|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 19, 2018 8:54:21 GMT
Hope nobody has a problem with me dealing with my old squad. I think this is a pretty fair offer for a late 1st. Sacramento Kings send: 2018 CHA 1st Detroit Pistons send: 2018 Indiana 2nd 2020 Utah 2nd 2020 Toronto 2nd I accept Ghazny Dimalen
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 19, 2018 11:39:02 GMT
That Charlotte pick is currently #29, so it's almost a 2nd Rounder anyway, but I accept.
There's a lot of things you can do with a 1st Rounder - when the rookie draft rolls around it can be combined with other picks to move up in the draft if you've got someone special in mind. Then again that's true of 2nds, but whatever it's not rejectable.
|
|
|
Post by Ghazny Dimalen on Feb 19, 2018 11:46:32 GMT
I accept late 1st rounder is consider a 2nd rounder so i accpet since CB offer me that and who im a to refuse?
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Feb 19, 2018 16:51:57 GMT
Accept
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 19, 2018 22:01:58 GMT
Ugh
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 19, 2018 22:35:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 19, 2018 23:14:59 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 30, 2024 0:01:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 2:24:54 GMT
its just dumb who would trade pick 25 for pick 40 and pick 45 + 46 3 years from now
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 20, 2018 3:54:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 20, 2018 6:57:59 GMT
its just dumb who would trade pick 25 for pick 40 and pick 45 + 46 3 years from now Lol, love the exaggerated predictions.
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on Feb 20, 2018 10:27:23 GMT
Accept.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 20, 2018 14:05:04 GMT
Lol, love the exaggerated predictions. Its not exaggerated its just a fact. Its not like giving up 29 for 34 and 36 to save a guaranteed contract on the books. Its giving up a first rounder for the 40th pick and two future picks that might not even crack the top 50 when its all said and done. Ghazny what'r u doin?
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 20, 2018 14:05:59 GMT
I accept late 1st rounder is consider a 2nd rounder so i accpet since CB offer me that and who im a to refuse? You are you to refuse. Its your job as GM.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 20, 2018 14:09:43 GMT
Great job Chauncey!
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Feb 20, 2018 14:10:38 GMT
Lol, love the exaggerated predictions. Its not exaggerated its just a fact. Its not like giving up 29 for 34 and 36 to save a guaranteed contract on the books. Its giving up a first rounder for the 40th pick and two future picks that might not even crack the top 50 when its all said and done. Ghazny what'r u doin? If the Utah 2020 2nd does not crack the top 50, I will eat an entire 1.5 quart (1.4L) of ice cream live on webcam while discussing how amazing @riogho and his GM abilities are the entire time.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 30, 2024 0:01:27 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 14:12:42 GMT
Lol, love the exaggerated predictions. How is that exaggerated? It's just a stupid fucking trade. You don't just ship off 1sts randomly midseason for a deal that you would 100% be offered when that pick is on the clock and you can see who you want to take. This is just ghazny doing his thing where he refused to make picks because he doesn't know shit about college and is a huge reason Detroit sucks so fucking bad.rigjt now.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 20, 2018 14:27:11 GMT
Its not exaggerated its just a fact. Its not like giving up 29 for 34 and 36 to save a guaranteed contract on the books. Its giving up a first rounder for the 40th pick and two future picks that might not even crack the top 50 when its all said and done. Ghazny what'r u doin? If the Utah 2020 2nd does not crack the top 50, I will eat an entire 1.5 quart (1.4L) of ice cream live on webcam while discussing how amazing @riogho and his GM abilities are the entire time. Almost as good as the shoe. James Kay - never forget. We are still waiting.
|
|
|
Post by Ghazny Dimalen on Feb 21, 2018 0:37:45 GMT
I accept late 1st rounder is consider a 2nd rounder so i accpet since CB offer me that and who im a to refuse? You are you to refuse. Its your job as GM. I know, what i mean who am I to refuse a good offer?beside i want to help CB in a fair way.
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 21, 2018 0:43:11 GMT
I know, what i mean who am I to refuse a good offer?beside i want to help CB in a fair way. Seriously, it's a fair offer. Don't listen to these trolls, Ghazny. Trolling is the only thing they know how to do. If you ignore them they go away.
|
|
|
Post by Ghazny Dimalen on Feb 21, 2018 0:45:17 GMT
I know what I'm doing. don't underestimate a 2nd rounder pick. I know all of you thinks DET win this trade, it doesn't matter to me I think this is just a fair trade that will lift DET again, I know I don't have an obligation to help DET but this is my way of helping in fair way.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 21, 2018 1:05:19 GMT
So, I've sort of abstained from voting so far. This is one where I don't like it on a personal level, I wouldn't do the trade. However, as a TC member, I don't see enough here to reject. The 1st round pick is late enough that I can't reject.
Accept.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Feb 21, 2018 1:21:50 GMT
Accept.
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 21, 2018 1:25:50 GMT
See the thing about the phrase “there isn’t enough here for me to reject the trade” is that it’s continually used in trades like this. If you add them all up, they are enough to royally fuck up a team which is happening.
Trading a first for a mid second and two more future seconds is just stupid. You’ll never recoup that value of that first rounder.
Yeah 3 picks is better than 1, but the level of talent at that 1 pick will be a lot better than those other 3, ESPECIALLY in a draft as deep as this
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 21, 2018 1:57:57 GMT
See the thing about the phrase “there isn’t enough here for me to reject the trade” is that it’s continually used in trades like this. If you add them all up, they are enough to royally fuck up a team which is happening. Trading a first for a mid second and two more future seconds is just stupid. You’ll never recoup that value of that first rounder. Yeah 3 picks is better than 1, but the level of talent at that 1 pick will be a lot better than those other 3, ESPECIALLY in a draft as deep as this I know this is a bit of an odd / different thing, since Ghazny was around before, but, this is his first trade with the Kings and this trade is certainly not ruining his team. And, many other GMs could get better value out of those 3 picks than out of that one pick, with as late as that 1st is. There are hardliners on both sides of the TC debate, we reject too many, then we pass too many. Oh well.
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 21, 2018 2:00:04 GMT
See the thing about the phrase “there isn’t enough here for me to reject the trade” is that it’s continually used in trades like this. If you add them all up, they are enough to royally fuck up a team which is happening. Trading a first for a mid second and two more future seconds is just stupid. You’ll never recoup that value of that first rounder. Yeah 3 picks is better than 1, but the level of talent at that 1 pick will be a lot better than those other 3, ESPECIALLY in a draft as deep as this I understand that I'm an amazing GM, so every time I make a move you gotta watch closely, but saying that a trade like this is royally fucking up a team is ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Feb 21, 2018 2:49:22 GMT
See the thing about the phrase “there isn’t enough here for me to reject the trade” is that it’s continually used in trades like this. If you add them all up, they are enough to royally fuck up a team which is happening. Trading a first for a mid second and two more future seconds is just stupid. You’ll never recoup that value of that first rounder. Yeah 3 picks is better than 1, but the level of talent at that 1 pick will be a lot better than those other 3, ESPECIALLY in a draft as deep as this I understand that I'm an amazing GM, so every time I make a move you gotta watch closely, but saying that a trade like this is royally fucking up a team is ridiculous. Amazing GM, are you sure you don't mean messaging over and over until the person just does what you're asking?
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Feb 21, 2018 2:50:41 GMT
I understand that I'm an amazing GM, so every time I make a move you gotta watch closely, but saying that a trade like this is royally fucking up a team is ridiculous. Amazing GM, are you sure you don't mean messaging over and over until the person just does what you're asking? Whatever gets the job done brah
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 21, 2018 5:50:07 GMT
See the thing about the phrase “there isn’t enough here for me to reject the trade” is that it’s continually used in trades like this. If you add them all up, they are enough to royally fuck up a team which is happening. Trading a first for a mid second and two more future seconds is just stupid. You’ll never recoup that value of that first rounder. Yeah 3 picks is better than 1, but the level of talent at that 1 pick will be a lot better than those other 3, ESPECIALLY in a draft as deep as this I understand that I'm an amazing GM, so every time I make a move you gotta watch closely, but saying that a trade like this is royally fucking up a team is ridiculous. Then you misunderstood my point. That isn't my fault. That's on you, pal.
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 21, 2018 5:58:38 GMT
See the thing about the phrase “there isn’t enough here for me to reject the trade” is that it’s continually used in trades like this. If you add them all up, they are enough to royally fuck up a team which is happening. Trading a first for a mid second and two more future seconds is just stupid. You’ll never recoup that value of that first rounder. Yeah 3 picks is better than 1, but the level of talent at that 1 pick will be a lot better than those other 3, ESPECIALLY in a draft as deep as this I know this is a bit of an odd / different thing, since Ghazny was around before, but, this is his first trade with the Kings and this trade is certainly not ruining his team. And, many other GMs could get better value out of those 3 picks than out of that one pick, with as late as that 1st is. There are hardliners on both sides of the TC debate, we reject too many, then we pass too many. Oh well. There could be more value for this pick, yes. There could be a better time for this pick, yes. Is it rejectable in a vacuum, all things being equal? No. But we don't operate in a vacuum. There's a reason why some teams around the league have no assets and are picked dry. Its because time and time again the TC rationalizes trades by saying things like you said, "this isn't rejectable" By the time the TC is in a position to say a trade will put the team in a really bad position, its usually far too late. Its a hard line to balance and to follow, I understand. And I don't know where to start, but I feel like trades like this need to have a stronger stance than a 4-0 pass or whatever. The TC needs to put people on notice.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 21, 2018 11:26:07 GMT
Trade passed
|
|