|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 6, 2023 14:42:32 GMT
#51 Colin Castleton
#52 is next
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 6, 2023 14:43:29 GMT
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
 Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416 
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Jul 6, 2023 17:51:25 GMT
With the #52 pick in the D5 draft, the Sacramento Kings select Ricky Counsel 4 / Arkansas / 76ers Shane Battier up |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 6, 2023 21:29:22 GMT
Fools. Can you please show an evidence that I ever changed picks in the history of D5.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jul 7, 2023 2:28:25 GMT
Fools. Can you please show an evidence that I ever changed picks in the history of D5. I totally agree with this. I don't recall this happening. If it has, there should be some evidence, like an edited post in a draft thread, something like that. I don't understand how this could possibly be allowed without precedent. If there is precedent, it should be amended so this is the last time. |
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 7, 2023 2:41:49 GMT
Fools. Can you please show an evidence that I ever changed picks in the history of D5. I totally agree with this. I don't recall this happening. If it has, there should be some evidence, like an edited post in a draft thread, something like that. I don't understand how this could possibly be allowed without precedent. If there is precedent, it should be amended so this is the last time. Correct, Hana did not chance his pick here. However, Ian was going to allow him to change the pick if it was done before the draft finished. Hana wanted to get unlimited time to make his selection for 60 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jul 7, 2023 2:48:47 GMT
Ian NobleI totally agree with this. I don't recall this happening. If it has, there should be some evidence, like an edited post in a draft thread, something like that. I don't understand how this could possibly be allowed without precedent. If there is precedent, it should be amended so this is the last time. Correct, Hana did not chance his pick here. However, Ian was going to allow him to change the pick if it was done before the draft finished. Hana wanted to get unlimited time to make his selection for 60 😂 Sure but 1) he didn't change his pick and 2) that's actually only after Ian changed the deadline from 1 week to 1 day. |
|
|
|
Post by James Kay on Jul 7, 2023 2:49:16 GMT
So when you asked this question I thought you meant you were going to change your pick immediately because you had a quick change of heart. I didn't think you meant: "I'm going to sit on this decision and take even longer than I've already had". So no, you can't change your picks now. The draft is over - which answers Walt Frazier's question above also. |
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Jul 7, 2023 4:59:51 GMT
about to make my pick. what's the final verdict with Scal's changing of pick?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 7, 2023 8:41:41 GMT
about to make my pick. what's the final verdict with Scal's changing of pick? Scal's pick change can stand. If we want to change that rule let's discuss elsewhere. |
|
|
|
Post by Shane Battier on Jul 7, 2023 8:57:07 GMT
With the 53rd pick of the D5 2023 Draft, the Chicago Bulls select Omari Moore.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 9:27:20 GMT
about to make my pick. what's the final verdict with Scal's changing of pick? Scal's pick change can stand. If we want to change that rule let's discuss elsewhere. Where is the rule that states that we can change pick? |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 7, 2023 9:30:36 GMT
Scal's pick change can stand. If we want to change that rule let's discuss elsewhere. Where is the rule that states that we can change pick? Don't you know? It's been under your nose all this time... but you were too afraid to see it. /sarcasm I could definitely find instances of when it happened in past D5 rookie drafts but that would take some time. It's not a written rule. If you want a written rule we can add one, I'm happy to do that, but Scal's pick change can stand. |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 9:59:53 GMT
Where is the rule that states that we can change pick? Don't you know? It's been under your nose all this time... but you were too afraid to see it. /sarcasm I could definitely find instances of when it happened in past D5 rookie drafts but that would take some time. It's not a written rule. If you want a written rule we can add one, I'm happy to do that, but Scal's pick change can stand. Believe it or not. It never happened for a pick that was made by the GM of that team. I will stand to be corrected and will not post in D5 for a year if there is even a single instance in the entire history of D5 that a GM who made choice for a pick of his team, was allowed to change his pick and a change in pick was registered. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 7, 2023 10:15:59 GMT
Accidentally just deleted my reply but the following rule was posted on every Draft thread in D5 history up until last year: You may change the player that was picked for you at a later time in the draft, but only if the player you'd rather pick has not been taken by other teams. edit: ignore this, I read it wrong |
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Jul 7, 2023 12:10:05 GMT
I don't have a dog in this fight & I do think GMs are ganging up on Hana who is doing absolutely nothing wrong...
But the rule does say "picked for you" implying that you did not make the selection/auto-pick
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 7, 2023 12:11:12 GMT
Ahh yeah my bad, I guess that rule only applied when somebody had their pick made for them...
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 12:15:16 GMT
The Pelicans revise the 46th pick in the 2023 D5 draft to Jalen Pickett, guard from Penn State Can we do the right thing and do not allow this then? |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 7, 2023 12:18:28 GMT
The pick stands. Stop asking. If you want a rule change let's do that in another discussion and get it done for next year's draft since this one would be over by now if you just hurried up.
Make your pick!
|
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 12:31:31 GMT
The fools are looking like fools creating their own narrative.
Show me any of my post that implies that I want to pick Pickett.
Fools.
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Jul 7, 2023 12:37:47 GMT
The pick stands. Stop asking. If you want a rule change let's do that in another discussion and get it done for next year's draft since this one would be over by now if you just hurried up. Make your pick! But it’s not actually a rule that you can change your pick right? The rule says you can change the player that was “picked for you” which implies changing an auto pick. I don’t think we’ve ever in the history of D5 allowed a GM to change a player he picked himself. Scal is saying there’s precedent to doing this, but there’s not. The pick should really be reversed and Scal should be given the original player he picked. We then need to restart the draft from Hana’s pick IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Jul 7, 2023 12:38:12 GMT
The fools are looking like fools creating their own narrative. Show me any of my post that implies that I want to pick Pickett. Fools. How about, instead of just stalking the conversation like a trench coat goober with thick lens glasses, you actively engage in it and express why the change to Pickett was an issue? You’re not gonna fool folks into thinking this is some kind of principled stand — you waited cause you wanted to see some games, Pickett was the highest drafted player left and if you truly wanted him, you shouldn’t have dicked around while on the clock. |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 12:41:43 GMT
The fools are looking like fools creating their own narrative. Show me any of my post that implies that I want to pick Pickett. Fools. How about, instead of just stalking the conversation like a trench coat goober with thick lens glasses, you actively engage in it and express why the change to Pickett was an issue? You’re not gonna fool folks into thinking this is some kind of principled stand — you waited cause you wanted to see some games, Pickett was the highest drafted player left and if you truly wanted him, you shouldn’t have dicked around while on the clock. Dicked around? Fool. If maximizing a rule that everyone of you hated from the get go is DICKED. What will you described you and your fellow fools who are busy acting like Intelligent people but actually FOOLS for not suggesting for it to be changed? DICK SUCKERS? Tsk. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian Noble on Jul 7, 2023 12:46:13 GMT
I haven't seen the word "fool" used this much since I last saw an episode of Downton Abbey.  |
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Jul 7, 2023 12:49:42 GMT
How about, instead of just stalking the conversation like a trench coat goober with thick lens glasses, you actively engage in it and express why the change to Pickett was an issue? You’re not gonna fool folks into thinking this is some kind of principled stand — you waited cause you wanted to see some games, Pickett was the highest drafted player left and if you truly wanted him, you shouldn’t have dicked around while on the clock. Dicked around? Fool. If maximizing a rule that everyone of you hated from the get go is DICKED. What will you described you and your fellow fools who are busy acting like Intelligent people but actually FOOLS for not suggesting for it to be changed? DICK SUCKERS? Tsk. Figured you would go for as many phallic references as possible after your balls rant in your team thread — how predictable |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 12:52:38 GMT
Dicked around? Fool. If maximizing a rule that everyone of you hated from the get go is DICKED. What will you described you and your fellow fools who are busy acting like Intelligent people but actually FOOLS for not suggesting for it to be changed? DICK SUCKERS? Tsk. Figured you would go for as many phallic references as possible after your balls rant in your team thread — how predictable Oh. You started it. Cannot back it up now? Why? You are slapped by your own "DICKED" thing? |
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Jul 7, 2023 12:58:40 GMT
Figured you would go for as many phallic references as possible after your balls rant in your team thread — how predictable Oh. You started it. Cannot back it up now? Why? You are slapped by your own "DICKED" thing?  Go on -- keep going, it's been a while since we've had a ProBoards rant lol |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 13:00:39 GMT
Oh. You started it. Cannot back it up now? Why? You are slapped by your own "DICKED" thing? Go on -- keep going, it's been a while since we've had a ProBoards rant lol I will stop now, certified Dick Sucker. Enjoy  |
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Jul 7, 2023 13:09:31 GMT
Go on -- keep going, it's been a while since we've had a ProBoards rant lol I will stop now, certified Dick Sucker. Enjoy A real honor coming from a Balls in Your Mouth enthusiast such as yourself lol  |
|
|
|
Post by Hanamichi Sakuragi on Jul 7, 2023 13:10:30 GMT
I will stop now, certified Dick Sucker. Enjoy A real honor coming from a Balls in Your Mouth enthusiast such as yourself lol As expected from a CDS. You love playing those balls. |
|
Cleveland Cavaliers
Boston Celtics
Charlotte Hornets
Utah Jazz
Chicago Bulls
Houston Rockets
Brooklyn Nets
San Antonio Spurs
