|
Post by Allen Iverson on Jan 8, 2021 4:35:02 GMT
Current Rating: 69 Suggested Rating: 82
2019-2020 stats: 9.3 ppg, 4.7 rpg, 0.8 apg, 0.5 spg, 0.5 bpg, 16.4 mins, 50.9% FG, 42.2% 3ptFG, 83.3% FT, 59.0% eFG%
2020-2021 stats: 19.5 ppg, 6.8 rpg, 1.8 apg, 1.0 spg, 1.5 bpg, 29.3 mins, 56.6% FG, 42.3% 3ptFG, 87.5% FT, 67.0% eFG%
This season (4 games), MPJ also has True Shooting% of 69.0%, TOV% of 3.4% (down from 10.6% last season), and a +6.8 Offensive Box Plus/Minus (+6.1 Box Plus/Minus). He has been taking half of his shots this season from 3pt line but still manages to increase his %s along with the increased minutes.
He still has a lot of work to do on the defensive end, but he's only 22, and has almost doubled his BLK% from 2.6% last season to 4.8% this season.
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Jan 8, 2021 5:33:47 GMT
81
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Jan 8, 2021 8:48:43 GMT
80
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jan 8, 2021 13:00:33 GMT
He's played 4 games this season... so I have no choice but to vote on last season's stats.
78
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jan 8, 2021 14:25:17 GMT
80
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jan 8, 2021 16:11:00 GMT
80
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jan 8, 2021 19:50:51 GMT
81
|
|
Tim Duncan
Former Jazz GM
Sophomore
Posts: 482
Mar 9, 2022 22:04:51 GMT
|
Post by Tim Duncan on Jan 9, 2021 11:37:25 GMT
79.5
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 9, 2021 16:21:32 GMT
Covid resistance should be a 10
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Jan 9, 2021 21:35:53 GMT
I'm really not a fan of these way-too-early stock watches. He's looking good and he's better for sure! But I like to give it more time. Maybe I'm too conservative.
78
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 9, 2021 22:11:01 GMT
I'd like to think of this more as a "didn't get bumped like he should have last season" type of thing. 4 games is fine, and he was getting better throughout last season, so he DEFINITELY deserves a bump from 69.
I think something like a 77-78 is safe for what he's shown. Doesn't make him TOO impactful on the game, if we're wrong, but gives a ton of credit for what he has proven so far.
Ill go 78.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 16, 2021 22:45:58 GMT
THREAD CLOSED
Raise to an 80
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 17, 2021 9:09:04 GMT
He's played 4 games this season... so I have no choice but to vote on last season's stats. 78 I would concur with Josh here. This is a crazy small sample size. I can't recall any player we've raised so prematurely. 77 but I think Walt's closed the thread unfortunately.
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
Apr 14, 2024 11:04:23 GMT
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Jan 17, 2021 23:16:10 GMT
79
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 18, 2021 4:00:14 GMT
Well, people stopped voting so I figured people were done voting. A week of silence is enough, generally, for me.
I'll add in these votes and if more come in soon...we can count those too. I'm not sure what "soon" is (lol) but yea. Get 'em in if you want!
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Jan 18, 2021 5:55:11 GMT
77
|
|
|
Post by Arvydas Sabonis on Jan 18, 2021 7:58:05 GMT
79
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 19, 2021 1:32:54 GMT
80
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Jan 19, 2021 17:21:24 GMT
78
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 19, 2021 19:49:37 GMT
77 - this thread is so premature lmao FOUR GAMES !!
|
|