|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 10, 2015 2:38:16 GMT
Not having a good year thus far. Definitely isn't playing like a player who deserves an 86 rating.
Not even averaging a double double.
8.2/9.8/3.8/1.6/0.8 PTS/RBS/AST/BLK/STL
on 44.8% shooting and a career low 61.3% from the line.
His defense is still good and his passing is above average, but those increases we made to his offensive game need to be taken back now, as he isn't the same player as he was last season. And this is exactly why we have the RC, to have a free-flowing rating system, so that when one player falters, he his decreased and he can be increased just as easily.
My suggested rating is an 81.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 10, 2015 2:48:06 GMT
Not having a good year thus far. Definitely isn't playing like a player who deserves an 86 rating. Not even averaging a double double. 8.2/9.8/3.8/1.6/0.8 PTS/RBS/AST/BLK/STL on 44.8% shooting and a career low 61.3% from the line. His defense is still good and his passing is above average, but those increases we made to his offensive game need to be taken back now, as he isn't the same player as he was last season. And this is exactly why we have the RC, to have a free-flowing rating system, so that when one player falters, he his decreased and he can be increased just as easily.My suggested rating is an 81. That is not happening at the moment. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 10, 2015 2:52:24 GMT
Not having a good year thus far. Definitely isn't playing like a player who deserves an 86 rating. Not even averaging a double double. 8.2/9.8/3.8/1.6/0.8 PTS/RBS/AST/BLK/STL on 44.8% shooting and a career low 61.3% from the line. His defense is still good and his passing is above average, but those increases we made to his offensive game need to be taken back now, as he isn't the same player as he was last season. And this is exactly why we have the RC, to have a free-flowing rating system, so that when one player falters, he his decreased and he can be increased just as easily.My suggested rating is an 81. That is not happening at the moment. And you would know how? Can you see what we are doing as the RC? Can you see the thread where we actually do the ratings, and talk over what needs to be increased and decreased? If not, then don't comment on what we are or aren't doing. |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 10, 2015 2:58:30 GMT
That is not happening at the moment. And you would know how? Can you see what we are doing as the RC? Can you see the thread where we actually do the ratings, and talk over what needs to be increased and decreased? If not, then don't comment on what we are or aren't doing. I do not mean to say that you are not working on it what I mean is that the rating system is still not a free flowing system where ratings are change immediately. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 10, 2015 2:59:35 GMT
Not having a good year thus far. Definitely isn't playing like a player who deserves an 86 rating. Not even averaging a double double. 8.2/9.8/3.8/1.6/0.8 PTS/RBS/AST/BLK/STL on 44.8% shooting and a career low 61.3% from the line. His defense is still good and his passing is above average, but those increases we made to his offensive game need to be taken back now, as he isn't the same player as he was last season. And this is exactly why we have the RC, to have a free-flowing rating system, so that when one player falters, he his decreased and he can be increased just as easily.My suggested rating is an 81. That is not happening at the moment. Pinoy, I can tell tell you a couple things. #1 - You really don't know how much work we're doing behind the scenes. Whether it's a lot or a little, you simply don't know. So don't talk as if you do, please. #2 - Pissing off the RC is probably not the proper way to go about making it happen. Thanks B-) |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 10, 2015 3:00:46 GMT
I do not mean to say that you are not working on it what I mean is that the rating system is still not a free flowing system where ratings are change immediately. It's never going to be immediate. Never. Unless someone wants to donate like 40k a year to me, then I'll sit on here for hours a day and just process rating changes. Otherwise, be happy that it's actually a far better process than it was in the past. With 3-5 of us working on it now, things are better. |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 10, 2015 3:04:17 GMT
That is not happening at the moment. Pinoy, I can tell tell you a couple things. #1 - You really don't know how much work we're doing behind the scenes. Whether it's a lot or a little, you simply don't know. So don't talk as if you do, please. #2 - Pissing off the RC is probably not the proper way to go about making it happen. Thanks B-) I don't intend to piss anybody, But it seems I'm good at it without even noticing it. Sorry for that Charles. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 10, 2015 3:04:51 GMT
I do not mean to say that you are not working on it what I mean is that the rating system is still not a free flowing system where ratings are change immediately. And I don't shit gold. It won't ever be changed immediately because people need ample time to vote on the threads, and we can't make a new rating based off of just 20 games. How it works now is about as quickly as it is going to work, unless we decide to put a time limit on how long the threads are open, which is something we are discussing at this moment. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 10, 2015 3:32:36 GMT
I will go with an 84. I still think Noah is one of the best centers in the game. Minimal decrease should be due to a bad year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 10, 2015 3:33:21 GMT
We really can always pop him back up next year or even late this year if he turns it around.
81 feels too low for me though.
83
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jan 10, 2015 4:06:37 GMT
I don't think he ever deserved an 86. He just doesn't fill up the box score enough. He's a great defender and a good rebounder. But his shot is ugly as balls. The ball actually spins sideways when he shoots it.
82 from me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jan 10, 2015 4:12:32 GMT
Also, why are you guys going after Pinoy so much? On a scale of how quickly things move, I'd put rating changes pretty damn low on the list. Something like
Rocket
Airplane
Usain Bolt
.
.
.
Turtle
Rating changes
Snail
Glacier
Yes, there are legitimate reasons for why it moves at the pace it does, but lets not act like it isn't slow as shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jan 10, 2015 4:19:49 GMT
I wouldn't change him yet
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 10, 2015 6:10:13 GMT
Pinoy, I can tell tell you a couple things. #1 - You really don't know how much work we're doing behind the scenes. Whether it's a lot or a little, you simply don't know. So don't talk as if you do, please. #2 - Pissing off the RC is probably not the proper way to go about making it happen. Thanks B-) I don't intend to piss anybody, But it seems I'm good at it without even noticing it. Sorry for that Charles. Its ok Pinoy. I am sorry too |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 10:48:17 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2015 14:13:29 GMT
Don't worry about it Pinoy, fuck Charles...he's just Barkley!  I think maybe an 84 or an 85 for Noah. Keep in mind, him and Pau both are backed up by a REALLY good player in Taji Gibson. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jan 10, 2015 18:13:37 GMT
83
|
|
Larry Bird
 Indiana Pacers
Starter
Posts: 1,672
Mar 5, 2024 13:29:26 GMT
|
Post by Larry Bird on Jan 12, 2015 17:16:43 GMT
84
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jan 13, 2015 1:12:50 GMT
83
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jan 13, 2015 3:02:58 GMT
83
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 31, 2015 16:30:57 GMT
Do we still need more votes for this thread to close?
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Jan 31, 2015 21:13:03 GMT
83. His fg attempts here in D5 are insanely higher than it is in real life. Maybe just focus his stats highly on defense, rebounding, and passing coz that's the type of player he really is.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 10:48:17 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2015 21:14:33 GMT
83. His fg attempts here in D5 are insanely higher than it is in real life. Maybe just focus his stats highly on defense, rebounding, and passing coz that's the type of player he really is. 82 |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jan 31, 2015 22:39:43 GMT
Do we still need more votes for this thread to close? I don't think Noah will be in the next round of rating changes, so there is still time to vote. There's no set time limit on how long a SW thread is open or the amount of votes we need. We have been trying to get 8-10 votes per player, and if you see me or Walt, or Alex ask for more votes it is because we are in the midst of processing the rating change. If one of us comes in and announces the thread is closed, that means we have processed the rating change and would like all new arguments to be made in a new thread to avoid confusion. |
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Feb 1, 2015 11:24:52 GMT
84 ^^
|
|
Cleveland Cavaliers
Minnesota Timberwolves
Denver Nuggets
New Orleans Pelicans
I think maybe an 84 or an 85 for Noah. Keep in mind, him and Pau both are backed up by a REALLY good player in Taji Gibson. 
Brooklyn Nets
Philadelphia 76ers
Washington Wizards
