|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 14, 2017 16:39:37 GMT
Lou is a much more complete player than Booker and even though he doesn't shoot it 20 times a game his other stats are in every way better than Devin Booker. I know the ppg isn't as impressive but try and be a little more in depth than that.
Current 79
Suggested 82
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 14, 2017 17:38:16 GMT
I think 79 is a good rating for Lou
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Apr 14, 2017 18:11:05 GMT
79
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 14, 2017 19:22:51 GMT
Literally every stat from Lou Williams other than points is better than Booker who was just suggested at over an 80. Sooo. 79?, literally impossible to come to that conclusion unless people aren't looking at stats at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Apr 14, 2017 22:52:11 GMT
80
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Apr 15, 2017 3:15:37 GMT
Literally every stat from Lou Williams other than points is better than Booker who was just suggested at over an 80. Sooo. 79?, literally impossible to come to that conclusion unless people aren't looking at stats at all. Lou is more efficient because he doesn't have as heavy a load to carry as Booker does. He's also having the best year of his career by far and has been trending downwards since arriving in Houston, hence why I'm skeptical an increase is needed |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Apr 15, 2017 5:04:20 GMT
Literally every stat from Lou Williams other than points is better than Booker who was just suggested at over an 80. Sooo. 79?, literally impossible to come to that conclusion unless people aren't looking at stats at all. Lou is more efficient because he doesn't have as heavy a load to carry as Booker does. He's also having the best year of his career by far and has been trending downwards since arriving in Houston, hence why I'm skeptical an increase is needed He did in LA, where the majority of his stats were from. |
|
New Orleans Pelicans
Denver Nuggets
Utah Jazz
