Sixers - Wizards

[Allen Iverson]

Philadelphiha trades:

81 Kevin Martin $11,519,840 | $12,439,675
77 George Hill $2,086,359 | $3,069,467
79 Anderson Varejao $7,950,000 | $8,618,182 | $9,286,364 | $9,954,545
76 Corey Brewer $2,480,000 | $2,688,000
2012 1st round pick (Lakers)

Total: $24,036,199

Washington trades:

83 Rashard Lewis $21,136,630 | $22,699,550
78 Jordan Crawford $1,120,440 | $1,198,680 | $2,162,419 | $3,206,867
79 Ty Lawson $1,654,440 | $2,544,529 | $3,610,686
77 Anthony Randolph | $2,911,231 | $4,049,523

Total: $26,822,741


I accept. I'm getting Lawson, one of the best PGs in the league. I also get 2 young players in Crawford and Randolph, though both of their roles will be less IRL next season than what they have last season. Also, I'm getting Rashard Lewis' 20M+ contract here.

Tough to give up on my players especially K-Mart and Hill but I think what I'm about to get is better than what I'm going to give up.

[Glenn Robinson]

erm... You arrive on the scene and immediately trade away Lawson? yikes...

[Deleted]

I like the trade. George Hill is a nice pg for the future.

[Glenn Robinson]

Sept 10, 2012 18:50:47 GMT @griz2385 said:

I like the trade. George Hill is a nice pg for the future.

Over Lawson?

[Deleted]

The overall players being traded for....

[Walt Frazier]

I find it hard to believe no one in this contract has any team options or anything else

[Ian Noble]

I'm certainly willing to accept. I'm not as high on Ty Lawson as everyone else it seems.

[Allen Iverson]

Sept 11, 2012 3:59:10 GMT Walt Frazier said:

I find it hard to believe no one in this contract has any team options or anything else

3


Me too. But thats what the LSD says.

[Jimmy Hopkins]

I accept. First of all, it's not only Lawson who will be out from my team. I'm gonna trade Lewis, who's rating will be way low than he has this year considering his salary.
I'm losing Lawson for a solid backcourt in Martin and Hill who in my opinion, is a nice PG for the future as what San Antonio said.
This may hurt my chances for unibrow but still, I'll have a nice rookie out of the draft.
I also got Varejao, who'll be alongside Nene. Varejao + Nene + Odom + K-Mart + Hill
that will be my projected starting five.

[Danny Longley]

Sept 11, 2012 8:18:35 GMT Ian Noble said:

I'm certainly willing to accept. I'm not as high on Ty Lawson as everyone else it seems.

Pretty hard not to be high on Ty Lawson. 16.4 PPG/6.6 APG/3.7 RPG with 48.8% FG shooting. And that 48.8 is a career low, he's at 49.9 for his career. He doesn't have a class-A star drawing attention away from him to make those stats happen either.

I'll be honest, I don't really watch many Denver games, but I'm assuming the skill level in the guy is pretty high considering he's 5'11 and shooting nearly .500 for his career. He feels more like an 82 to me than a 79, and IMO, is the best asset far and away if you consider Skill (perceived in my case), Age and Contract.

[Dominique Wilkins]

Accept. While I think Washington is getting the better part fo this deal, it's not enuff to reject it.

[Deleted]

Sept 11, 2012 14:30:29 GMT Jimmy Hopkins said:

I accept. First of all, it's not only Lawson who will be out from my team. I'm gonna trade Lewis, who's rating will be way low than he has this year considering his salary.
I'm losing Lawson for a solid backcourt in Martin and Hill who in my opinion, is a nice PG for the future as what San Antonio said.
This may hurt my chances for unibrow but still, I'll have a nice rookie out of the draft.
I also got Varejao, who'll be alongside Nene. Varejao + Nene + Odom + K-Mart + Hill
that will be my projected starting five.

Unibrow wants to be in Sactown anyways I mean he is paying off the Toronto Raptors as we speak.

[Allen Iverson]

*bump

[Andrei Kirilenko]

This is a pretty ugly trade, and Ty Lawson alone is probably worth more than all Washington is getting back, but whatever. I accept

[Deleted]

Sept 12, 2012 16:58:57 GMT Andrei Kirilenko said:

This is a pretty ugly trade, and Ty Lawson alone is probably worth more than all Washington is getting back, but whatever. I accept

Where do u guys come up with this?

[Ian Noble]

Trade passed.

[Walt Frazier]

Weighing in even though trade is already passed - I would have accepted as well. I'd rather get the Lawson side, though I think a couple people are overvaluing Lawson. I am a very big fan of him, maybe people aren't de-valuing his side of the trade with Rashard as much as I would. Or maybe people don't like George Hill, who should be the starting PG outright in Indy now that Collison is in Dallas.

Anyway, certainly not close to rejectable for me. I prefer one side over the other but on value, it is fine.

[Danny Longley]

Sept 13, 2012 0:54:49 GMT Walt Frazier said:

Weighing in even though trade is already passed - I would have accepted as well. I'd rather get the Lawson side, though I think a couple people are overvaluing Lawson. I am a very big fan of him, maybe people aren't de-valuing his side of the trade with Rashard as much as I would. Or maybe people don't like George Hill, who should be the starting PG outright in Indy now that Collison is in Dallas.

Anyway, certainly not close to rejectable for me. I prefer one side over the other but on value, it is fine.

Considering Rashard is an expiring on a year that free agents like CP3 and Dwight are unlikely to be resigned, it's hard to make him a negative.