|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 6, 2017 21:22:57 GMT
The Houston Rockets and Detroit Pistons have come to an agreement of the following terms:
The Houston Rockets will send:
69 RJ Hunter $1,261,800 $1,316,200 $2,096,707 $3,021,354
69 Jarnell Stokes $700,000
69 Damien Inglis (CONTRACT) $700,000
2019 2nd Round Pick HOU
The Detroit Pistons will send:
Nothing
I accept. Need cap room because MLE is a fucking joke
|
|
Vlade Divac
Former Kings GM
Sophomore
Posts: 630
Oct 20, 2024 15:22:14 GMT
|
Post by Vlade Divac on Mar 6, 2017 21:35:02 GMT
I accept as I get free resources for literally $2M to $3M in cap space.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Mar 6, 2017 21:39:44 GMT
Does this put Houston at 11 players?
EDIT: Actually this puts him at 10 players?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 6, 2017 21:39:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 6, 2017 21:48:35 GMT
Does this put Houston at 11 players? EDIT: Actually this puts him at 10 players? I think I can be 2 under |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 18:44:52 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2017 22:59:33 GMT
Lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Mar 7, 2017 1:15:41 GMT
Didn't we make it a rule that you couldn't trade for nothing?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 7, 2017 9:31:12 GMT
Didn't we make it a rule that you couldn't trade for nothing? nope! |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 7, 2017 9:37:04 GMT
I accept
|
|
|
|
DET HOU
Mar 7, 2017 13:42:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Mar 7, 2017 13:42:20 GMT
I accept
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 7, 2017 14:47:07 GMT
Because the MLE is changed/being strictly enforced, I can't sign anyone to a non-minimum contract. And because you can't sign anyone 70 or over to a minimum contract, I am forced to do this shitty trade.
If we are going to enforce the MLE this way, I don't think there should be a restriction on signing 70 or over rated players to a minimum deal. They sign guys over a 70 to a minimum deal ALL THE TIME in the NBA
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Mar 7, 2017 15:36:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 7, 2017 17:05:44 GMT
Actually I feel like maybe this rule should apply: - A trade must not require your team to sign or release more than two players.
Detroit needs to cut two, Houston needs to sign two... |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 7, 2017 18:06:12 GMT
Actually I feel like maybe this rule should apply: - A trade must not require your team to sign or release more than two players.
Detroit needs to cut two, Houston needs to sign two... How? What the fuck? The rule says MORE than two. And specifies to each individual team. |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Mar 7, 2017 19:00:42 GMT
Actually I feel like maybe this rule should apply: Detroit needs to cut two, Houston needs to sign two... How? What the fuck? The rule says MORE than two. And specifies to each individual team. lolwhat. The trade is valid, but with 12 men on your roster you need to sign 2 players if you’re trading away 2 players. But with 14 players on their roster, DET should only have to cut 1 player. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 7, 2017 20:09:40 GMT
Yeah I guess the trade is valid, barely  |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 18:44:52 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 12:36:03 GMT
Actually I feel like maybe this rule should apply: Detroit needs to cut two, Houston needs to sign two... How? What the fuck? The rule says MORE than two. And specifies to each individual team. Then sign two players is his point, don't forget the pass part of puff puff, CB. |
|
Vlade Divac
Former Kings GM
Sophomore
Posts: 630
Oct 20, 2024 15:22:14 GMT
|
Post by Vlade Divac on Mar 8, 2017 16:56:11 GMT
How? What the fuck? The rule says MORE than two. And specifies to each individual team. lolwhat. The trade is valid, but with 12 men on your roster you need to sign 2 players if you’re trading away 2 players. But with 14 players on their roster, DET should only have to cut 1 player. I only cut one player, for the record. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 8, 2017 18:26:57 GMT
How? What the fuck? The rule says MORE than two. And specifies to each individual team. Then sign two players is his point, don't forget the pass part of puff puff, CB. Yes but the rule says that a trade which requires you to sign more than two players is invalid. He is saying it applied when it had no business applying. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 27, 2024 18:44:52 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2017 18:28:29 GMT
Then sign two players is his point, don't forget the pass part of puff puff, CB. Yes but the rule says that a trade which requires you to sign more than two players is invalid. He is saying it applied when it had no business applying. Lol no, he was correcting Josh in that this rule applies so therefore the trade is valid. You proceeded to misinterpret what he was saying and still do even after James & I literally explained it, twice. And now for a third time. |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on Mar 9, 2017 0:10:45 GMT
Ian Noble, At what point would Charles have to sign the players for the trade to be processed? Because I'm reading the situation as : - Trade gets approved, held pending signing of two players - Charles has to sign two players for the trade to process (doesn't have the generated from the trade at this point) - Trade processes If so, then he only actually clears like 1.5m assuming he signs two minimum guys.
|
|
|
|
DET HOU
Mar 9, 2017 1:10:27 GMT
via mobile
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Mar 9, 2017 1:10:27 GMT
Accept
|
|
|
|
DET HOU
Mar 9, 2017 10:09:33 GMT
via mobile
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 9, 2017 10:09:33 GMT
Ian Noble, At what point would Charles have to sign the players for the trade to be processed? Because I'm reading the situation as : - Trade gets approved, held pending signing of two players - Charles has to sign two players for the trade to process (doesn't have the generated from the trade at this point) - Trade processes If so, then he only actually clears like 1.5m assuming he signs two minimum guys. Correct on both points! |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Mar 9, 2017 14:44:47 GMT
Ian Noble , At what point would Charles have to sign the players for the trade to be processed? Because I'm reading the situation as : - Trade gets approved, held pending signing of two players - Charles has to sign two players for the trade to process (doesn't have the generated from the trade at this point) - Trade processes If so, then he only actually clears like 1.5m assuming he signs two minimum guys. Correct on both points! If you can't process the trade till I sign 2 players, and I have no space to sign two players, why can't I just sign the guys I am trying to sign right now? There's so much redundancy and fuckery going on with everything in this league |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Mar 9, 2017 15:50:16 GMT
why can't I just sign the guys I am trying to sign right now? Am I supposed to telepathically know who these two players are? |
|
|
|
Post by Danny Longley on Mar 9, 2017 16:06:36 GMT
If you can't process the trade till I sign 2 players, and I have no space to sign two players, why can't I just sign the guys I am trying to sign right now? There's so much redundancy and fuckery going on with everything in this league I don't think you're getting the point here Charles. The basic rule that we're complying with here is roster size as Josh pointed out: Your team's roster must not exceed 15 players or dip below 12 players at any time during the regular season. This trade would take your team to 10 players as you're trading two for none. To make it a legal, (process-able?) trade, you have to sign two players so that even after this trade is processed, you never at any point sink below the 12 player minimum. You can't even offer with the amount you intend to because you don't have it yet at this point. |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Mar 9, 2017 16:10:51 GMT
If you can't process the trade till I sign 2 players, and I have no space to sign two players, why can't I just sign the guys I am trying to sign right now? There's so much redundancy and fuckery going on with everything in this league No. You have space to sign two players. Two minimum contract players. Teams can always offer the minimum when they’re over the cap. All your angst seems to just stem from general confusion. |
|
Vlade Divac
Former Kings GM
Sophomore
Posts: 630
Oct 20, 2024 15:22:14 GMT
|
Post by Vlade Divac on Mar 9, 2017 16:45:07 GMT
You can back out if you want, Charles.
|
|
|
|
DET HOU
Mar 9, 2017 16:51:09 GMT
via mobile
Post by James Kay on Mar 9, 2017 16:51:09 GMT
You can back out if you want, Charles. he actually can't since he posted it which is an acceptance |
|
Vlade Divac
Former Kings GM
Sophomore
Posts: 630
Oct 20, 2024 15:22:14 GMT
|
Post by Vlade Divac on Mar 10, 2017 0:14:08 GMT
You can back out if you want, Charles. he actually can't since he posted it which is an acceptance Right, but I am willing to let him if he misunderstood a rule and Ian allows it. Despite my flaws, I am not a douche and do not want to gain a competitive advantage just because someone else misunderstood something. |
|
Brooklyn Nets
Boston Celtics
Minnesota Timberwolves
Charlotte Hornets
Dallas Mavericks
Toronto Raptors
