Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 11:56:52 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2014 22:10:00 GMT
Since we have gone INSANE on the rating changes, let me put my Josh Smith argument into perspective:
Dwight Howard Rating: 90
Purposed Rating: 86 (if Josh Smith is an 83 or an 84.)
Comparison:
PPG: Howard 18.5, Smith 16.4
RPG: Howard 12.3, Smith 6.9
APG: Howard 1.8, Smith 3.3
BPG: Howard 1.8, Smith 1.5
SPG: Howard .9, Smith 1.4
FT % is virtually the same and while Howard beats him in FG%, we all know all Howard does is dunk. Therefore, you are going to punch Smith for trying to shoot outside?
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 2, 2014 23:20:45 GMT
I still think Howard is shooting FT% in game is too high.
|
|
Chris Mullin
Golden State Warriors
Starter
Posts: 1,303
Feb 19, 2024 21:58:28 GMT
|
Post by Chris Mullin on Apr 3, 2014 1:00:58 GMT
92
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 11:56:52 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2014 1:41:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 3, 2014 1:41:59 GMT
90 Edit: I mean 92 I want no change in current rating
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 3, 2014 1:49:36 GMT
PPG: Howard 18.5, Smith 16.4 Howard at 59% FG
RPG: Howard 12.3, Smith 6.9 Twice the Rebounds
APG: Howard 1.8, Smith 3.3 Not terrible for a center
BPG: Howard 1.8, Smith 1.5 Fine
SPG: Howard .9, Smith 1.4 .9 Stl for a center is pretty good actually
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Apr 3, 2014 1:51:01 GMT
No change.
90
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Apr 3, 2014 1:53:57 GMT
Where does that 90 come from? His current rating in the salary database is 92.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 3, 2014 2:31:56 GMT
I'd put him at a 91, but Alex is right he's at a 92 in the database.
|
|
Chris Mullin
Golden State Warriors
Starter
Posts: 1,303
Feb 19, 2024 21:58:28 GMT
|
Post by Chris Mullin on Apr 3, 2014 2:48:48 GMT
Really dont see any reason Howard should be decreased.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 11:56:52 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2014 3:01:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 4, 2014 15:11:39 GMT
Bump.
More ratings would be good I guess, though it looks like a 1 point drop at most when we average everything out. We've got an 86-88-91-91-92-92 so far.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Apr 4, 2014 18:29:43 GMT
I was referring to the original post listing him at 90.
If he is a 92 currently, then I would change my vote to a 91 (ever so slight decrease overall).
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 4, 2014 18:30:52 GMT
Thanks Mike. Will update that.
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on Apr 4, 2014 18:32:15 GMT
90 for me
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 11:56:52 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2014 4:37:56 GMT
I am going to change my vote to an 88.
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on Apr 5, 2014 20:38:43 GMT
Not entirely sure why of all people Dwight is being looked at when there's lots of others players to be fixed, but I guess I would give him a 90.
|
|