Magic Johnson
Former Lakers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 458
Feb 27, 2024 20:39:01 GMT
|
Post by Magic Johnson on Feb 13, 2014 17:29:14 GMT
In real life NBA we know teams have off-season contract extensions but I believe here there isn't such a period and it's just factored in with resginings.
I was wondering whether BOS would consider inseason extensions (ONLY if it's in final year of contract).
We have seen in real life NBA teams trade for certain players and either sign player to an extension
OR
pick up the ETO, PO, TO and then sign the player for an additional 3 years (max you can add for extensions inseason 3 years tops).
I know there are other factors to consider such as salary cap (cap space or none), bird rights, trade restrictions and those things BUT
I just wanted to bring up this topic to see what everyone here thinks about this.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 13, 2014 17:42:46 GMT
Well I guess that depends, is your player a 27 year old player who's an 84 playing on a lottery team for the past 3 season maybe stuff like this has to go to the player's agent or something and play to the realism aspect so we don't get players just getting signed to super small contracts. I'm not against it.
|
|
Glenn Robinson
Milwaukee Bucks
Starter
Posts: 1,226
Mar 2, 2024 5:20:47 GMT
|
Post by Glenn Robinson on Feb 13, 2014 19:38:11 GMT
I think that would dilute free agency which is one of the most active times in the off-season for Dynasty5ive.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 14, 2014 4:54:18 GMT
Thinking about it Glenn Robinson's way that kind of makes sense for making the game more fun.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 14, 2014 8:36:51 GMT
I think this technically is something worth considering, there's a lot of reasons why it would be good, but there's a lot of reasons it would be a bad thing. The good thing is that participation and activity does go down during the middle of the season, because you can only trade and sign players. Signing players throughout the season would boost activity. Activity during the off season, according to my Google Analytics, is like 10x higher than during the season because not only can you trade and sign, but you can sign the *best* players and draft rookies etc.etc. If a GM is absent during the off season it hurts his team 10x more than during the season, and that's happened quite often. I'll have a think when I actually get a moment spare to think about it
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 10, 2014 4:46:45 GMT
I really like the idea of in-season contract extension talks but, of course, there would have to be limiting factors.
What if they were somethings like: A GM cannot extend a player longer than 3 years onto his current deal. A GM cannot extend more than one player per season. A GM cannot negotiate with anymore than 1 player at a time. Negotiations can only last 14 IRL days.
That would all be for in-season extensions. That way us GM's aren't maxing every player they have already on their team and the agents aren't bogged down with a bunch of contract proposals. Plus some players in real life don't like to negotiate during the season sometimes. Besides having a player on your team to help win games, there's no other advantage to having a player and, in real life, there's tons of other advantages from jersey sales to PR to being able to negotiate with your best player or their agent before another team can.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Mar 10, 2014 13:19:22 GMT
I think we would have to put in something like you can only re-sign a player mid season if you're going to own his bird rights that offseason anyway. It rewards you for keeping a guy for 3 years by not having to go through the stress of free agency.
I don't really like the idea of trading for a guy who is expiring and then being able to re-sign him.
|
|