Magic Johnson
Former Lakers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 458
Feb 27, 2024 20:39:01 GMT
|
Post by Magic Johnson on Dec 1, 2012 16:06:14 GMT
Current Rating: 69 SUGGESTED RATING: 97 JK Suggested Rating: 75 espn.go.com/nba/player/stats/_/id/4264/patrick-pattersonPPG: 14.2 RPG: 5.2 FG: .514 FT: .750 PER: 16.67 USAGE: 18.4 I'll list a few players that have similar or identical stats to Patterson and their ratings and some of the stats they have. I'll post PPG, RPG, FG, PER, and USAGE (Blocks I would lose out on as he doesn't get a lot of blocks AND PROBABLY REBOUNDS as well). 79 Glen Davis (14.1, 8.1, .422, 15.0, 23.5) 79 Luis Scola (12.7, 6.7, .465, 17.11, 21.1) 89 Pau Gasol (12.7, 8.9, .423, 15.27, 18.3) 85 Carlos Boozer (13.8, 9.6, .461, 16.09, 22.7) 78 Brandon Bass (9.9, 5.3, .448, 12.52, 15.9) 78 Taj Gibson (6.7, 4.7, .422, 13.28, 16.0) 77 Markief Morris (9.2, 4.6, .425, 15.05, 19.6) 84 Paul Millsap (14.1, 8.2, .458, 18.39, 21.4)
|
|
Magic Johnson
Former Lakers GM
Sophomore
Posts: 458
Feb 27, 2024 20:39:01 GMT
|
Post by Magic Johnson on Dec 2, 2012 2:53:00 GMT
HELLO ANYONE.
|
|
|
Post by Rubén Magnano on Dec 2, 2012 3:01:40 GMT
hello
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Dec 2, 2012 4:42:49 GMT
I'm ok with around a 75, personally. He really hasn't done this for that long, but I think he has shown he can do what he's doing, consistently. He may or may not have a ton of project-ability left (I'd say, not a ton left), but he has probably warranted something around a 75.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Dec 2, 2012 4:59:39 GMT
75 sounds great.
|
|
|
Post by Dominique Wilkins on Dec 2, 2012 17:49:49 GMT
Fine w a 75
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Mar 29, 2024 6:00:55 GMT
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 9, 2012 7:10:39 GMT
73
|
|
Glenn Robinson
Milwaukee Bucks
Starter
Posts: 1,226
Mar 2, 2024 5:20:47 GMT
|
Post by Glenn Robinson on Mar 15, 2013 16:22:18 GMT
Bump. 75
|
|
Glenn Robinson
Milwaukee Bucks
Starter
Posts: 1,226
Mar 2, 2024 5:20:47 GMT
|
Post by Glenn Robinson on Mar 19, 2013 21:47:02 GMT
Can we all agree that while Patterson isn't an impact guy, he definitely deserves to be higher than a 69?
|
|
|
Post by Blake Bowman on Mar 19, 2013 22:47:51 GMT
Recently he's gone down a bit from the numbers from the earlier post, at least as far as I remember. But I agree, he should be higher, like a 73 is good IMO.
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Mar 19, 2013 22:48:05 GMT
Dude, he's already in the pending increases
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jun 18, 2013 17:21:31 GMT
I actually don't see him in the main thread for pending increase, and he's still at 69 on the rating page.
Let's get him up to about a 75.
|
|