|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 24, 2020 3:26:36 GMT
Chris will sign with Toronto.
Year 1: 1,000,000
Year 2: 1,000,000
Year 3: 1,000,000
|
|
|
Post by Allen Iverson on Jan 24, 2020 4:23:23 GMT
*sighs*
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 24, 2020 4:24:28 GMT
Not a very friendly contract for the player...
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jan 24, 2020 6:48:09 GMT
Ian Noble You can always replace me if you want. My philosophy in making PA decisions seems to be so wrong for the long-time PAs out there. (I am not implying that I want to be replace, because I think my philosophy is better. But I do not want to give you any hard time about this Ian.)
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 11, 2020 6:18:55 GMT
The kid is on the upswing, why would he want to sign a 3 year deal for basically minimum when people this offseason would bid on him? That's the critique.
|
|
James Kay

Charlotte Hornets
All Star
Posts: 2,767
Mar 24, 2023 16:24:36 GMT
|
Post by James Kay on Feb 11, 2020 16:36:27 GMT
This is why the rule against 2+ year contracts for the minimum is pointless for protecting the player, because contracts like this are legal.
What’s the difference between this and a min contract - and where are PAs supposed to draw the line?
(
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 11, 2020 17:20:48 GMT
This is why the rule against 2+ year contracts for the minimum is pointless for protecting the player, because contracts like this are legal. What’s the difference between this and a min contract - and where are PAs supposed to draw the line? ( I don't like this contract. But speaking more generally, the reason these contract are allowed and minimums aren't is to handicap team over the cap (which are often the best teams). It gives rebuilding teams, which are often under the cap, a small advantage over the better teams. Which is healthy for the league at large imo
|
|
James Kay

Charlotte Hornets
All Star
Posts: 2,767
Mar 24, 2023 16:24:36 GMT
|
Post by James Kay on Feb 11, 2020 17:24:04 GMT
This is why the rule against 2+ year contracts for the minimum is pointless for protecting the player, because contracts like this are legal. What’s the difference between this and a min contract - and where are PAs supposed to draw the line? ( I don't like this contract. But speaking more generally, the reason these contract are allowed and minimums aren't is to handicap team over the cap (which are often the best teams). It gives rebuilding teams, which are often under the cap, a small advantage over the better teams. Which is healthy for the league at large imo Yes which is why the MLE doesn't exist oh wait. Teams over the cap have always been able to sign players lol
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 11, 2020 18:17:08 GMT
I don't like this contract. But speaking more generally, the reason these contract are allowed and minimums aren't is to handicap team over the cap (which are often the best teams). It gives rebuilding teams, which are often under the cap, a small advantage over the better teams. Which is healthy for the league at large imo Yes which is why the MLE doesn't exist oh wait. Teams over the cap have always been able to sign players lol Well yeah this is to make sure over the cap teams have only 1 avenue to sign players to long term deals. The MLE.
|
|
James Kay

Charlotte Hornets
All Star
Posts: 2,767
Mar 24, 2023 16:24:36 GMT
|
Post by James Kay on Feb 11, 2020 18:35:33 GMT
Yes which is why the MLE doesn't exist oh wait. Teams over the cap have always been able to sign players lol Well yeah this is to make sure over the cap teams have only 1 avenue to sign players to long term deals. The MLE. OK but you can fit like 5 of these deals into the MLE so it’s not very effective at that either. In all honesty the rule should be something like, contracts longer than 3 years must be x% of the salary cap.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Feb 11, 2020 18:42:04 GMT
Well yeah this is to make sure over the cap teams have only 1 avenue to sign players to long term deals. The MLE. OK but you can fit like 5 of these deals into the MLE so it’s not very effective at that either. In all honesty the rule should be something like, contracts longer than 3 years must be x% of the salary cap. I don’t think that’s necessary, although I’m not opposed to it. Player agents should know that 99% of players, especially younger guys would never take a 1 mil*3 deal. There’s times where a player in there 30s takes a deal sorta like that but even that is unlikely. I do think PAs have been pretty good with stuff like this though so I don’t see a huge issue
|
|