|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jul 18, 2016 3:17:21 GMT
Spurs draft and stash from a few years back. Coming over this season, needs a rating so we can add him to OSFA.
Google him if you want to know about him and care to vote.
I vote a 72
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:54:09 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2016 3:33:47 GMT
74 but could be better.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 18, 2016 12:45:45 GMT
Gonna stay conservative like we are now trying with all incoming Rookies.
69
If he's better we can bump him up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 18, 2016 12:52:37 GMT
I've not followed this guy at all but, as a rule, I would not give a guy who drafted at #46, five years ago, a rating above 70.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:54:09 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2016 13:25:34 GMT
I've not followed this guy at all but, as a rule, I would not give a guy who drafted at #46, five years ago, a rating above 70. But but but he is dope |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 18, 2016 14:02:19 GMT
I've not followed this guy at all but, as a rule, I would not give a guy who drafted at #46, five years ago, a rating above 70. Yep. I went as high as 69 only b/c these two seem kind of high on him. Again, we'll bump guys up if they're better, but if they're not, it does more damage to have a "too good" rating for a bad player than a "not high enough" rating for a solid player. Easier to bump them up incrementally basically. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jul 24, 2016 12:15:54 GMT
69
|
|
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
