|
Post by James Kay on Dec 13, 2013 17:23:58 GMT
He's marked as 63 pending change to 72, but I think that it could be even higher. He's had a bunch of triple doubles this year already, is the glue guy for the whole Pacers team, and is definitely worth a rating of at least 74 or higher.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Dec 15, 2013 20:30:00 GMT
I think a 76 for him, I think if he could get more minutes he'd get a lot more recognition.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 17, 2013 3:40:07 GMT
76 is a safe rating, he's probably a little better but that works for now.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 18, 2013 2:34:54 GMT
Agreed on 76. I think he's in the perfect situation with the Pacers and might be over achieving a little.
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jan 19, 2014 11:12:09 GMT
I'm going to raise the bar for Lance to a 79. Maybe even 80.
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 20, 2014 3:32:42 GMT
He's probably worth an 80, just hope other players are given the same chance to get two possible jumps in rating levels twice in one month. (I'm looking at Terrence Jones when he keeps this up for another month, he then gets the chance to bump up to 79 area as well).
We'll see.........
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jan 20, 2014 3:33:44 GMT
Also he's a funny player, as much as he kind of does everything, he doesn't - On the SEASON he has 3 blocks and 28 steals (in 38 games).
|
|
|
Post by Shaquille O'Neal on Jan 21, 2014 15:22:45 GMT
80 for me.
|
|
|
Post by Clyde Drexler on Jan 22, 2014 4:55:41 GMT
78 for me
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jan 22, 2014 8:13:29 GMT
I like 78
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Feb 3, 2014 22:31:17 GMT
78 at least for Lance, based on this thread. In fact I'm going to raise him right now, because he's still a 63... which is absurd and makes the entire league look behind the times!
|
|