|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jun 14, 2012 1:57:02 GMT
Utah Trades: 84 Paul Millsap $8,103,435 $8,603,633 75 Mike Dunleavy $3,750,000 $3,750,000 72 Earl Watson $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Total: $13,853,435
Memphis Trades: 85 Carlos Boozer $13,500,000 $15,000,000 $15,300,000 $16,800,000
Total: $13,500,000
As the soon-to-be Jazz GM, I accept. I think this trade gives my team a viable long-term option with a full-sized power forward. Besides, Boozer belongs in Utah!
|
|
Sam Presti
Former Grizzlies GM
Rookie
Posts: 55
Oct 29, 2012 2:04:41 GMT
|
Post by Sam Presti on Jun 14, 2012 2:02:23 GMT
I accept I get rid of the long deal of Boozer and don't lose anything and I get my backup pg plus more depth for my bench
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 14, 2012 17:35:37 GMT
This trade would take Memphis below the league minimum 12 players.
|
|
Sam Presti
Former Grizzlies GM
Rookie
Posts: 55
Oct 29, 2012 2:04:41 GMT
|
Post by Sam Presti on Jun 14, 2012 17:55:09 GMT
This trade would take Memphis below the league minimum 12 players. Do you mean Jazz because I'm getting 2 guys back?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Apr 25, 2024 20:20:34 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2012 18:49:39 GMT
This trade would take Memphis below the league minimum 12 players. Do you mean Jazz because I'm getting 2 guys back? Yes, just send Memphis one crappy guy (if you have one) and you'll be good.
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jun 14, 2012 22:37:09 GMT
According to the LSD, I currently have 15 players? And this would put me at 13.
If this is incorrect, then we have agreed to include in the deal: 70 Lester Hudson $137,804
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 14, 2012 23:04:47 GMT
Sorry I got the teams the wrong way around ;D
If I were Memphis I wouldn't do this deal. It's never a great idea to trade away quality for quantity imho, but I accept I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jun 15, 2012 0:26:40 GMT
Trade is pretty even IMO. The part I like the least is Boozer's contract in year 3 and 4...
His year 1 and 2 isn't as big of a deal, because you have to take Dunleavy and Watson with Millsap, which makes the first 2 years a wash on total salary, and Memphis has to take on two extra players none-the-less.
I basically like Memphis getting Millsap and ridding himself of that large contract, but I don't like that he had to take Dunleavy and Watson...but those guys aren't scrubs either, so overall, the value is even- ish.
Accept.
|
|
Lucas Lutkus
Former Bobcats GM
Sophomore
Posts: 684
Jul 16, 2013 9:57:53 GMT
|
Post by Lucas Lutkus on Jun 15, 2012 2:12:43 GMT
As a Bulls fan i don't like this to Utah hahaha, Boozer is much worse than Millsap in the last 2 seasons, but IMO it's not anything rejectable.
|
|
|
Post by Aubrey Graham on Jun 15, 2012 5:27:24 GMT
I accept, Millsap has much more value than Boozer at this point IMO. He's on a much more manageable contract, younger and is arguably the better player at this point
|
|
Sam Presti
Former Grizzlies GM
Rookie
Posts: 55
Oct 29, 2012 2:04:41 GMT
|
Post by Sam Presti on Jun 17, 2012 1:11:30 GMT
Passed?
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jun 17, 2012 8:54:22 GMT
Trade passed.
|
|