|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jul 16, 2015 2:48:28 GMT
MEM Trades -
71 Steve Blake $1,250,000
65 Stephen Jackson $5,435,000
LAL Trades -
None
LAL needs some warm bodies. I need to make space for something.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jul 16, 2015 2:51:45 GMT
Rule Proposal for Future Trades like this. The team trading nothing trades "Cash Considerations" which is a 1 million dollar cap hold.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 10:38:56 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2015 3:04:11 GMT
Rule Proposal for Future Trades like this. The team trading nothing trades "Cash Considerations" which is a 1 million dollar cap hold. The hold should definitely exist, because in real life these trades are not free like they are here, and it should be a % of the cap. Say 1-2% depending on the size of the contract taken on. The holds should be non tradeable and last until the end of the season. |
|
Magic Johnson
Former Lakers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 458
Feb 27, 2024 20:39:01 GMT
|
Post by Magic Johnson on Jul 16, 2015 3:30:27 GMT
I accept fills out last part of roster with this move.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jul 16, 2015 11:28:42 GMT
I like the cap hold idea
|
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jul 16, 2015 19:08:20 GMT
I don't really like this trend of all these nothing trades coming out now. I like the Cash Considerations cap hold idea.
Anyway, while it's still within the rules, I accept.
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jul 16, 2015 19:58:59 GMT
Maybe the committee should adopt a policy before letting another one of these trades go through? I am speaking in terms of after this trade - just to be fair.
|
|
|
|
MEM - LAL
Jul 16, 2015 20:20:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 16, 2015 20:20:11 GMT
Agree with Alex.
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 16, 2015 20:55:48 GMT
I get that it's weird for nothing trades to happen, but I still don't see the problem with them. Why does another team have to include a token asset?
I accept.
|
|
|
|
MEM - LAL
Jul 17, 2015 13:21:41 GMT
via mobile
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 17, 2015 13:21:41 GMT
I get that it's weird for nothing trades to happen, but I still don't see the problem with them. Why does another team have to include a token asset? I accept. It just looks funny. Some part of my brain would be a lot happier if instead of saying "nothing" on the one side of the trade, it listed the cap space gained. But that's really what the one side gets of course. And roster space. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 20, 2015 19:04:18 GMT
Trade passed.
|
|
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Boston Celtics
