|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 29, 2016 17:47:25 GMT
Charlotte signs Nate Wolters to the following conract:
1 year: $4,240,000
Salary after signing: $69,998,982
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 29, 2016 19:29:13 GMT
I know what's up here...
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 29, 2016 19:37:49 GMT
What!!! Hahaha  |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 29, 2016 21:48:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 29, 2016 21:53:16 GMT
Can I trade Nate... If not, I'm going to have to protest. Seems really unfair to make a rule change in direct response to a signing. I have a whole pending trade waiting. The rule seems totally fair, but I don't think it's fair to enact it immediately in response to a single signing I made. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 29, 2016 21:55:47 GMT
Can I trade Nate... If not, I'm going to have to protest. Seems really unfair to make a rule change in direct response to a signing. I have a whole pending trade waiting. The rule seems totally fair, but I don't think it's fair to enact it immediately in response to a single signing I made. Yeah that's what I meant, you can trade him etc. But the rule comes into effect after this has gone through. Repeating just in case: you can trade Nate Wolters after this. |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 29, 2016 21:57:25 GMT
Can I trade Nate... If not, I'm going to have to protest. Seems really unfair to make a rule change in direct response to a signing. I have a whole pending trade waiting. The rule seems totally fair, but I don't think it's fair to enact it immediately in response to a single signing I made. Yeah that's what I meant, you can trade him etc. But the rule comes into effect after this has gone through. Repeating just in case: you can trade Nate Wolters after this. Alright, that’s fair then. I was scared you were slapping me with a rule change out of nowhere haha. |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 29, 2016 22:00:10 GMT
Can I trade Nate... If not, I'm going to have to protest. Seems really unfair to make a rule change in direct response to a signing. I have a whole pending trade waiting. The rule seems totally fair, but I don't think it's fair to enact it immediately in response to a single signing I made. Yeah that's what I meant, you can trade him etc. But the rule comes into effect after this has gone through. Repeating just in case: you can trade Nate Wolters after this. You are a fair and reasonable commissioner, Ian Noble, quite befitting your last name  |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 29, 2016 22:15:17 GMT
Yeah that's what I meant, you can trade him etc. But the rule comes into effect after this has gone through. Repeating just in case: you can trade Nate Wolters after this. You are a fair and reasonable commissioner, Ian Noble, quite befitting your last name And now... in potentially the most terrifying response I will ever give... |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 11:35:17 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 0:09:01 GMT
Make sure the rule accounts for the contracts too because otherwise he could sign them and then cut them to trade the dead money, which technically gets around of the rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 30, 2016 0:11:41 GMT
Make sure the rule accounts for the contracts too because otherwise he could sign them and then cut them to trade the dead money, which technically gets around of the rule. haha pretty sure the spirit of the rule covers that already |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 11:35:17 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2016 3:30:49 GMT
Make sure the rule accounts for the contracts too because otherwise he could sign them and then cut them to trade the dead money, which technically gets around of the rule. haha pretty sure the spirit of the rule covers that already Yeah well, that doesn't really matter. Someone will try it and pull then protest because it's not actually a rule yet. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 30, 2016 21:55:06 GMT
This is the dumbest thing ever, no offense.
|
|
Charlotte Hornets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
