|
Post by Jared Montini on Jan 24, 2023 23:20:44 GMT
Current 77 Suggested 71
Matisse Thybulle - 2.4 ppg, 1.2 rpg, 0.5 apg, 0.8 spg, 0.3 bpg. .417 / .302 / .500 splits
|
|
|
Post by Brad Stevens on Jan 25, 2023 1:03:13 GMT
70.8
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 25, 2023 4:07:32 GMT
71
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Jan 25, 2023 9:05:31 GMT
70
|
|
|
Post by Arvydas Sabonis on Jan 25, 2023 11:48:55 GMT
71
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jan 25, 2023 14:40:55 GMT
70
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Feb 21, 2023 13:45:42 GMT
Bump. We completely forgot about this one
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 21, 2023 13:54:40 GMT
Bump. We completely forgot about this one I agree. By the way, in Portland He is currently averaging 10.1 PTS | 4.4 REBS | 1.9 ASTS | 3.2 STLS | 1.9 BLKS | 44% 3FG | 2.5 3PM PER 36 MINUTES. And except his rookie season, he is still have a positive net rating in every season.
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Feb 21, 2023 14:05:52 GMT
Bump. We completely forgot about this one I agree. By the way, in Portland He is currently averaging 10.1 PTS | 4.4 REBS | 1.9 ASTS | 3.2 STLS | 1.9 BLKS | 44% 3FG | 2.5 3PM PER 36 MINUTES. And except his rookie season, he is still have a positive net rating in every season. A two game sample is worthless for a trend — by that logic, I should’ve SW’d Luka to a 107 when he had a 5 game stretch where he averaged 50/10/10 lol
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Feb 21, 2023 14:50:17 GMT
Using a PER36 from a 2 game sample is peak D5
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 21, 2023 14:54:47 GMT
Is stating facts now a misinformation?
Where is the lie?
I tell you where it is.
The lie is the belief of people who thinks that players who are still young will loss 6 points of skill value just because they are not being given the same amount of playing time.
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 21, 2023 15:27:43 GMT
72
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Feb 21, 2023 16:45:05 GMT
Ah yes, the Richaun Holmes debate. Is my player only bad because he gets no playing time? Or does he only get no playing time because he is bad?
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Feb 22, 2023 2:02:19 GMT
72
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 22, 2023 19:21:58 GMT
Ah yes, the Richaun Holmes debate. Is my player only bad because he gets no playing time? Or does he only get no playing time because he is bad? Richaun is on my team, so I don't even know why this became a thing. I voted for a hefty decrease. But, yea. Our ratings are supposed to represent a player's impact on the NBA into a numerical "OVR" rating. Holmes impact is down, so is his rating as far as I'm concerned. Hana, you didn't lie but it's just useless info at this point. No one is voting on a 2-game sample, period. Trying to mask it's effectiveness by using PER36 just furthers your trolling.
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Mar 2, 2023 15:53:16 GMT
THREAD CLOSED.
New Rating = 71 (70.9)
|
|