|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Jul 21, 2015 13:33:30 GMT
Shelvin Mack will sign with the Clippers!
Year 1 $510,000
Year 2 $1,010,000
Year 3 $1,510,000
Year 4 $2,010,000
Year 5 $2,510,000
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on Jul 21, 2015 15:32:14 GMT
Shelvin Mack will sign with the Clippers! Year 1 $507,336 Year 2 $1,007,336 Year 3 $1,507,336 Year 4 $2,007,336 Year 5 $2,507,336 is this allowed? |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 21, 2015 18:48:41 GMT
Shelvin Mack will sign with the Clippers! Year 1 $507,336 Year 2 $1,007,336 Year 3 $1,507,336 Year 4 $2,007,336 Year 5 $2,507,336 is this allowed? Nope. League Minimum Contract League Minimum Contract: $507,336 The maximum length of a league minimum contract is 2 years.League minimum contracts can only be offered to players rated below 70. League minimum contracts otherwise conform to the usual contract extension regulations. Bryan Colangelo / Ian Noble |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 21, 2015 18:54:19 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Jul 21, 2015 22:55:42 GMT
fixed:
Year 1 $510,000
Year 2 $1,010,000
Year 3 $1,510,000
Year 4 $2,010,000
Year 5 $2,510,000
|
|
Chris Mullin
 Golden State Warriors
Starter
Posts: 1,303
Feb 19, 2024 21:58:28 GMT
|
Post by Chris Mullin on Jul 21, 2015 23:06:22 GMT
fixed: Year 1 $510,000 Year 2 $1,010,000 Year 3 $1,510,000 Year 4 $2,010,000 Year 5 $2,510,000 How can a 74 rated player sign for the minimum? |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 21, 2015 23:08:56 GMT
fixed: Year 1 $510,000 Year 2 $1,010,000 Year 3 $1,510,000 Year 4 $2,010,000 Year 5 $2,510,000 How can a 74 rated player sign for the minimum? Technically it's not the minimum it's just (more or less) the smallest contract that isn't the minimum. Kind of shitting in the face of the spirit of the rule with this new contract. I dunno why but $750,000 feels like a better "non-minimum/minimum" contract but this contract is actually not the minimum and is not illegal as far as I know the rules to be at the moment. Ian Noble - this contract good or no? |
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Jul 21, 2015 23:09:51 GMT
from my understanding this should be fine, if not will go back and renegotiate
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 21, 2015 23:10:36 GMT
from my understanding this should be fine, if not will go back and renegotiate He's using his MLE for this, I suppose? |
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Jul 21, 2015 23:11:10 GMT
from my understanding this should be fine, if not will go back and renegotiate He's using his MLE for this, I suppose? yup |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 22, 2015 0:01:12 GMT
He's using his MLE for this, I suppose? yup Then yea I think he could make it whatever amount he wants technically. And I could be wrong but I think as long as he's using the MLE, he could technically offer the same amount as the MLE (or maybe like, one dollar more) and it would be legal. Just have to make sure you state that he's using the MLE in the first post. Should be fine, I think. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 22, 2015 7:21:04 GMT
lol technically that contract is valid, but it's a really weird one!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Jul 22, 2015 13:45:17 GMT
The contract was originally set up like it was to make sure that I was able to fit all my offers in with my MLE. Since I missed out on a bunch of free agents I was targeting, it became less of an issue as we went forward.
When I was read it was illegal, I changed it to more than the minimum to accommodate.
If you guys think it should be changed let me know (or the player agent) and we will work it out.
|
|
Toronto Raptors
Miami Heat
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
LA Clippers
