Amare Stoudemire
 Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416 
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Feb 28, 2020 1:04:43 GMT
Current 77
Proposed 79-80
*18-19 season*
18.9 minutes
45.6% fg
45.0% 3pfg
.577 efg
84.6% ft
1.6 rebounds
0.9 assists
0.5 steals
0.2 blocks
7.9 points
*Per 36*
3.1 rebounds
1.7 assists
0.9 steals
0.3 blocks
15.0 points
11.4 per
.595 true
16.6 usg
2.4 w.s.
0.3 vorp
*Now 19-20 season*
24.2 minutes
47.6% fg
43.4% 3pfg
.599 efg
87.2% ft
2.4 rebounds
2.0 assists
0.6 steals
0.1 blocks
11.7 points
*Per 36*
3.6 rebounds
3.0 assists
0.9 steals
0.2 blocks
17.4 points
15.1 per
.625 true
18.2 usg
3.6 w.s.
0.9 vorp
You can obviously see by the increases that Seth has definitely earned a ratings increase after these last 2 years
He's played great for the irl Mavs this year
|
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Feb 28, 2020 1:06:49 GMT
11.7 ppg and nothing else really isn't anywhere close to an 80 IMO. You better be careful you don't catch a decrease from this thread lol
78
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Feb 28, 2020 1:11:51 GMT
11.7 ppg and nothing else really isn't anywhere close to an 80 IMO. You better be careful you don't catch a decrease from this thread lol I'll vote no change, 77 That's in 24.7 mpg, if you can't see the obvious production he's been putting in this year I think your blind |
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Feb 28, 2020 1:14:54 GMT
He's close or the same as jj Reddick but 3 years younger
|
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Feb 28, 2020 1:16:28 GMT
He's close or the same as jj Reddick but 3 years younger age doesn’t matter! 77.15 |
|
Tim Duncan
Former Jazz GM
Sophomore
Posts: 482
Mar 9, 2022 22:04:51 GMT
|
Post by Tim Duncan on Feb 28, 2020 1:17:00 GMT
He's close or the same as jj Reddick but 3 years younger Doesnt matter if he is 3 years younger or 10 years older.All ratings are based on production and not potential |
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Feb 28, 2020 1:18:25 GMT
He's close or the same as jj Reddick but 3 years younger Doesnt matter if he is 3 years younger or 10 years older.All ratings are based on production and not potential I agree with age, but Seth has definitely proven himself this year imo |
|
|
|
Post by Andrei Kirilenko on Feb 28, 2020 1:18:33 GMT
He's close or the same as jj Reddick but 3 years younger That's highest percentage volume 3-point shooter in the league JJ Redick to you, sir  But you are right, perhaps Seth deserves some recognition for his efficiency if nothing else. I'll update my vote to a 78 |
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Feb 28, 2020 1:20:51 GMT
He's close or the same as jj Reddick but 3 years younger That's highest percentage volume 3-point shooter in the league JJ Redick to you, sir But you are right, perhaps Seth deserves some recognition for his efficiency if nothing else. I'll update my vote to a 78 I'm not saying he's quite Reddick status, but he's definitely showing his worth is all I'm saying |
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Feb 28, 2020 2:01:43 GMT
Just a general PSA: A player's improvement or decline from one year to the next is not necessarily enough to warrant an increase or decrease.
- It's possible he was over-rated or under-rated the year before.
- It's possible it's been a long time since he last had a stock watch.
I'd like for everyone to just see current stats (POSSIBLY show the difference between how they were producing around their last stockwatch vs. now - IF we're talking about a 2nd in-season stock watch) and have an idea about what those stats mean to them, in rating form.
So, Seth Curry:
11.7p | 2.4r | 2.0a | 0.6s | 0.1b on 47.6/43.4/87.2 shooting.
The fact he plays 24mpg is more important to me than his Per/36 rates. What's his actual impact on the game? There's a reason he plays 24 mpg. Doesn't mean he can't handle more, but I think that 24 mpg and whatever it means to that particular player is much more important and worth thinking about, digesting, etc, than his Per/36.
Anyway, we've got an awesome-shooting SG who can pass just a little bit. He plays enough minutes to fall into a couple rebounds a game and he gets in the way of the ball once every other game.
77 honestly seems fine to me. I'm fine going in and making sure he's built correctly (what we'd call a REWORK) but I don't see reason to take him over a 77, especially as he's not some physical freak, either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Feb 28, 2020 3:59:47 GMT
77
Edit: 78 after his big game
|
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Feb 28, 2020 15:49:29 GMT
79
Edit: changed vote from 77 to 79
|
|
|
|
Post by Tom Izzo on Feb 29, 2020 2:06:42 GMT
77
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Krzyzewski on Feb 29, 2020 12:47:38 GMT
77.5
|
|
|
|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Mar 3, 2020 15:44:47 GMT
77
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Mar 5, 2020 13:18:32 GMT
Seth curry last 11 games
31.6 mpg
19.8 ppg
3.5 rpg
3.1 apg
1.0 spg
56.8 fg%
56.2 3pfg%
Pretty solid numbers
|
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Mar 17, 2020 2:58:00 GMT
THREAD CLOSED
New Rating: 78
|
|
Brooklyn Nets
Utah Jazz
Minnesota Timberwolves
Portland Trailblazers
New Orleans Pelicans
Houston Rockets
LA Clippers
Detroit Pistons
