|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 20, 2015 22:33:46 GMT
Haha, I think you can remove the joke votes for Josh Smith.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 21:01:36 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2015 22:47:04 GMT
Just trying to help Walt out so I've tallied all the older Stock Watches for easier viewing. I rounded up on decimals that came up. Kyle Lowry - 84-86-87-87-87-88-88-90 = 87 Otto Porter - 75-75.5-76-76.5-77-78-78.5-79= 77 Jamal Crawford - 74-74-75-75-76-76-76-76-77= 76 Nic Batum - 83-83-83-84-84-84-84-84-84-85-85= 84 Al Jefferson- 82-82-82-83-83-83-84-84-84-84-84-84-85-85= 84 Ty Lawson- 77-79-79-79.5-80-80-80= 80 Paul Pierce- 75-76-76-76-76-76-76= 76 Paul Milsap- 85-86-87-88.5-88.5= 87 Nene Hilario- 74-75-76-76-76-76.5-77-77= 76 Kobe Bryant- 70-75-75-76-77-78-78-78-79-80-80= 78 Greivis Vaquez- 73-74-75-75.5-76-76.5-78-78= 76 Kristaps Porzingis- 77-77-77.5-77.5-78-78-78= 78 Draymond Green- 83-84-85-85-85-85-85-86-87-87= 85 Josh Smith- 49-72-75-75-75-75-76-77-77-77-77-99= 76 Andre Drummond- 83-83-83-84-84-84-84-84-86-86-87= 84 Jae Crowder- 75-76-76-77-77-78= 77 Thomas Robinson- 69-69-69-69-69= 69 Steph Curry- 93-95-95-95.5-96-96-96-97= 96 So uh, those threads are closed? |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Dec 20, 2015 23:38:39 GMT
Missed the David Lee one. That is the biggest joke of a rating currently.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Dec 22, 2015 11:55:13 GMT
Jordan Clarkson: 78-77-77-77-76.5-80-77-78 = 78
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on Dec 22, 2015 14:46:44 GMT
Kobe Bryant- 70-75-75-76-77-78-78-78-79-80-80= 78 Where is my 2? |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 2, 2016 4:37:57 GMT
Rating Changes - D5.xlsx (14.41 KB) Started to put together a excel spreadsheet for rating changes. I will continue to update through the days. Hopefully, this helps Walt some.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 2, 2016 5:13:05 GMT
View AttachmentStarted to put together a excel spreadsheet for rating changes. I will continue to update through the days. Hopefully, this helps Walt some. That's pretty awesome man. Can you work with Jeremiah Hill and see what the two of you come up with? Either stay on this path with his help or see if you can help him with what he's working on right now? Either way, great stuff! |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 2, 2016 5:45:26 GMT
Only thing that's nice to have for the future is the current rating. Gives me/us a reference when I go to add a certain amount of points to the categories. Otherwise - awesome! |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 2, 2016 12:55:05 GMT
Only thing that's nice to have for the future is the current rating. Gives me/us a reference when I go to add a certain amount of points to the categories. Otherwise - awesome! The excel file I put together does have the current rating, or were you talking to Jeremiah? |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 2, 2016 13:24:52 GMT
Only thing that's nice to have for the future is the current rating. Gives me/us a reference when I go to add a certain amount of points to the categories. Otherwise - awesome! The excel file I put together does have the current rating, or were you talking to Jeremiah? Talking to Jeremiah. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 2, 2016 13:27:48 GMT
The excel file I put together does have the current rating, or were you talking to Jeremiah? Talking to Jeremiah. Okay. I am going to make a second page that pulls from the first and lists them from highest to lowest change in rating. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 2, 2016 13:31:00 GMT
Okay. I am going to make a second page that pulls from the first and lists them from highest to lowest change in rating. Dunno if it's any easier but Jeremiah basically finished tallying all of the ratings except a few current ones still getting votes, last night. Check his first post in this thread. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 2, 2016 13:33:38 GMT
Yeah, I saw that. I think having the excel file updated will help for future changes too.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 2, 2016 13:38:01 GMT
Not sure how some of the average rating changes were calculated, but some are off. Garnetts rating should become a 72, not a 73. The average vote is 72.29 right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 2, 2016 14:33:21 GMT
Not sure how some of the average rating changes were calculated, but some are off. Garnetts rating should become a 72, not a 73. The average vote is 72.29 right now. More than likely a typo somewhere. But yea you're right. |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 2, 2016 19:38:23 GMT
Not sure how some of the average rating changes were calculated, but some are off. Garnetts rating should become a 72, not a 73. The average vote is 72.29 right now. We don't do an average. We do a median of all the votes. So you basically take the middle vote. why? |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 2, 2016 19:41:49 GMT
Why would we take the median? That makes no sense at all. The median is not sensitive to changes in data, where the mean is. The data is pretty symmetric, or otherwise it could be influenced heavily by large deviations. Using the median would be wrong, I would think.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 2, 2016 19:43:13 GMT
From the rating summary....
A GM in this league posts a thread, lobbying for either an increase or a decrease for a player.
1a - Any and all GM's from D5 vote on the player in that thread.
1b - All votes are tallied and accumulated. The highest and lowest ratings are thrown out, and the rest are averaged (mean) to find the new rating for that player.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 21:01:36 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2016 20:38:32 GMT
Why would we take the median? That makes no sense at all. The median is not sensitive to changes in data, where the mean is. The data is pretty symmetric, or otherwise it could be influenced heavily by large deviations. Using the median would be wrong, I would think. It usually ends up being the exact same. In 45 changes I did the other day the median and the (truncated) mean only gave a different overall 4 times and that was cause rounding. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 2, 2016 22:43:25 GMT
Just to be uber clear though, it is the mean (average), after we eliminate both the highest and lowest rating.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 2, 2016 22:45:02 GMT
Just to be uber clear though, it is the mean (average), after we eliminate both the highest and lowest rating. Which is exactly what Kevin posted from the other thread. Thanks! |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 3, 2016 0:44:02 GMT
Why would we take the median? That makes no sense at all. The median is not sensitive to changes in data, where the mean is. The data is pretty symmetric, or otherwise it could be influenced heavily by large deviations. Using the median would be wrong, I would think. It usually ends up being the exact same. In 45 changes I did the other day the median and the (truncated) mean only gave a different overall 4 times and that was cause rounding. It would be different if more than the same 10 people voted. |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 4, 2016 3:28:13 GMT
Rating Changes - D5.xlsx (19.73 KB) This is my updated spreadsheet. It contains all of the updated voting for players on the first and second page of the rating changes (up to Kwahi). The second tab is for a deciding which players need reworked first.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jan 7, 2016 13:44:56 GMT
Is there a way to delete or close threads for players whose rating was changed? That way we don't have people posting in threads that are irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 7, 2016 21:32:12 GMT
Is there a way to delete or close threads for players whose rating was changed? That way we don't have people posting in threads that are irrelevant. Ian can do it, or he can give that power to me, I'd be willing. Otherwise we can just post "closed" when we're done with the thread. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on Jan 11, 2016 5:12:01 GMT
I can understand why you did not put my 2 for Kobe but I just updated my rating for Kristaps to 80.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on Jan 11, 2016 5:18:55 GMT
I can understand why you did not put my 2 for Kobe but I just updated my rating for Kristaps to 80. Some of my other votes also don't show. If you are not counting my votes for some reason please let me know so I stop losing my time... |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 11, 2016 5:19:42 GMT
I can understand why you did not put my 2 for Kobe but I just updated my rating for Kristaps to 80. Some of my other votes also don't show. If you are not counting my votes for some reason please let me know so I stop losing my time... He may have just tallied before you got them in? Not sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on Jan 11, 2016 5:21:03 GMT
There are old votes I made that don't show up either. Really, I could care less but I want to know so I stop voting.
|
|
Denver Nuggets
Cleveland Cavaliers
Minnesota Timberwolves
Charlotte Hornets
