|
Post by James Kay on Mar 6, 2017 22:26:23 GMT
Current: 87 Suggested: 84-85
Honestly, I went to look at Wade’s stats and was expecting to suggest a much lower rating. But he’s still averaging 19, 4, and 4. However, he’s shooting 43% and 32.8% from three for a whopping 50.9TS%, and given his age and a solid drop-off in defensive stats, I don’t think he’s contributing much on that end either. That being said I haven’t watched too many Bulls games this year so I’m totally open to changing my mind if the stats aren’t showing the whole story.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Mar 7, 2017 1:16:57 GMT
Bulls are pretty hot right now tbh. I'll say 85. I think he retires after this or next season anyways.
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Mar 7, 2017 2:23:59 GMT
I'll go 85 too, the Bulls are a hot mess, I don't think it's fair to take his stats this year at face value
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Mar 7, 2017 13:32:48 GMT
Agree...85
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Mar 7, 2017 13:45:44 GMT
I'll go 83.5
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Mar 7, 2017 15:05:39 GMT
82 feels right.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Mar 8, 2017 6:32:16 GMT
I'm actually really surprised. I thought he'd fall off way more this season.
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on Mar 8, 2017 8:36:08 GMT
86.9
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Mar 9, 2017 21:20:33 GMT
86
|
|
|
Post by Brandon Roy on Mar 21, 2017 8:49:15 GMT
85 is ok for him..
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Apr 9, 2017 6:15:26 GMT
84
One more negative thing.... In 57 games, he incurred 94 lost balls turnovers. Last season, he also incurred 94, but in 74 games! And his usage rate is also down!
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on May 17, 2017 13:32:57 GMT
I am not pressuring the RCs but for the sake of a much REALISTIC Playoffs, but for the sake of a more REALISTIC playoffs, I am hoping the RCs will choose the decrease of Wade as one of the priority.
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on May 17, 2017 16:43:58 GMT
I am not pressuring the RCs but for the sake of a much REALISTIC Playoffs, but for the sake of a more REALISTIC playoffs, I am hoping the RCs will choose the decrease of Wade as one of the priority. desperate times.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
Dec 16, 2022 11:27:40 GMT
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on May 18, 2017 20:38:05 GMT
I am not pressuring the RCs but for the sake of a much REALISTIC Playoffs, but for the sake of a more REALISTIC playoffs, I am hoping the RCs will choose the decrease of Wade as one of the priority. I don't really care about DWade and Curry personally, but are we going to get another rating change group processed before the playoffs? I believe we did this last year, so I am just curious. Would love to have the revised Plumlee for the playoff games.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on May 21, 2017 11:26:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 2, 2017 9:28:17 GMT
Wade disappeared for a lot of the Celtics-Bulls series.
83
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jun 2, 2017 12:33:25 GMT
I'd like to change my vote to 81
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Jun 2, 2017 14:16:25 GMT
81.5
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jun 2, 2017 14:19:27 GMT
Changing mine to a 82
|
|
|
Post by JR Wiles on Jun 2, 2017 17:41:43 GMT
81
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Jul 23, 2017 6:29:35 GMT
80
|
|