|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Feb 20, 2015 15:24:52 GMT
Some love for Pope?
Having a decent year this year
Points: 11.9
Reb: 3.1
Ast: 1.1
Stl: 1.1
FT: 69.2%
3pt: 34.9%
3pt: 1.8 per game
FG: 39.6%
Minutes: 30:48 per game
way better than last year
Points: 5.9
Stl: 0.9
Ast: 0.7
Reb: 2.0
FT: 77%
3pt%: 31.9%
FG: 39.6%
Minutes: 19:46 per game
Current Rating: 72
New Rating: 77
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 9:06:35 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 16:02:46 GMT
still pretty shitty production for that many minutes 75
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 20, 2015 16:18:29 GMT
Really bad percentages and no peripheral stats. He honestly just plays a lot I think he sucks
73
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 20, 2015 17:10:29 GMT
Too soon for me for the upper 70's rating Bryan. I feel like his numbers should be up more, they seem far off of his PER 36 from last season, but maybe I'm wrong, doing that math in my head.
Anyways, I'll go with a 74. I think the kid's future is bright, especially if he develops an outside shot in the Monroe-Drummond front court centric offense. I see him as a slasher though maybe I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bryan Colangelo on Feb 20, 2015 17:26:05 GMT
ah fine, had to try lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 20, 2015 19:39:26 GMT
Any SW thread is good, he will probably get a couple OVR points for a bump, but, it allows us to go in and look to see if everything is in the right place. Like, opening up someone's torso just to make sure the organs are in the right spots and everything is functioning properly. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 9:06:35 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 19:41:25 GMT
Any SW thread is good, he will probably get a couple OVR points for a bump, but, it allows us to go in and look to see if everything is in the right place. Like, opening up someone's torso just to make sure the organs are in the right spots and everything is functioning properly. I think it would be cool to get the more objective categories, like FG and and passing and stuff like that regularized among the positions. Like a 45% field goal percentage = 75 in game rating for a SF, and it was consistent like that. Is it already like this for some individual categories? |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 20, 2015 19:48:21 GMT
Any SW thread is good, he will probably get a couple OVR points for a bump, but, it allows us to go in and look to see if everything is in the right place. Like, opening up someone's torso just to make sure the organs are in the right spots and everything is functioning properly. I think it would be cool to get the more objective categories, like FG and and passing and stuff like that regularized among the positions. Like a 45% field goal percentage = 75 in game rating for a SF, and it was consistent like that. Is it already like this for some individual categories? Yes it basically is. We have graphs with the ranges of each, what is high, what is low, what a 34% 3PT equates to in 3PT rating basically. Its all pretty standard stuff. But a SW thread allows us the opportunity to go in and make sure it is correct. We aren't just going in and re-arranging players ratings to keep them in line without a thread being opened up. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 9:06:35 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 19:51:15 GMT
I think it would be cool to get the more objective categories, like FG and and passing and stuff like that regularized among the positions. Like a 45% field goal percentage = 75 in game rating for a SF, and it was consistent like that. Is it already like this for some individual categories? Yes it basically is. We have graphs with the ranges of each, what is high, what is low, what a 34% 3PT equates to in 3PT rating basically. Its all pretty standard stuff. But a SW thread allows us the opportunity to go in and make sure it is correct. We aren't just going in and re-arranging players ratings to keep them in line without a thread being opened up. Thats awesome. |
|
|
|
Post by Charles Barkley on Feb 20, 2015 19:53:52 GMT
Yes it basically is. We have graphs with the ranges of each, what is high, what is low, what a 34% 3PT equates to in 3PT rating basically. Its all pretty standard stuff. But a SW thread allows us the opportunity to go in and make sure it is correct. We aren't just going in and re-arranging players ratings to keep them in line without a thread being opened up. Thats awesome. Its like I've been saying all along, the players you see in real life are as accurately represented as possible in the game. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Nov 30, 2024 9:06:35 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2015 20:13:34 GMT
75, MY DRAFT PICK IS PLAYING WELL!
|
|
Kevin Hollis
Former Thunder GM for 7 years
All Star
Posts: 2,838 
|
Post by Kevin Hollis on Feb 20, 2015 22:19:57 GMT
72
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 21, 2015 2:31:34 GMT
73.5
|
|
|
|
Post by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar on Feb 25, 2015 20:05:50 GMT
73 ^^
|
|
Toronto Raptors
New Orleans Pelicans
Minnesota Timberwolves
Washington Wizards
