know that this isn't his full effort? At what point do we begin to rate players on their potential and not their performance? Yes, Rudy has it in him to average 22 a night, but he isn't averaging 22 a night and playing good defense. You have to rate them on who they are currently. Not what they were or what they could become. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Dec 30, 2016 19:02:46 GMT
He's still ok, he's just trapped on the Kings. 82 If him being on the Kings is an excuse for his numbers dropping, why hasn't DeMarcus Cousins' numbers dropped? This him being on the Kings excuse is asinine. |
|
|
|
Rudy Gay
Dec 30, 2016 19:18:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Dec 30, 2016 19:18:41 GMT
He's still ok, he's just trapped on the Kings. 82 If him being on the Kings is an excuse for his numbers dropping, why hasn't DeMarcus Cousins' numbers dropped? This him being on the Kings excuse is asinine. Its hard because I just worked to get a great defender whos averaging 17ppg up to an 83. This guy is 81 for me cause he has 1 ppg more and isn't totally trash. |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on Jan 3, 2017 19:29:18 GMT
Considering where the other wings are, sure, 83. But they shouldn't be there. If we base ratings off of current players who need changed, everything gets fucked up. Looking at Trevor Ariza, and basing Rudy's rating off of that is going to lead to skewed ratings. It's not like I'm unaware of the context behind those ratings - I think that Rudy is about as effective on the court overall as the likes of Hou/Was Ariza, Pre-PG Giannis and last year's Gordon Hayward. He hasn't actually fallen off in any way in terms of production, but the overall does feel high as a second fiddle for what the Kings achieve, so yeah, 83. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:54:57 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2017 21:30:14 GMT
80
|
|
Charlotte Hornets
New Orleans Pelicans
Minnesota Timberwolves
Dallas Mavericks
Boston Celtics
