|
Post by Chauncey Billups on Jul 2, 2019 13:16:47 GMT
Current: 69
Proposed: 73
Averaged: 9.3 pts / 3.2 AST / 2.3 reb in 21.8 minutes. Solid shooting percentages. Started 38 games.
I know you all don't like PER 36 averages, but I'm gonna list them anyways.
PER 36: 15.3 pts / 5.2 AST / 3.8 reb
I think an increase is warranted here
|
|
|
Post by Brian Scalabrine on Jul 2, 2019 14:09:18 GMT
Solid player 73
|
|
|
Post by Jerry West on Jul 2, 2019 14:15:45 GMT
I'll go 73 as well
|
|
Amare Stoudemire
Sacramento Kings
Starter
Posts: 2,416
Apr 14, 2024 11:04:23 GMT
|
Post by Amare Stoudemire on Jul 2, 2019 16:03:47 GMT
72
|
|
|
Post by Alex English on Jul 2, 2019 17:19:47 GMT
74
|
|
|
Post by George Gervin on Jul 2, 2019 21:27:46 GMT
73
|
|
|
Post by Jared Montini on Jul 3, 2019 1:07:39 GMT
72
|
|
|
Post by Walt Frazier on Jul 3, 2019 2:55:24 GMT
Current: 69 Proposed: 73 Averaged: 9.3 pts / 3.2 AST / 2.3 reb in 21.8 minutes. Solid shooting percentages. Started 38 games. I know you all don't like PER 36 averages, but I'm gonna list them anyways. PER 36: 15.3 pts / 5.2 AST / 3.8 reb I think an increase is warranted here I don't think there's any huge aversion to PER 36. It's when someone takes a player averaging 8 mpg and just assumes they can quadruple all of their stats and say that's "how good they are", more or less. PER 36 is a useful tool, but again when it's the only justification used on a player who isn't playing much, most people just want more evidence. Brunson is decent - 72
|
|