|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 21, 2014 2:18:27 GMT
I'm not going to even gather all the percentages, just know it's pretty much career lows in everything, and last season he was having career lows in everything too.
Current Rating: 83
Proposed Rating: 74
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 21, 2014 5:26:58 GMT
75 for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 6, 2014 13:05:25 GMT
I'm going to go as low as 72. Mostly because I feel like, when players careers "drop-off", we are too conservative. Generally once they've hit the wall of their lowering athleticism that's it, unless you're Tim Duncan or Derek Fisher.
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Mar 6, 2014 15:00:58 GMT
I agree with Ian. 72.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on Mar 6, 2014 15:49:50 GMT
72
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Mar 7, 2014 1:30:08 GMT
70
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Mar 12, 2014 2:24:58 GMT
I'm pretty OK with anything between a 75 and 70 honestly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Mar 12, 2014 2:42:12 GMT
74
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on Mar 12, 2014 2:51:55 GMT
73
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:39:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2014 0:48:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Apr 2, 2014 3:24:35 GMT
75
|
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Apr 2, 2014 3:47:55 GMT
74
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:39:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2014 16:07:49 GMT
Bumo. 72 is way too low. This guy needs to be at least a 75.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 2, 2014 16:35:27 GMT
Jason Terry is terrible now.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:39:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2014 16:50:37 GMT
Like I said before I don't think anyone on my team deserves below a 75. Jason Terrys not done. He was traded and didn't want to play for a young SAC team. So he's rehabbing. Next season he will join a team and average 10-15ppg. Just because he's not playing. .Ex bynum...doesn't mean he's terrible. ..
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 2, 2014 16:57:47 GMT
He wasn't traded when he was terrible for Boston.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:39:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2014 17:07:02 GMT
He wasn't terrible in boston. He didn't play well in Brooklyn. But he's role player. He played some great games in Boston just like in Dallas. He is getting older but one season does not make a player go from an 82 rating to a 72. Six months ago guys were here in the stock watch giving him 78 rating. Since then he was traded and didn't play for SAC. Does that mean he's bad and deserves an 72 rating. No!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 6, 2014 20:00:04 GMT
This is the one Bob McAdoo
|
|
Bob McAdoo
Former Pistons GM
Rookie
Posts: 168
Jan 1, 2015 19:27:55 GMT
|
Post by Bob McAdoo on Apr 6, 2014 20:13:12 GMT
Jason Terry's numbers have been in free fall for the last two years; PER for the last two years of 12.8 and 7.5 respectively. Even FT shooting s going.
Season Tm G GS MP FG% 3P% FT% TRB AST STL TOV PTS
2012-13 BOS 79 24 26.9 43% 37% 87% 2.0 2.5 0.8 1.3 10.1
2013-14 BRK 35 0 16.3 36% 38% 67% 1.1 1.6 0.4 0.8 4.5
Jason Terry is no longer a guy who should be putting up a line like this:
M FG FGA 3PM 3PA FTM FTA REB ASS STLS PTS
42 8-19 3-4 8-11 3 7 2 27
...not even against BOS
I am new to this rating change stuff but he`s now a way below average, old player and I think needs to be rated accordingly I think 75 is average, so well below that.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:39:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2014 20:41:24 GMT
75
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Apr 7, 2014 5:06:57 GMT
74
Stick a fork in him, he's done...
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 7, 2014 13:17:13 GMT
Changing mine to a 72.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:39:54 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2014 13:25:51 GMT
75 is fair for any player that is aging but is still in the NBA . These are the types of guys that come in and score 5 pts one night and maybe a few games later 20pts. Any player that's still playing and can do this every so often to help his team to a win still deserves a 75 rating. Players that are role players and 7th man back(previously) may not deserve a 75 but Terry, Jamison, Miller... such players still have game..just not every game.
75-77
So I'll give him a 76.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 7, 2014 14:18:54 GMT
75 is fair for any player that is aging but is still in the NBA . These are the types of guys that come in and score 5 pts one night and maybe a few games later 20pts. Any player that's still playing and can do this every so often to help his team to a win still deserves a 75 rating. Players that are role players and 7th man back(previously) may not deserve a 75 but Terry, Jamison, Miller... such players still have game..just not every game. 75-77 So I'll give him a 76. I could not disagree more. This isn't a case of a guy just isn't getting minutes because someone in front of him is better, this is a guy who got moved from his normal role of 25-30 minutes a game as one of the best 6th men ever. To getting himself benched because he is not good anymore. Could he beat me at basketball? Probably, but we aren't supposed to be saying whether he can play or not, we are measuring him against his peers at the NBA level and as it stands right now he is essentially one of the worst real life contracts in the NBA now because of how hard he has fallen off. If you don't believe me he started the season with Brooklyn and was given his expected minutes, he just sucked with them. Then he got hurt for a bit, came back and sucked again. He actually sucked so bad they had to trade him for players off of Sacramento. He is just worse than the other aging players in the NBA, Andre Miller can at least produce and play meaningful minutes. Antawn Jamison is a bad example because I'm pretty sure he hasn't played a meaningful minute in the past 2 seasons. |
|
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
Philadelphia 76ers
Miami Heat
New Orleans Pelicans
Toronto Raptors
LA Clippers
Chicago Bulls
