|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 17, 2014 20:37:25 GMT
Current Rating: 73
Suggested Rating: 75
I'm not a huge fan of his or anything, but he does enough that he's definitely better than a 73. Just not sure how much better. 73 is just a little too low IMO.
9.7 points, 3.9 rebounds, 1.1 ast/1.2 TO, 0.9 steals, 0.2 blocks. Shoots 44.2/38.1/76.1
His boost should probably come in his 3pt shot and FT%, as he's a career 68% guy from the line and I just kinda doubt we have his 3 up at a decent rate. Compare to Glen Davis and it's basically a huge advantage to Marcus for his 3pt shot, but less boards (although less minutes compared to Glen's time in Orlando).
I'm almost at a 75.5 but I'll leave it at a 75 haha.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 2:29:32 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2014 20:41:01 GMT
76
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 18, 2014 1:05:12 GMT
76
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 18, 2014 3:29:00 GMT
73, come on dude. He's not even as good as Tristan Thompson.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 18, 2014 3:32:18 GMT
73, come on dude. He's not even as good as Tristan Thompson. Personally haven't gotten to Tristan yet, maybe he also deserves an increase? |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 18, 2014 3:37:07 GMT
73, come on dude. He's not even as good as Tristan Thompson. Personally haven't gotten to Tristan yet, maybe he also deserves an increase? No he doesn't trust me. |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 27, 2014 23:33:53 GMT
77
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Dec 27, 2014 13:55:08 GMT
Come on guys, this guy should not be 73 right now..
Im upping my vote to 78..
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Dec 27, 2014 13:59:31 GMT
74
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 27, 2014 18:53:27 GMT
75
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Dec 27, 2014 23:10:32 GMT
74
9 and 4 isn't much to write home about
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Dec 28, 2014 1:02:30 GMT
how come that he will be just a 75 if some of the rookies are rated much higher than him  |
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Dec 28, 2014 1:54:32 GMT
how come that he will be just a 75 if some of the rookies are rated much higher than him ^ this is why rookie ratings don't make any sense |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 28, 2014 4:37:08 GMT
Rookies come into the league with zero NBA experience (quite obviously).
We rate them based on a combination of factors, including their potential, their floor, their ceiling, their college stats, their athletic stats, etc.
That's basically how NBA Live always did it, and in an effort to keep things consistent, that's how we're doing them at this point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Dec 28, 2014 9:16:20 GMT
Rookies come into the league with zero NBA experience (quite obviously). We rate them based on a combination of factors, including their potential, their floor, their ceiling, their college stats, their athletic stats, etc. That's basically how NBA Live always did it, and in an effort to keep things consistent, that's how we're doing them at this point. does that mean that we will need to create each thread for each one just to decrease them? I think 2 months should be enough to already say that almost, maybe except McDaniels, all of them are overrated. Can we at least decrease them by at least 1 right now. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 28, 2014 21:07:00 GMT
Yes, any player rating change needs a thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 28, 2014 21:32:51 GMT
Yes, any player rating change needs a thread. "A thread" but not necessarily "a thread each", we have lots of combined threads where a bunch of players get adjusted all at once. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 29, 2014 0:22:24 GMT
As the head of the Ratings Committee though, I must say it is the most clear when there is an individual thread. It also encourages more discussion which leads to more accurate rating changes. Even if I or another member of the RC doesn't agree with the rating, we get a better feel for what the league thinks lowered when there is an individual thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Dec 29, 2014 0:26:04 GMT
As the head of the Ratings Committee though, I must say it is the most clear when there is an individual thread. It also encourages more discussion which leads to more accurate rating changes. Even if I or another member of the RC doesn't agree with the rating, we get a better feel for what the league thinks lowered when there is an individual thread. but it is okay to make a thread for a lot of players right? |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 29, 2014 0:27:16 GMT
I'll be honest Pinoy, I get paid exactly nothing to do what I do on Ratings Committee, same with everyone else here, obviously, and the huge post with multiple players makes my "job" 100x harder than if you create individual threads.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 24, 2015 1:23:24 GMT
Come on guys.
This guy need more votes.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 2:29:32 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 24, 2015 2:25:35 GMT
75 love him. hes been great yhis year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Jan 24, 2015 3:16:06 GMT
76 ^^
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 24, 2015 21:00:00 GMT
74
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 2:29:32 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2015 22:44:10 GMT
bamp for processing
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Feb 3, 2015 23:08:16 GMT
75
Now I'm not sure why his brother has a 79 rating..
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 4, 2015 0:06:44 GMT
|
|
Minnesota Timberwolves
New Orleans Pelicans
Cleveland Cavaliers
Brooklyn Nets
Denver Nuggets
Washington Wizards
Philadelphia 76ers
