|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 17, 2018 9:58:09 GMT
I've never had to impose a time limit on this but maybe it's time we enshrined one in the Rules and called it the Hanamichi Sakuragi rule Hanamichi Sakuragi - to me it would seem fair that you should make your final decision at least 48 hours after the trade was posted, which is in roughly 6 hours time from now. Even if we have that rule today, you cannot xover our trade. And we are a democratic league man, you at least need to get our consensus. And it is not as if what I am doing is damaging the entire league. If other gms will allow that, that will be unfair moving forward. If you can just formulate rules and control things that are not ACTUALLY harming the league, that is too much. It's just rude though imho
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 17, 2018 9:58:57 GMT
Maybe I should be allowed to back out of the trade after 48 hours. Do we even have a valid trade that I can’t back out of right now if both parties haven’t accepted? I know there is a lot to consider but I don’t want my team sitting in limbo for the next week. For the sake of the bond that we have develop.. Give me at most four hours.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 17, 2018 10:00:36 GMT
Even if we have that rule today, you cannot xover our trade. And we are a democratic league man, you at least need to get our consensus. And it is not as if what I am doing is damaging the entire league. If other gms will allow that, that will be unfair moving forward. If you can just formulate rules and control things that are not ACTUALLY harming the league, that is too much. It's just rude though imho Its actually not, because the truth is, this was the idea of Barber. He took the risk of posting it.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 17, 2018 10:07:52 GMT
It's just rude though imho Its actually not, because the truth is, this was the idea of Barber. He took the risk of posting it. haha You're asking for 4 hours but I said 6 hours so take your pick. I also am not entirely sure if that's a good rule, but it's just a bit silly to be messing Josh around imho.
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Feb 17, 2018 10:09:46 GMT
Its actually not, because the truth is, this was the idea of Barber. He took the risk of posting it. haha You're asking for 4 hours but I said 6 hours so take your pick. I also am not entirely sure if that's a good rule, but it's just a bit silly to be messing Josh around imho. For the sake of Josh.. Not because of that rule. I am not trying to ruin his life or anything and I do understand what he is going through, so I will just adjust.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Feb 17, 2018 10:19:16 GMT
Just to clarify to everyone, I did suggest posting this to gauge opinion while Hanamchi was not 100% decided, so I can’t be too upset that he hasn’t accepted/rejected yet. But I guess I didn’t anticipate it taking so long so now I feel like I’m sorta in a weird limbo state while this trade sits here. I don’t blame Hanamchi, it is exactly what we discussed, but I do think there should be some rule about how long a trade can go unaccecpted because theoretically this trade could sit here until the summer or something as currently posted.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 17, 2018 10:25:30 GMT
Just to clarify to everyone, I did suggest posting this to gauge opinion while Hanamchi was not 100% decided, so I can’t be too upset that he hasn’t accepted/rejected yet. In that case it's not so bad I guess.
|
|