|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 27, 2014 3:44:22 GMT
Such a weird situation, if he somehow were to come back and be productive again I think we should be quick to bump him up, BUT I am not holding my breath on him.
78 works for me as well right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 6, 2014 20:43:57 GMT
I'm going to take Bynum down to a conservative 80 for now, just because it's absurd that he's 86. He's going to be coming off the bench for Indiana, he's not as good as Roy Hibbert and he's only rated an 81.
We should wait and see how Bynum performs in Indy before really judging him. By the sounds of things, the managerial staff in Cleveland are a bit of a joke and that's bound to have had an impact regardless of the shit Bynum's putting himself through.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:47:57 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2014 22:47:04 GMT
Bynum right now is whatever Greg Oden is. They should both be about the same. At least Oden is back and playing...
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:47:57 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2014 22:50:49 GMT
He actually is a little better then Oden so say 75 for now. Maybe 72.5...lol
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:47:57 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2014 22:59:17 GMT
I think he's proven enough that he will never be a starter for any team more than a few games per season. He's def a backup now. But he's better than Oden at this point. 75 works for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Apr 2, 2014 3:11:21 GMT
74
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Apr 2, 2014 3:12:52 GMT
78
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Apr 2, 2014 6:13:31 GMT
79
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on Apr 2, 2014 7:27:49 GMT
I'll say 80 since he still produces if the minutes are there
here's his stats when he played atleast 24 minutes this year:
20/10/3/5 blk
20/13/2/3 blk
18/6
3/8/2/1 blk
13/9/2/2 stl
8/7/1/3 blk
19/7/2/1 stl
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Apr 2, 2014 8:20:30 GMT
I think he is between a 75 and an 80. He still shows flashes of his old self. I just think the desire for him isn't there anymore. There's no desire to play when it will cause him pain. And a lot of big men have made there name's in this game with desire alone. I mean, look at me, I'm a 6'6 power forward. Sure I never won a ring, but it wasn't because I didn't grab every rebound possible.
Anyways, I think he is a 77. I wish there were a way to increase a players efficiency, reserved for mainly role players that play exceptionally well with limited minutes. There's a lot of guys in the NBA who play well on limited minutes, either because they can't handle 40+ or because their team doesn't ask them to. I feel like D-Wade will be falling into this category in another year or so.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:47:57 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2014 8:33:29 GMT
I think he is between a 75 and an 80. He still shows flashes of his old self. I just think the desire for him isn't there anymore. There's no desire to play when it will cause him pain. And a lot of big men have made there name's in this game with desire alone. I mean, look at me, I'm a 6'6 power forward. Sure I never won a ring, but it wasn't because I didn't grab every rebound possible. Anyways, I think he is a 77. I wish there were a way to increase a players efficiency, reserved for mainly role players that play exceptionally well with limited minutes. There's a lot of guys in the NBA who play well on limited minutes, either because they can't handle 40+ or because their team doesn't ask them to. I feel like D-Wade will be falling into this category in another year or so. I take back my previous posts and I suggest am 80. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:47:57 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2014 11:39:40 GMT
I agree with and 80 for Bynum, but on a side note I think the answer to JR's dilemma might be to raise Oden to 80 as well!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 2, 2014 12:01:51 GMT
78
|
|
Magic Johnson
Former Lakers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 458
Feb 27, 2024 20:39:01 GMT
|
Post by Magic Johnson on Apr 2, 2014 14:20:37 GMT
77
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 2, 2014 14:45:04 GMT
Torn on this...I'd like to wait a little longer. If he was still rated as a great player in the 86 range like he was earlier this season I'd drop him like a rock to the 78-80 range...but since he's already an 80 I'd keep him there for now.
80
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 2, 2014 14:51:40 GMT
I feel that as a Cavs fan I have to comment on this as I got a bit more time to watch him this season than most probably. The effort Bynum made to get back on the court was admirable however his touch was gone, he had no lift left. When he realized it wasn't easy anymore he just moped. If I remember correctly from the Cavs the blog article the Cavs were something like 10points worse both on offense and defense while Bynum was in. Without Bynum the Cavs record is like 19/21 that is with Spencer Hawes who is rated lower than some you are proposing rating Bynum.
I say that Bynum is a 71, he destroyed this team. If we had started the season without him and our team had the time to gel we would be approaching 39-42 win season. I find it no coincidence that Indiana has struggled even more now that Bynum has been signed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Apr 2, 2014 19:54:54 GMT
79
|
|
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
Chicago Bulls
LA Clippers
Philadelphia 76ers
New Orleans Pelicans
Toronto Raptors
