Amare Stoudemire
 Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416 
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Feb 23, 2020 17:46:52 GMT
Current Rating: 88
Suggested Rating: 78
I know he's injured, but he's only played 30 games the last 2 years, with 2 major injuries.
I'm not going to throw stats up bc I simply can't, but imo he will never be the same player again imo
If he comes back and plays like his old self we can always bump him back up
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 23, 2020 18:04:19 GMT
This is one of the toughest stock watches I can remember.
Boogie looked pretty solid when he played a little bit last year. But that was also a super small sample size.
I'm gonna abstain since I really have no clue how to vote
|
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Feb 23, 2020 18:13:07 GMT
I vote no change as well. He's been hurt and it's likely he won't come back this way but at the same time, I'm apprehensive to down vote injured players
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Feb 23, 2020 18:13:27 GMT
I agree with Brian, altough I have my doubts about him an 88 when he comes back
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Feb 23, 2020 18:20:18 GMT
I'm cool with no change
Just thought I would throw it out their
It's gonna be very tough for him to be his old self, but I understand waiting till he comes back
|
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Feb 23, 2020 18:30:43 GMT
84 because we can change it whenever he’s back to form I just don’t think he will be an 88
|
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Feb 23, 2020 18:33:19 GMT
No change— everyone already has touched on the injury aspect and at this rate he won’t be back for anyone until the 2020-21 season
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Feb 23, 2020 18:41:57 GMT
There’s no point to stock watch a player that isn’t playing games IMO. His 88 is meaningless because he’s injured so if he comes back and sucks we can stock watch him then
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 24, 2020 4:20:55 GMT
Baaaaasically agree but I think he has to prove himself after this long with so little PT. I'll hedge my bets a little and go for a small decrease that still has him very good for now.
85
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Feb 24, 2020 14:25:03 GMT
84
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Feb 27, 2020 23:27:18 GMT
85
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 29, 2020 16:30:31 GMT
Is there much point re-rating him until he returns? Then we'll get an idea of how he's playing and can rate accordingly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Mar 17, 2020 2:24:52 GMT
I guess I already stated my opinion above. I'm okay either way though. This thread would only lower him to an 86 based on my calculations. He's at an 88 now so not a huge move...
Since there's some strong split here I guess we'll just leave it be for now.
THREAD CLOSED
|
|
New Orleans Pelicans
Houston Rockets
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
San Antonio Spurs
Charlotte Hornets
Minnesota Timberwolves
LA Clippers
Boston Celtics
