Dewayne Dedmon

[Jerry West]

2 season wonder with the horrible Hawks.

Current: 77
Proposed: 73

Doesn't play anymore despite being a starter at the start of the season:

4.8 - 3.8 - 0.3 (1.4 TO, horrible A/TO) - 0.4 - 0.5

[George Gervin]

73

[Brian Scalabrine]

Too early. This guy was really good the last 2 years. Kings just aren't using him

[Walt Frazier]

I'd maybe vote 76 for now to adjust him... But it's a little early for a big change and he's not rated quite highly enough to make a huge impact rn

[Kevin Hollis]

74

[Hanamichi Sakuragi]

77

[Tim Duncan]

76

[Hanamichi Sakuragi]

Jan 3, 2020 13:43:53 GMT Walt Frazier said:

I'd maybe vote 76 for now to adjust him... But it's a little early for a big change and he's not rated quite highly enough to make a huge impact rn

Here is another example Walt in using the popular thought process as we see several fellows already pushing for Dedmon to have a decrease of 2-4 points. Even though, it is not really realistic that his skill level will decrease by that much at this point of his career.

What you did here is what I am trying to push that some of our fellow GMs should also consider. 

[Tom Izzo]

If he gets traded and starts producing again we will be right back here. I say no change and practice patience. By the All Star break if he is still trash I'd support a decrease

[Tom Izzo]

Can I get my flair changed plzzzz 😊

[Walt Frazier]

Jan 4, 2020 6:35:43 GMT Hanamichi Sakuragi said:

Jan 3, 2020 13:43:53 GMT Walt Frazier said:

I'd maybe vote 76 for now to adjust him... But it's a little early for a big change and he's not rated quite highly enough to make a huge impact rn

Here is another example Walt in using the popular thought process as we see several fellows already pushing for Dedmon to have a decrease of 2-4 points. Even though, it is not really realistic that his skill level will decrease by that much at this point of his career.

What you did here is what I am trying to push that some of our fellow GMs should also consider. 

If you read my full statement from the other thread (granted, it's a bit of a "through-line on my thoughts, and not written especially well), I do say there are exceptions and other things to consider. Also, I said here, he's not rated so high that he's really impacting the game that much anyway so we can afford to wait.

[Hanamichi Sakuragi]

Jan 5, 2020 1:08:59 GMT Walt Frazier said:

Jan 4, 2020 6:35:43 GMT Hanamichi Sakuragi said:

Here is another example Walt in using the popular thought process as we see several fellows already pushing for Dedmon to have a decrease of 2-4 points. Even though, it is not really realistic that his skill level will decrease by that much at this point of his career.

What you did here is what I am trying to push that some of our fellow GMs should also consider. 

If you read my full statement from the other thread (granted, it's a bit of a "through-line on my thoughts, and not written especially well), I do say there are exceptions and other things to consider. Also, I said here, he's not rated so high that he's really impacting the game that much anyway so we can afford to wait.

Yup. And to simplify my point, those type of contextual reasons should be magnified in the reasoning of the other GMs in the stockwatch. 

[Walt Frazier]

Will be lowered to a 76.

THREAD CLOSED - Ian Noble