|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 10, 2019 12:15:25 GMT
Current: 93 Suggested: 87
He's played in 30 games now, I think we can safely make a change? He is still decent but definitely not playing like a 90+ player.
16.3 ppg, 8.2 rpg, 3.6 apg, 1.3 spg, 1.5 bpg 48% FG 27% 3p
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Apr 10, 2019 12:18:47 GMT
88 - he’s still a force when he’s not tired, as he rag dolled Jokic a few games ago, but agree he’s not worthy of a 90+ rating
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Apr 10, 2019 12:19:52 GMT
88
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
Apr 14, 2024 11:04:23 GMT
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Apr 10, 2019 12:38:26 GMT
hes a big dude coming back from a bad injury and is playing decent just wait till next year when hes even better! Hes still young give this dude a break and wait till next year to lower him sheesh 91
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 10, 2019 12:48:33 GMT
hes a big dude coming back from a bad injury and is playing decent just wait till next year when hes even better! Hes still young give this dude a break and wait till next year to lower him sheesh 91 Yea but its not fair in D5 if he's playing like an 82 in real-life and his D5 team gets him at a 93. We do rating changes often enough now that we can update on this stuff. If he starts playing like a 93 again, then he'll be a 93 again in D5 fairly quickly. 30 games is a pretty decent sample size for a decrease.
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Apr 10, 2019 13:28:30 GMT
87.5
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Apr 10, 2019 13:37:04 GMT
87 - will agree as it isn't fair to keep him at a 93 with no limit restriction in D5. I think 87 is a good medium.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Apr 10, 2019 13:44:18 GMT
87
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Apr 10, 2019 14:12:14 GMT
I don't understand how the general sense in the league is for Cousins to opt-out of his contract and at the same time be deserving to get decreased by 6-pt rating. I think it's fair to say that all of us think that he is not the 90+ player he was which is why it'll be wise for him to opt-in. Again, he is coming back from a serious injury and has yet to play a full season without minutes restriction.
I'd be a little conservative and vote a 90
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Apr 10, 2019 14:22:37 GMT
I just say he is opting out to start controversy, pretty simple.
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Apr 10, 2019 14:31:02 GMT
I just say he is opting out to start controversy, pretty simple. I get it, Kevin. Boogie said he misses you too
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Apr 10, 2019 14:42:23 GMT
I just say he is opting out to start controversy, pretty simple. I get it, Kevin. Boogie said he misses you too He will always be a top three favorite of mine. Love that he doesn't care what anyone thinks. Deuces
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 10, 2019 20:51:40 GMT
I don't wanna be a douche but looking at his pre and post all-star stats (30 games total) you can see a clear and obvious progression of minutes played and him getting back into form.
Thomas got 2 years and Boogie gets a couple months? Idk seems kinda weak.
90.
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Apr 10, 2019 21:40:01 GMT
87
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Apr 10, 2019 21:40:43 GMT
88
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Apr 11, 2019 1:03:50 GMT
We really can change him back if he returns fully to form. Can't be 90+ right now.
87.5
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Apr 11, 2019 18:02:51 GMT
89
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Apr 25, 2019 8:17:11 GMT
Thread closed after 13 votes. New rating = 88
|
|