|
Post by Tom Izzo on Apr 25, 2022 15:54:07 GMT
8.5 PPG 5.5 RPG 1.3 APG
42% FG 37% 3P
We just lowered Danny Green for having pretty bad stats too.
Current: 79 Proposed: 77
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 25, 2022 15:55:03 GMT
78, he's an excellent defensive player still. Shut down Kat in the play in game
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Apr 25, 2022 15:56:01 GMT
78.25
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 25, 2022 15:56:05 GMT
79 no change
10.4 ppg and 5.1 rpg on .500 / .450 / .848 splits since getting to LAC .677 TS%
Silly thread
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Apr 25, 2022 15:59:05 GMT
Post all Star
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Apr 25, 2022 15:59:24 GMT
Can still be rated lower with higher defensive stats.
76
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Apr 25, 2022 15:59:46 GMT
78, he's an excellent defensive player still. Shut down Kat in the play in game Worked out well for them
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 25, 2022 16:00:42 GMT
78, he's an excellent defensive player still. Shut down Kat in the play in game Worked out well for them What does ant going off have anything to do with roco, when he shut down the player he was guarding?
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 25, 2022 16:01:12 GMT
This is case in point why I'm the only person posting decreases. Tom and Chauncey immediately retaliate with huge lowball ratings. Way to be toxic, guys.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Apr 25, 2022 16:02:22 GMT
Nah this is fair game. It’s a consensus rating if the league. All SWs are fair game imo
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Apr 25, 2022 16:04:18 GMT
I don't think 76 is a low-ball for a guy who put up 8/5/1 this season. You can make him a good defensive player and still lower his offensive stats. Can you find me another 79 player with 8/5/1 stats?
I've posted a whole bunch of deceases this year.
And yes it is retaliatory and also deserved. Both things can be true.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 25, 2022 16:04:24 GMT
Nah this is fair game. It’s a consensus rating if the league. All SWs are fair game imo Sure but we need everyone to rate fairly. If Tom and Chauncy are going to team up to intentionally lowball a player, then it calls into question the entire integrity of the stockwatch section. I don't care if my entire team gets posted, but if certain GMs are intentionally trying to lowball certain teams/players, then its an issue that we will have to address.
|
|
Larry Bird
Indiana Pacers
Starter
Posts: 1,672
Mar 5, 2024 13:29:26 GMT
|
Post by Larry Bird on Apr 25, 2022 16:06:16 GMT
79
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Apr 25, 2022 16:15:16 GMT
Nah this is fair game. It’s a consensus rating if the league. All SWs are fair game imo Sure but we need everyone to rate fairly. If Tom and Chauncy are going to team up to intentionally lowball a player, then it calls into question the entire integrity of the stockwatch section. I don't care if my entire team gets posted, but if certain GMs are intentionally trying to lowball certain teams/players, then its an issue that we will have to address. Team up to intentionally low ball? Do you have proof of this? I promise you that those of you in the discord talk more often than me and him talk lol
|
|
|
Post by Brad Stevens on Apr 25, 2022 16:15:47 GMT
78.6
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Apr 25, 2022 16:19:08 GMT
It's weird, Covington has been on the decline but he clearly turned a page for us, I've been complimenting him non stop since he joined us. I'm going to vote a 78, just a low decrease just to not use ONLY the clippers sample size
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Apr 25, 2022 16:19:49 GMT
I changed to a 77 because he did play better in LA and that's more recent. His play in Portland was atrocious though
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
Apr 14, 2024 11:04:23 GMT
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Apr 25, 2022 16:22:13 GMT
78.75
|
|
|
Post by Arvydas Sabonis on Apr 25, 2022 16:28:21 GMT
77
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Apr 25, 2022 16:53:05 GMT
Nah this is fair game. It’s a consensus rating if the league. All SWs are fair game imo Sure but we need everyone to rate fairly. If Tom and Chauncy are going to team up to intentionally lowball a player, then it calls into question the entire integrity of the stockwatch section. I don't care if my entire team gets posted, but if certain GMs are intentionally trying to lowball certain teams/players, then its an issue that we will have to address. Nobody is teaming up Josh
|
|
|
Post by Steve Nash on Apr 25, 2022 16:56:12 GMT
Voted 78 for DFS and I think DFS is a better 3&D player.
77
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 26, 2022 14:44:17 GMT
bump - still open
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 30, 2022 0:20:47 GMT
77.75
(and, bump above closed threads)
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on May 17, 2022 14:32:02 GMT
THREAD CLOSED.
New Rating = 78 (77.93)
|
|