|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Nov 18, 2017 23:39:01 GMT
Current - 80 Suggested - 84
16.1 pts / 7.1 reb / 1.5 ast / 1.7 stl
56.5 fg% (60.4 2pt%) and 49.1 3pt%
Again, taking a big stride this season. Efficient to say the least.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Nov 19, 2017 0:16:46 GMT
This is the exact type of hot start knee jerk stockwatch I was trying to avoid. Otto is shooting 62% as a perimeter player. There is absolutely 0 chance that stays there
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Nov 19, 2017 0:33:40 GMT
Not voting yet
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Nov 19, 2017 0:47:16 GMT
How are you gonna vote on Embiid and Booker but not vote for someone more established? He shot 57% last year.
GTFO
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
May 7, 2024 8:50:24 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2017 0:49:00 GMT
1
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Nov 19, 2017 1:09:17 GMT
84
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Nov 19, 2017 5:37:50 GMT
How are you gonna vote on Embiid and Booker but not vote for someone more established? He shot 57% last year. GTFO if I voted now I'd vote 81. He shoots the ball well that's about it. If he continues this play for a month longer I'd vote 82 maybe 83. But fine I'll vote, 81
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Nov 19, 2017 5:49:18 GMT
How are you gonna vote on Embiid and Booker but not vote for someone more established? He shot 57% last year. GTFO if I voted now I'd vote 81. He shoots the ball well that's about it. If he continues this play for a month longer I'd vote 82 maybe 83. But fine I'll vote, 81 Mainly talking to Jeremiah, saying he wants to avoid this kind of stuff, but voted to increase Embiid. Also tried to throw out a stat justifying his hypocrisy only for that stat to have almost been obtained by Porter just last season.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Nov 19, 2017 6:16:25 GMT
How are you gonna vote on Embiid and Booker but not vote for someone more established? He shot 57% last year. GTFO He shot 51% from the field and 43% from 3. He is currently at 57% from the field and 50% from 3. I anticipate that 3pt% to regress to the 42-44% area. He's not a Korver level shooter that is gonna actually average 50%+ from 3. If we're sitting here at the allstar break and he's still shooting at that level then yes I'll vote an 83-84 all day. But to me he's only really improved his points total which can be attributed to his incredibly hot start shooting the 3. I voted on Embiid because last year he looked amazing and this year he looks even more impressive. Anyone who's anyone knows that he's amazing. He's probably a 90 and I put him at an 85. If he plays 60-70 games this year and cuts down on his turnovers, gets his 3pt% back to where it was last year and improves his defense next season he'll be a 97-99. If his 3 pointer was falling right now he'd be averaging 30ppg in less than 30 minutes a game meaning like 40ppg per 36 minutes. That's some Wilt level shit right there.
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Nov 19, 2017 20:27:59 GMT
81, let's see if the shooting sustains
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Nov 19, 2017 20:31:53 GMT
From what I can see it looks like Otto is great at shooting, surrounded by Wall and Beal, but I'm not sure he's anything more than above-average in every other facet of his game. I haven't watched enough Wizards basketball to judge though so I'll hang back for now and watch Wizards vs Raptors that's on at a UK-friendly time right now
|
|