Deleted
Posts: 0
May 4, 2024 17:47:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2014 16:48:08 GMT
As long as I am on the Rating Committee, I am going to be attacked as in the posts below. How did Vlade get on the trade committee with this kind of obvious bias. Thats bullshit, 83 is fine for a guy who shoots 3s and does a little post work. And only averaging 16 points. There weren't that many mouths to feed their best player was out the majority of the season. Joe Johnson has always been a high usage scorer who does nothing else great. He's not the black hole that Rudy Gay is but he's not that amazing either. Therefore, I am going to resign to preserve the integrity of the process. I appreciate the opportunity but think I can make more of a difference off the committee than on it.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 22, 2014 19:40:00 GMT
Vlade that kinda thing happens on a daily basis if you're on a committee. You gotta train yourself to not give a shit! We chose you because you're good at the job, so please stick it out for us
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 4, 2024 17:47:19 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 22, 2014 20:13:31 GMT
Vlade that kinda thing happens on a daily basis if you're on a committee. You gotta train yourself to not give a shit! We chose you because you're good at the job, so please stick it out for us No thanks. I am not mad about it or anything but people are going to throw the "Chris Bosh jab" at me every single time I try to do something with the ratings. Therefore, I think it hurts the integrity of the process. Honestly, part of the reason I am doing this is I think the SWC/RC is a great idea and want to see it work because it will take A LOT of work away from you, Ian, as the simmer. The persona of Vlade Divac gives off an impression of radical and cutthroat, which is accurate but I would use a position of power to gain an advantage. Factor in the whole JR "cheating thing" and I think it's probably for the best. Besides, the RC keeps me in a box as far as my arguments and I don't like that at all!
|
|