|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 16, 2016 20:38:23 GMT
He can't shoot very well (players with huge hands seem to be handicapped like that I reckon, ie. Shaq, Rondo, Giannis) but he's the best player on the Bucks and can guard every position. In fact Jabari's just been given the role of guarding the best wing player for the opposition and Giannis has been moved to the role of interior defender recently. I watch a lot of Bucks games.
82
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 16, 2016 20:52:49 GMT
81.5
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 16, 2016 22:52:51 GMT
but he's the best player on the Bucks mfw  |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 16, 2016 22:53:07 GMT
81
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 17, 2016 9:41:57 GMT
but he's the best player on the Bucks mfw Disagree! |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 17, 2016 19:16:22 GMT
mfw Disagree! I'm waiting to post a stock watch thread on Midleton, but he's going to be due for a huge increase if he keeps his level of play up. He had an admittedly slow start to the season, but the last 20 games he's averaged: 21.5 points, 4.8 assists, 3.7 rbds, 1.1 stls, shooting .494 FG, .40 3P. and .872 FT There's a reason he's the Bucks leader in minutes played. Plus his facilitating has been a real area of improvement for him this year. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:32:00 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2016 19:25:30 GMT
lol james kay
anyway.
84 for giannis
|
|
Spike Lee
Former Knicks GM
Sophomore
Posts: 366 
|
Post by Spike Lee on Jan 17, 2016 22:47:02 GMT
He can't shoot very well (players with huge hands seem to be handicapped like that I reckon, ie. Shaq, Rondo, Giannis) kawhi |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 18, 2016 0:24:10 GMT
80
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Roy on Jan 18, 2016 9:56:42 GMT
81.. Very good defender.. still needs to improve his offense
|
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Jan 18, 2016 23:18:58 GMT
81 ^^
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 22, 2016 4:50:49 GMT
Tallied Closed
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 22, 2016 6:01:39 GMT
literally been open 6 days. can't close them this quickly. we aren't doing them this quickly in the ratings committee, there's no need to close them this quickly. I think he is an 82. To Ian Noble 's comment about his shooting, he may not be able to shoot, and at least he knows it. I think he's attempted all of 10 3's this year, and maybe 11 last year. He shot really well for the Greek National team which is weird |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:32:00 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2016 15:50:00 GMT
Yeah Jeremiah stop fucking closing threads if they've been open less than a week.
As far as Giannis goes, CB, he shot so well in international play probably because of his length... IIRC he shot like 50% but the sample size was like 10 attempts or some shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 22, 2016 16:03:23 GMT
Yeah Jeremiah stop fucking closing threads if they've been open less than a week. As far as Giannis goes, CB, he shot so well in international play probably because of his length... IIRC he shot like 50% but the sample size was like 10 attempts or some shit. Kind of hard to stop something I did 12 hours ago Adam. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:32:00 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2016 16:06:27 GMT
Yeah Jeremiah stop fucking closing threads if they've been open less than a week. As far as Giannis goes, CB, he shot so well in international play probably because of his length... IIRC he shot like 50% but the sample size was like 10 attempts or some shit. Kind of hard to stop something I did 12 hours ago Adam. Stop doing it in the future it's ridiculous. People who usually go through and vote on all the threads (Like Mike K) haven't voted yet. We aren't doing ratings changes every week stop closing threads in 5 or 6 days its fucking stupid. Your argument that you "lose" threads doesnt fly. You have a list of all the threads you've already closed, you can't just look and see which ones aren't on that list? |
|
Glenn Robinson
 Milwaukee Bucks
Starter
Posts: 1,226
Nov 22, 2024 4:29:32 GMT
|
Post by Glenn Robinson on Jan 22, 2016 16:13:45 GMT
It it's not too late, 81 for me.
As the resident Bucks fan on this forum that watches every game, Giannis has all the potential in the world, he just needs to be more consistent on a game-to-game basis. His shooting mechanics are good, shots just aren't falling, however, he's starting to find his shot from the perimeter as of late. Middleton is still the best player on the Bucks right now but Giannis isn't far behind and has a lot more potential. It's up to him if he can live up to that potential.
I'd go higher but his inconsistency is what's holding him back for me right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 22, 2016 20:38:27 GMT
Kind of hard to stop something I did 12 hours ago Adam. Stop doing it in the future it's ridiculous. People who usually go through and vote on all the threads (Like Mike K) haven't voted yet. We aren't doing ratings changes every week stop closing threads in 5 or 6 days its fucking stupid. Your argument that you "lose" threads doesnt fly. You have a list of all the threads you've already closed, you can't just look and see which ones aren't on that list? Its mildly inconvenient. It takes me like 45 minutes just to tally stuff and edit the thread. Things get pushed down when people vote on guys that have already been changed. If someone isn't in for 5 days then what are they doing? If they have been on in 5 days and didn't vote then what are they doing. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:32:00 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2016 20:48:39 GMT
Stop doing it in the future it's ridiculous. People who usually go through and vote on all the threads (Like Mike K) haven't voted yet. We aren't doing ratings changes every week stop closing threads in 5 or 6 days its fucking stupid. Your argument that you "lose" threads doesnt fly. You have a list of all the threads you've already closed, you can't just look and see which ones aren't on that list? Its mildly inconvenient. It takes me like 45 minutes just to tally stuff and edit the thread. Things get pushed down when people vote on guys that have already been changed. If someone isn't in for 5 days then what are they doing? If they have been on in 5 days and didn't vote then what are they doing. Just lock the threads if the guy has been changed. Problem solved. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 22, 2016 21:37:07 GMT
I can't do that.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:32:00 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2016 22:24:30 GMT
Walt Frazier we should lock threads after their ratings are changed so we dont have to close them after 5 days so jeremiah can keep up with all the threads
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 22, 2016 22:39:49 GMT
Walt Frazier we should lock threads after their ratings are changed so we dont have to close them after 5 days so jeremiah can keep up with all the threads I think it is probably a good idea too, but I don't have the power to do it either. It currently rests with one man, and one man only. Ian Noble |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 16:32:00 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2016 23:20:04 GMT
Ian, I think it's possible to make Walt a moderator of the stock watch forum only. That way he can lock the voting threads after the results are sent in to you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 23, 2016 5:47:59 GMT
Stop doing it in the future it's ridiculous. People who usually go through and vote on all the threads (Like Mike K) haven't voted yet. We aren't doing ratings changes every week stop closing threads in 5 or 6 days its fucking stupid. Your argument that you "lose" threads doesnt fly. You have a list of all the threads you've already closed, you can't just look and see which ones aren't on that list? Its mildly inconvenient. It takes me like 45 minutes just to tally stuff and edit the thread. Things get pushed down when people vote on guys that have already been changed. If someone isn't in for 5 days then what are they doing? If they have been on in 5 days and didn't vote then what are they doing. Then Ill do it. You've been relieved of your duties3 |
|
|
|
Post by Ghazny Dimalen on Jan 23, 2016 13:17:24 GMT
82 for me
|
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on Jan 25, 2016 13:11:23 GMT
83
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 30, 2016 20:08:28 GMT
Its mildly inconvenient. It takes me like 45 minutes just to tally stuff and edit the thread. Things get pushed down when people vote on guys that have already been changed. If someone isn't in for 5 days then what are they doing? If they have been on in 5 days and didn't vote then what are they doing. Then Ill do it. You've been relieved of your duties3 Fine, get on it then. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 30, 2016 20:09:53 GMT
Also, everyone is constantly bitching about how long rating changes take to get completed then I try and speed up the process a bit and all I get is crying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 30, 2016 20:12:44 GMT
79-80-80-81-81-81-81.5-82-82-83-84 = 81
My tally with the two extra votes after being open 8 more days.
Oh look, nothing has changed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 31, 2016 5:12:13 GMT
Also, everyone is constantly bitching about how long rating changes take to get completed then I try and speed up the process a bit and all I get is crying. We are in the middle of doing 12, when Walt gives me the ok that he is putting them up, I'll go through and close down the next set. breh |
|
Boston Celtics
Minnesota Timberwolves
Charlotte Hornets
Washington Wizards
