|
Post by Shane Battier on Dec 13, 2018 0:36:12 GMT
Current: 89 Proposed: 92-93
One of the best two-way players in the league. His addition to the Sixers has made them a better title contender. I can't see the stats online but I'm pretty sure he's one of the top scorers in the 4th quarter. Jimmy Buckets is clutch and has already nailed two game-winning shots in his short time with the Philadelphia.
And most importantly, he beat the wolves starters with third stringers lol
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Dec 13, 2018 0:55:03 GMT
92, he's the man dude. Absolute stud
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 13, 2018 0:57:04 GMT
No change.
He's just not a true franchise player imo. His stats never blow you away (Tobias Harris has better stats this season...) and he hasn't shown he's capable of single-handedly carrying a team. Chicago and Minnesota both had issues while he was there and you never got the sense Jimmy was getting the best out of his teams the way a leader is supposed to do. He's fine where he is and an 89 is generous enough.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Dec 13, 2018 1:18:39 GMT
89 - agree. He has been the same for years.
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Dec 13, 2018 2:11:44 GMT
Yeah no change either — 89
|
|
|
Post by Mark Price on Dec 13, 2018 5:07:13 GMT
Listen, anything is possible if John Wall can still be a 91.
89 seems fair.
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Dec 13, 2018 11:05:46 GMT
I think he could be upgraded to 90, which may be considered the superstar level.
Although I'm not a big fan of his offensive game, he is probably a top 10 wing defender in the NBA who drops almost 20 a night in close numbers to 50-40-90.
90.5
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Dec 13, 2018 19:22:21 GMT
He's fine at an 88, idk. He's just lacking something for me. It doesn't help that every time he's gone somewhere new the past couple years the team he ends up on gets worse somehow.
To the John Wall comment, a lot of his rating is offense based and his play this season has been not up to his normal standards.
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Dec 13, 2018 19:26:51 GMT
He's fine at an 88, idk. He's just lacking something for me. It doesn't help that every time he's gone somewhere new the past couple years the team he ends up on gets worse somehow. To the John Wall comment, a lot of his rating is offense based and his play this season has been not up to his normal standards. FYI he's currently an 89, not 88. But my vote is also no change.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Dec 13, 2018 19:47:14 GMT
He's fine at an 88, idk. He's just lacking something for me. It doesn't help that every time he's gone somewhere new the past couple years the team he ends up on gets worse somehow. To the John Wall comment, a lot of his rating is offense based and his play this season has been not up to his normal standards. FYI he's currently an 89, not 88. But my vote is also no change. Lol best part is I'm on my phone scrolled up saw the 89 and still wrote 88. No change is my vote.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Dec 13, 2018 20:24:59 GMT
I’ll vote 88, I feel like he’s been not-so-great this year IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Dec 13, 2018 21:32:11 GMT
No change. In fact 89 might be too generous. But I'll say no change. Seriously when I was watching Butler's first ever YouTube video I got the feeling I'd find him extremely annoying to be around.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 15, 2018 15:09:57 GMT
89.
I'll peak at his ratings to see if anything needs updated, but I think he's probably rated pretty well.
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Dec 18, 2018 5:21:15 GMT
88 ^^
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Dec 18, 2018 7:28:15 GMT
Thread closed after 13 votes. New rating = 89 (no change).
|
|