|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 10, 2015 2:40:22 GMT
Nick Collison is putting up 4.3 and 3.6 a game in 17 minutes but is doing it on 41.1% shooting, which is awfully low for a big man. He is fading and he doesn't have much to fade from.
Suggested Rating 71
In comparison, Cole Aldrich is putting up 6 and 5 on 51.4% shooting and is rated a 71.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 10, 2015 2:53:23 GMT
No need to compare to an older rating (older as in we haven't updated in the past month).
Collison probably is a bit high though.
72 for me.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 10, 2015 3:05:13 GMT
This was a blatant butt-hurt post. Sorry, Rose still isn't a 93.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 10, 2015 3:08:28 GMT
This was a blatant butt-hurt post. Sorry, Rose still isn't a 93. Don't know why you think it's a butt hurt post, but ok. I conceded the fact that Rose wasn't a 93 in the Rose thread. We have plenty of guys who average what Collison averages and they are rated much lower than a 75. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 10, 2015 3:30:44 GMT
Hey, I agree. He just doesn't get the minutes. I will just throw out a 73.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jan 10, 2015 4:19:18 GMT
He has really great plus minus stats and I think this is a rare instance where his traditional stats don't show his impact at all.
76
|
|
Minnesota Timberwolves
New Orleans Pelicans
