Glenn Robinson
Milwaukee Bucks
Starter
Posts: 1,226
Nov 22, 2024 4:29:32 GMT
|
Post by Glenn Robinson on Jan 22, 2016 1:29:25 GMT
Milwaukee Trades:
(79) Patrick Beverly - $5,500,000 - $5,000,000 (76) Marcus Morris - $4,094,020
Total: $9,594,020
Milwaukee Receives:
(77) Avery Bradley - $9,000,000 - $8,010,000 - $7,200,000 - $6,500,000 - $6,000,000
Total: $9,000,000
Cleveland Trades:
(77) Avery Bradley - $9,000,000 - $8,010,000 - $7,200,000 - $6,500,000 - $6,000,000
Total: $9,000,000
Cleveland Receives:
(79) Patrick Beverly - $5,500,000 - $5,000,000 (76) Marcus Morris - $4,094,020
Total: $9,594,020
I accept. I'm a big fan of Avery Bradley. While I like the combination of Beverly and Morris, I likely won't have the means to re-sign them in the off-season, whereas Cleveland will have the cap space to do so.
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 22, 2016 2:01:30 GMT
Hmm... don't wanna pick on Hanamichi but I don't really like this for Cle! I thought Avery was a solid part of his team.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 28, 2024 0:36:42 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2016 2:18:41 GMT
>trades his one good player to make james kay eat a shoe
You're a God, Hana.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 22, 2016 3:03:55 GMT
Doesn't make much sense for cleveland.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 22, 2016 4:25:30 GMT
I think this is fair enough that I don't need to explain that much. So, I accept.
But, I will unravel some.
1st, I really need a legit PG that the simulator recognize to be a PG. I also wants to build my team with players who can play defense but can also help in offense and Beverley fits very well.
2ndly, I want James to eat a shoe.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jan 22, 2016 4:35:09 GMT
what's this james eating his shoe thing?
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 22, 2016 4:41:58 GMT
what's this james eating his shoe thing? He will eat his shoe if I made the playoffs. He shouts that in the shoutbox and I have an evidence.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 22, 2016 5:22:34 GMT
I think this is fair enough that I don't need to explain that much. So, I accept. But, I will unravel some. 1st, I really need a legit PG that the simulator recognize to be a PG. I also wants to build my team with players who can play defense but can also help in offense and Beverley fits very well. 2ndly, I want James to eat a shoe. Avery Bradley is better on Defense and Offense than Pat Beverly though.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 22, 2016 5:32:21 GMT
I think this is fair enough that I don't need to explain that much. So, I accept. But, I will unravel some. 1st, I really need a legit PG that the simulator recognize to be a PG. I also wants to build my team with players who can play defense but can also help in offense and Beverley fits very well. 2ndly, I want James to eat a shoe. Avery Bradley is better on Defense and Offense than Pat Beverly though. Maybe, but he is not recognize as a PG here. Beverley is also improving in his shooting which gave me the message that this guy is working hard.
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 22, 2016 5:47:34 GMT
Avery Bradley is better on Defense and Offense than Pat Beverly though. Maybe, but he is not recognize as a PG here. Beverley is also improving in his shooting which gave me the message that this guy is working hard. There is no real recognition of a PG per the sim attributes. Its about how you have them set in your lineup. Bradley doesn't really posses a defined skill set, and therefore, he doesn't have a defined position. He isn't Russell Westbrook good at things, so it doesn't really work out for him. I think the trade isn't that bad. It makes sense. I don't like Avery Bradley and think he is eventually traded in about a month in RL, either him or Smart.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 22, 2016 12:14:10 GMT
Maybe, but he is not recognize as a PG here. Beverley is also improving in his shooting which gave me the message that this guy is working hard. There is no real recognition of a PG per the sim attributes. Its about how you have them set in your lineup. Bradley doesn't really posses a defined skill set, and therefore, he doesn't have a defined position. He isn't Russell Westbrook good at things, so it doesn't really work out for him. I think the trade isn't that bad. It makes sense. I don't like Avery Bradley and think he is eventually traded in about a month in RL, either him or Smart. Actually I get what Hanamichi's saying. Bradley just has above-average passing attribute IIRC whereas Beverley is recognized as a point guard first and foremost and his passing is probably a lot better, I haven't checked cos I'm at work but it's probably true. I actually feel like Bradley's being overrated a bit, even as a C's fan saying that. He's the best player here but not by enough to reject. I accept.
|
|
|
MIL - CLE
Jan 22, 2016 12:45:54 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 22, 2016 12:45:54 GMT
Yea, accept also
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Jan 22, 2016 13:29:39 GMT
accept
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 22, 2016 13:31:29 GMT
that was quick. thanks!
Thanks Glenn "THE NINJA"!
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 22, 2016 13:42:52 GMT
by the way, I will need to release 1 so maybe there is someone out there who wants to get Karasev or Muscala for a 2nd?
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 22, 2016 14:09:11 GMT
by the way, I will need to release 1 so maybe there is someone out there who wants to get Karasev or Muscala for a 2nd? Nope, no one like that exists
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 22, 2016 14:10:16 GMT
by the way, I will need to release 1 so maybe there is someone out there who wants to get Karasev or Muscala for a 2nd? Nope, no one like that exists
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 23, 2016 11:27:45 GMT
Trade passed.
|
|