|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on May 30, 2015 6:33:20 GMT
Current Rating: 83
Suggested Rating: 87
|
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on May 30, 2015 7:56:26 GMT
85
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 20:45:32 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2015 9:33:27 GMT
Not only an offensive and conditioning beast but also a lockdown defender.
86
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 20:45:32 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on May 30, 2015 9:34:03 GMT
Oh but stock watch is closed until the offseason. Maybe it is the offseason for the Jimmy Butler team and that's good enough?
|
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on May 30, 2015 12:41:48 GMT
88. Most Improved Player
We all know about his defensive prowess but he was on another level this season for the Bulls.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on May 30, 2015 14:34:26 GMT
Not only an offensive and conditioning beast but also a lockdown defender. That is why I gave him a 87. He does pretty much everything well. |
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on May 30, 2015 14:39:05 GMT
88 straight up beast at this point as good as peak PG
|
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on May 30, 2015 20:26:08 GMT
I'll change mine to 87, I was legit blackout drunk when I made my previous post - whoops  |
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Jun 1, 2015 2:54:25 GMT
85
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jun 1, 2015 10:22:06 GMT
I use Kawhi as a parameter. For me, Butler is better offensively but Kawhi is better defensively. But the advantage of Jimmy in offense is much bigger than the advantage of Kawhi in defense. Add to that, he have better handles.
but I see Kawhi as an 88. Hmmm.. but according to the majority, he is a 85.
so I think Jimmy is a 87 right now
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 20:45:32 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2015 11:33:43 GMT
I use Kawhi as a parameter. For me, Butler is better offensively but Kawhi is better defensively. But the advantage of Jimmy in offense is much bigger than the advantage of Kawhi in defense. Add to that, he have better handles. but I see Kawhi as an 88. Hmmm.. but according to the majority, he is a 85. so I think Jimmy is a 87 right now Good comparison. |
|
JR Wiles
Rookie
Posts: 194
|
Post by JR Wiles on Jun 1, 2015 12:12:54 GMT
You guys "AGAIN", are way overrating Jimmy. He's an above average starter, but he's not in the 88 range for sure. He played well during the season, but once in the playoffs he didn't play to that same level. Even before the injury and right after. I know we have changed the way we rate players, but even a player that averaged 26ppg a few seasons back never went above the 87 mark.I think his rating is fine until after we see what he does the first half of the season. I'm sure Chicago won't let him walk, but if he does switch teams... How good will he be? Sometimes players tend to play better in some systems. If he goes to a system where he is 2nd or even maybe the 3rd option, his numbers surely will decrease. He's a good defender as well. I just think you guys are jumping on the hype way to fast , just like we did with Rondo. The highest I would go for now would be an 85. Anything above that is just stupid and should be ignored as a rating until he proves himself a little more.
85
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on Jun 1, 2015 22:37:32 GMT
Personally, I voted 87 because I agree with what you say but I think he is playing more like a 89 at the moment. Even if he is not a superstar, I would give him high ratings in pretty much every category and that would get him a very high overall. just like we did with Rondo. Difference is Rondo can't shoot. |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 1, 2015 23:32:19 GMT
Stamina (38 mins a game holy shit), this guy can ball and is really a testament to how good Thibs is at developing players (30th pick) Good 2 pt % is a guy who can finish and effectively shoot the 3 ball. A killer on defense.
86 OVR. In contention for 2nd or 3rd best SG in the league.
|
|
JR Wiles
Rookie
Posts: 194
|
Post by JR Wiles on Jun 2, 2015 12:30:53 GMT
Lets see how he does with a new coach or a new team.
He is def far from one of the top guards in the league. There are several still ahead that are proven. More than just one or two seasons proven.
Going to change my vote to 83 until I see more.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam Bowie on Jun 3, 2015 1:26:31 GMT
Lets see how he does with a new coach or a new team. He is def far from one of the top guards in the league. There are several still ahead that are proven. More than just one or two seasons proven. Going to change my vote to 83 until I see more. Then, why did you give him a 85 in Jan. 19 when he was even more unproven?  dynasty5ive.proboards.com/post/30813 |
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah Hill on Jun 7, 2015 4:17:06 GMT
Lets see how he does with a new coach or a new team. He is def far from one of the top guards in the league. There are several still ahead that are proven. More than just one or two seasons proven. Going to change my vote to 83 until I see more. Then, why did you give him a 85 in Jan. 19 when he was even more unproven? dynasty5ive.proboards.com/post/30813Ohhhhhh!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Jan 6, 2016 3:48:47 GMT
90.
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 6, 2016 3:56:11 GMT
This change is already being processed. Please open a new thread on him. Shane Battier |
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Jan 6, 2016 4:52:56 GMT
This change is already being processed. Please open a new thread on him. Shane BattierNoted. Thanks, Walt. |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 6, 2016 4:54:48 GMT
This change is already being processed. Please open a new thread on him. Shane BattierNoted. Thanks, Walt. You're Welcome. His new rating will be an 87, we've already done some work on him. Can definitely use some extra points, a 90 may be warranted but let's see what the league says! |
|
Chicago Bulls
New Orleans Pelicans
Cleveland Cavaliers
Minnesota Timberwolves
