Dan Gilbert
Former Cavaliers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 457
Apr 4, 2024 17:22:13 GMT
|
Post by Dan Gilbert on Aug 4, 2013 0:20:15 GMT
 77 Randy Foye $4,000,000 $4,000,000
74 Larry Sanders $3,053,368 $4,268,609
66 Cole Aldrich $3,245,152(TO) $4,442,613
73 John Jenkins $600,000 $700,000(TO)
2014 Brooklyn Nets 2nd round pick
2014 Cleveland Cavaliers 2nd round pick
2014 Sacramento Kings 2nd round pick
Total Salary - $7,653,368 (Not including Aldrich TO)
Total Salary - $10,898,520 (Inluding Aldrich TO) 78 Nate Robinson $2,900,000 $3,300,000(PO)
78 Vince Carter $3,270,000
74 Vladimir Radmanovic $490,198
72 Ekpe Udoh $4,469,548 $5,962,377
Total Salary - $11,129,746I accept. Adding some punch off the bench with Robinson and Carter. |
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Aug 4, 2013 0:48:01 GMT
I reject. Larry Sanders is worth more alone than what Cleveland gets back from the Pacers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Aug 4, 2013 0:57:55 GMT
I reject. Larry Sanders is worth more alone than what Cleveland gets back from the Pacers. YOU FORGOT THE PICTURE!  Haha, I'll have to remember for next time. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Aug 4, 2013 3:58:03 GMT
I'm with Alex. IMO, at the very least, Sanders can just fetch more in a trade than this, so he should just wait another season or just until he gets a better offer. It's about Value. It's not always just about "can they afford to do this". The value is just too skewed IMO.
Reject.
|
|
Dan Gilbert
Former Cavaliers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 457
Apr 4, 2024 17:22:13 GMT
|
Post by Dan Gilbert on Aug 4, 2013 4:02:27 GMT
Lmao. Oh well
|
|
Larry Bird
 Indiana Pacers
Starter
Posts: 1,672
Mar 5, 2024 13:29:26 GMT
|
Post by Larry Bird on Aug 4, 2013 4:43:59 GMT
This is a good trade.
I get Sanders, but lose Robinson and Carter who'll be good scorers for him.
I accept.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Aug 4, 2013 5:44:31 GMT
Look guys, to be honest, just a personal thing I've decided to stand up on. I went back and looked at some trades the last couple days, and one really stuck out. The Paul George trade, I was sooo close to rejecting, but decided to let people run their team. Well, unfortunately, that's not [i[really[/i] what I'm here for. I, and the other CM's, are in this position b/c we are trusted in our combined values to keep trades in check, realistic, and to keep the league pointed in the right direction under Ian's dedication and leadership.
That sounds kinda deep, maybe I'm just sleep deprived, but it's how I feel.
Sanders should not be traded for this, and I actually like Nate a pretty good amount, but this just isn't enough for Larry Sanders.
|
|
Larry Bird
Indiana Pacers
Starter
Posts: 1,672
Mar 5, 2024 13:29:26 GMT
|
Post by Larry Bird on Aug 4, 2013 12:51:13 GMT
It seems like you guys think Im getting the better end of this.
If it would help even thinks out, I will include Sacramento's 1st in '15.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Aug 4, 2013 16:02:34 GMT
That pick will likely not be good (Westbrook/Lillard/Granger and can still sign a max guy) but it would certainly help. I'm not saying I'd accept but I would think about it and re-assess again. My first thought, as stated already, is that is going to be a pick in the 20's in a draft that will not be great, so it could just be another role player. While Sanders is just much much better still.
I think I'd still reject personally.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dominique Wilkins on Aug 4, 2013 16:38:22 GMT
Yeah, I agree w Alex and Walt on this. Sanders is a very nice player and could be very valueable.
I reject also.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Aug 7, 2013 21:00:51 GMT
Sorry guys. Back to the drawing board.
|
|
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
