|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 10, 2015 0:28:01 GMT
Current: 88
2013-2014: 21.8 pts, 10.8 rebs, 2.1 asts, 1.1 blks 50.9 FG%
2014-2015: 17.5 pts, 8.5 rebs, 1.8 asts, 1.3 blks, 48.8 FG%
PER: 22.7 to 20.1
TS% 53.2% to 50.8%
WS: 7.8 to 3.5
I am not actually going to suggest any rating right now because he is still on his prime, maybe this is the last year. He is still at 30 years old and I dont think a player's skill will regress at this point unless you are hit with an injury or you are actually overrated last year.
I just want to know the stand of the majority about a guy who have decrease in numbers but still at his prime if that is fine.
Does he deserve a decrease?
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Feb 10, 2015 0:53:42 GMT
Does he deserve a decrease? No. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 11, 2015 2:37:55 GMT
I have to go against Alex here. I think he's an 86, he's not playing at the same level as he was last year, from the eye test. I think he's on par with Horford right now. Kind of a weird situation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Feb 11, 2015 3:10:14 GMT
85
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Feb 11, 2015 4:04:23 GMT
Would like to say he has been injured and has played a few games off the bench to control his minutes and slowly get him back.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 11, 2015 4:34:20 GMT
86 not a big decrease
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 0:43:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2015 5:08:04 GMT
Gotta love Big Al. He makes everything go.
87
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 11, 2015 5:29:17 GMT
I love the guy too actually, but 88 just feels a tad high. I'm torn between 86 and 87 so I may as well just put down an 86.5 and move on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Feb 11, 2015 7:55:03 GMT
Would love to see other facts and not just an "eye test" plus other areas to be considered before others put their rating.
I personally think he doesnt deserve a decrease yet. I think it's another scene of you guys shortchanging the veterans.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Feb 11, 2015 12:57:58 GMT
86 - soon or later veterans have to decrease in rating regardless of the name. I think an 86 is good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 11, 2015 14:35:41 GMT
It seems a lot of you are number conscious.
Now I know.
|
|
Spike Lee
Former Knicks GM
Sophomore
Posts: 366
|
Post by Spike Lee on Feb 12, 2015 1:22:11 GMT
i vote to keep him where he is. numbers are down but thats not enough to warrant a decrease imo
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 0:43:03 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2015 13:03:27 GMT
His numbers have decreased by quiet a bit but he's still better than his teammate on the 6ers, Bosh Spice, so I am going to vote for an 89!  |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Feb 17, 2015 16:52:44 GMT
88
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 27, 2015 0:10:31 GMT
bump
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 27, 2015 4:56:20 GMT
88
|
|
Chris Mullin
 Golden State Warriors
Starter
Posts: 1,303
Feb 19, 2024 21:58:28 GMT
|
Post by Chris Mullin on Mar 2, 2015 8:10:10 GMT
85
|
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Mar 4, 2015 3:05:22 GMT
86 ^^
|
|
Cleveland Cavaliers
Denver Nuggets
Brooklyn Nets
Philadelphia 76ers
New Orleans Pelicans
Minnesota Timberwolves
LA Clippers
Washington Wizards
