|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 21, 2013 19:55:47 GMT
I know I have a backlog to get on top of in this section, but DWade is 96 and he's not really a franchise cornerstone any more.
I'll go for a 91 for now.
|
|
Kevin Ware
Former Cavaliers GM
Rookie
Posts: 154
Feb 18, 2019 20:00:12 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Ware on Jun 21, 2013 20:09:05 GMT
He definitely needs a downgrade at this point in his career... Ginobili is an 86 and could also use a downgrade.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:46:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 21, 2013 20:52:33 GMT
I know I have a backlog to get on top of in this section, but DWade is 96 and he's not really a franchise cornerstone any more. I'll go for a 91 for now. I would give him 88-89 |
|
Glenn Robinson
 Milwaukee Bucks
Starter
Posts: 1,226
Nov 22, 2024 4:29:32 GMT
|
Post by Glenn Robinson on Jun 21, 2013 21:25:10 GMT
89
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 21, 2013 21:34:43 GMT
I'll go 92. If he was still on his own team I think he'd be playing almost at his best, but he's starting to look run down.
|
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Jun 21, 2013 23:37:56 GMT
89-90
|
|
Magic Johnson
Former Lakers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 458
Feb 27, 2024 20:39:01 GMT
|
Post by Magic Johnson on Jun 21, 2013 23:38:02 GMT
he should be rated a 27 NOW.
JK
I still think he is franchise caliber and should be respected as such he showed he can still take over and dominate a game, health has always been a question so maybe lower his injury/fatigue ratings instead.
instead of 96
make him 92.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jun 22, 2013 0:16:21 GMT
We had a Bosh discussion at some point too, think we decided he looks worse b/c he's asked to do different things than what made him great and got him his rating before.
I think Wade is similar. I agree he's lost something though.
I'll go 92 for now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on Jun 22, 2013 23:57:31 GMT
89-90 for me, not what he used to be but still an amazing player. Just has lost a step.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blake Bowman on Jun 23, 2013 2:37:07 GMT
Since injuries will be implemented next season his durability rating shouldn't be high, cause he gets hurt a lot. I'd go 92.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jun 23, 2013 3:09:26 GMT
This is stupid. We're decreasing Manu and Wade because they made the finals?? Not even gonna bother to write up a bunch of stuff. Look up his regular season stats. www.nba.com/playerfile/dwyane_wade/Dude shot 52% and scored 21 a game on the best team in the league. And he's a great defender. He's a 96. |
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jun 23, 2013 18:48:07 GMT
Since injuries will be implemented next season his durability rating shouldn't be high, cause he gets hurt a lot. I'd go 92. As far as I know injuries aren't being implemented next season. Ian changed that a week or two ago. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 23, 2013 18:53:20 GMT
This is stupid. We're decreasing Manu and Wade because they made the finals?? Not even gonna bother to write up a bunch of stuff. Look up his regular season stats. www.nba.com/playerfile/dwyane_wade/Dude shot 52% and scored 21 a game on the best team in the league. And he's a great defender. He's a 96. Josh has a point here, maybe we should hold off. Let's not forget he's the second biggest reason the Heat won the championship for the second year running. Since injuries will be implemented next season his durability rating shouldn't be high, cause he gets hurt a lot. I'd go 92. As far as I know injuries aren't being implemented next season. Ian changed that a week or two ago. Confirmed. |
|
|
|
Post by Blake Bowman on Jun 23, 2013 20:18:53 GMT
This is stupid. We're decreasing Manu and Wade because they made the finals?? Not even gonna bother to write up a bunch of stuff. Look up his regular season stats. www.nba.com/playerfile/dwyane_wade/Dude shot 52% and scored 21 a game on the best team in the league. And he's a great defender. He's a 96. Josh has a point here, maybe we should hold off. Let's not forget he's the second biggest reason the Heat won the championship for the second year running. But is he the second best player in the NBA? |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jun 24, 2013 0:18:26 GMT
I think the people saying 88, 89 are being waaaaay too influenced by a small sample, BUT I do not think Wade should be 96 anymore. As I already said, 92 sounds ok. Even 93 I'd be fine with, but he's not 95+ anymore to me.
|
|
Otis Smith
Former Rockets GM
Sophomore
Posts: 280
Dec 24, 2013 6:32:46 GMT
|
Post by Otis Smith on Jul 11, 2013 19:33:53 GMT
This is stupid. We're decreasing Manu and Wade because they made the finals?? Not even gonna bother to write up a bunch of stuff. Look up his regular season stats. www.nba.com/playerfile/dwyane_wade/Dude shot 52% and scored 21 a game on the best team in the league. And he's a great defender. He's a 96. in what world is wade still a 96. His declining athleticism coupled with his lack of shooting is declining him faster than anyone. Even his defence has suffered. He is in the high 80s at this point. 88-89. |
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on Jul 14, 2013 8:23:14 GMT
i think he was slow during playoffs because of injuries, i think we should wait until he recoverd completely...
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:46:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2013 19:47:23 GMT
I want him lowered to an 88 with his IQ taken down by half. Anyone who cannot see that George Zimmerman did not commit 2nd-degree murder is not that smart!  |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Sept 15, 2013 16:28:14 GMT
88.5
88.5
89
89
89.5
89.5
91
92
92
92
96
Wade goes to 90.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:46:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2014 0:24:33 GMT
This needs to be revisited in light of the Chris Bosh debacle; if Bosh can be an 88 because of his FG percentage (51.9%) then how can we justify lowering Wade at all when he shoots an even better FG percentage (54.6%) and may break some records for single season field goal percentage by a 2 guard.
Personally, I think Wade should be reinstated as a 93.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 8, 2014 2:30:27 GMT
I don't think this is a damnation of his talent, more along the lines of his athleticism.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:46:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2014 3:33:08 GMT
I don't think this is a damnation of his talent, more along the lines of his athleticism. I thought your whole argument about Bosh revolved around his shooting percentage? If Wade's is better than Bosh's, shouldn't he be rated like 5 points higher than him? |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 8, 2014 3:51:48 GMT
Fuck it, 100, lets make everyone a 100.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Apr 8, 2014 12:50:18 GMT
91
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 8:46:31 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 8, 2014 13:00:18 GMT
This is why I repeat myself, again: This needs to be revisited in light of the Chris Bosh debacle; if Bosh can be an 88 because of his FG percentage (51.9%) then how can we justify lowering Wade at all when he shoots an even better FG percentage (54.6%) and may break some records for single season field goal percentage by a 2 guard. Can you explain this to me? I really want to understand. |
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on Apr 8, 2014 13:06:34 GMT
When comparing Bosh and Wade this has really brought new light to the conversation. I'm pretty astounded at the fact that Wade is shooting 54.6% while playing power forward. Not only is it a new position that he's tackling but he's extremely undersized.
99 for me folks
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Apr 8, 2014 14:15:53 GMT
When comparing Bosh and Wade this has really brought new light to the conversation. I'm pretty astounded at the fact that Wade is shooting 54.6% while playing power forward. Not only is it a new position that he's tackling but he's extremely undersized. 99 for me folks See my response in the Blake Griffin thread. |
|
Boston Celtics
Denver Nuggets
Philadelphia 76ers
Minnesota Timberwolves
Brooklyn Nets
Miami Heat
LA Clippers
